Trump v GOP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abynissa
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure, if you want to call Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore and St. Louis great achievements of Democrats, go right ahead.

Also, as Catholics, we are to be pro-life, The Democratic party supports abortion that sees black children killed at a rate of 3 times, maybe even 5 times of white children.

So, if one wants to make the case that blacks are being served by the Democratic Party, go ahead.
As Catholics were also suppose to help those in need, the poor, the sick. Overall the democrat those that. Republican helps the rich and filters from there. Aren’t we to help first the one who needs help? Not the one whose stuffed in cash?
 
As Catholics were also suppose to help those in need, the poor, the sick. Overall the democrat those that. Republican helps the rich and filters from there. Aren’t we to help first the one who needs help? Not the one whose stuffed in cash?
Pardon?:confused::eek:

There is a pro-life party and a pro-abortion party. Simple as that. I don’t care how good the social programs are*, you can’t take advantage of them if you are dead.

*I do not, BTW, accept that they are all good, by any means
 
So, I just read 40 people killed in Chicago in February, so since that city is run by Democrats and for a long time, it sounds like the logic here says Democrats are responsible.
 
As Catholics were also suppose to help those in need, the poor, the sick. Overall the democrat those that. Republican helps the rich and filters from there. Aren’t we to help first the one who needs help? Not the one whose stuffed in cash?
The case can be made the Democrats are the rich party, the Clintons, George Soros, big money there.

The above quote seems to rely on a stereotype.
 
Ugh. I’m starting to long for a return to a discussion of Trump here… Scary.
 
84, 88, 96, 2000-2012 Georgia voted republican presidential election.
So?

They did not control the State Legislatures. According to the above logic, that means Florida is a Democratic State because the last 2 elections, they voted for Obama. Yet, all of their major office holders clearly are Republicans.
 
As Catholics were also suppose to help those in need, the poor, the sick. Overall the democrat those that. Republican helps the rich and filters from there. Aren’t we to help first the one who needs help? Not the one whose stuffed in cash?
Show where this says this in Church teaching that the Government is suppose to do this?

At the same time, Catholics are forbidden per aiding the abortion industry in one single way.

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19741118_declaration-abortion_en.html

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a5.htm

That is Catholic teaching. If one helps the abortion agenda, one helps the murderous consequences on souls in this world.

What above is quoted are just loose teachings of Jesus, that we as Catholics do but the Government does not have to do that.
 
You tell me. Your the one saying that all democrats did in the south was hang blacks. Why then are blacks predominantly voting democrat nationwide?
JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama.

Oh, and Richard Nixon’s “Southern strategy” used not only by him but also Ronald Reagan and the Bush Brothers.
 
The case can be made the Democrats are the rich party, the Clintons, George Soros, big money there.

The above quote seems to rely on a stereotype.
Stereotypes and Democrat talking points. Just as an aside, most of the top ten richest people in Congress, nine I think, are Democrats. No Republican I know does not want to help the poor, but in helping them we should also help them be able to help themselves.
 
Ah, but you made it sound like those democrats. These were republicans stopping a republican to bring down the confederate flag.

Let me ask you, blacks are rich, poor, middle class, their also educated and others not so much. Yet most of the time, in recent history (some 30 years) they have sided with democrats. Why?
Why? Because Democrats tell them how much they have done for them and they believe it.
 
White genocide could mean whites are being persecuted.

If Bin Laden could talk now, it would depend on what he says. If what he says is insightful, Trump could very well retweet it.
I thought white genocide was a CALL for whites to be exterminated… :confused:
 
Pardon?:confused::eek:

There is a pro-life party and a pro-abortion party. Simple as that. I don’t care how good the social programs are*, you can’t take advantage of them if you are dead.

*I do not, BTW, accept that they are all good, by any means
So you don’t care that the rich get richer, while the poor get their luck handed everyday?
 
Sure, if you want to call Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore and St. Louis great achievements of Democrats, go right ahead.

Also, as Catholics, we are to be pro-life, The Democratic party supports abortion that sees black children killed at a rate of 3 times, maybe even 5 times of white children.

So, if one wants to make the case that blacks are being served by the Democratic Party, go ahead.
This site shows that the states with the highest crime rate are republican.
editions.lib.umn.edu/smartpolitics/2009/09/16/red-states-have-higher-crime-r/

Look both parties are no angel. Both parties have blood on their hands. No one can say, but the democrats or those damn republicans.

No both parties have blood on their hands. Both parties have made their bank accounts grow substantially.
 
This site shows that the states with the highest crime rate are republican.
editions.lib.umn.edu/smartpolitics/2009/09/16/red-states-have-higher-crime-r/

Look both parties are no angel. Both parties have blood on their hands. No one can say, but the democrats or those damn republicans.

No both parties have blood on their hands. Both parties have made their bank accounts grow substantially.
And which states are poorer? Oh, there goes that argument that the Republicans are richer which is just class warfare.

Anyway, my Catholic faith clearly defines we are to be against abortion, period.

No Catholic teaching dwells on the government taking care of everyone.
 
And which states are poorer? Oh, there goes that argument that the Republicans are richer which is just class warfare.

Anyway, my Catholic faith clearly defines we are to be against abortion, period.

No Catholic teaching dwells on the government taking care of everyone.
The church is also against the death penalty. The Republican Party is for the death penalty.

Wait, your going to say it’s not an official teaching?
 
You tell me. Your the one saying that all democrats did in the south was hang blacks. Why then are blacks predominantly voting democrat nationwide?
I never said anything of the sort, please cite your evidence that I did such.
The church is also against the death penalty. The Republican Party is for the death penalty.

Wait, your going to say it’s not an official teaching?
I don’t support the death penalty but this is what the Church says

From the CCC

Capital Punishment

2267 The traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude, presupposing full ascertainment of the identity and responsibility of the offender, recourse to the death penalty, when this is the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor.

"If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.
"Today, in fact, given the means at the State’s disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender ‘today … are very rare, if not practically non-existent.’[John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.]
 
I don’t support the death penalty but this is what the Church says

From the CCC

Capital Punishment

2267 The traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude, presupposing full ascertainment of the identity and responsibility of the offender, recourse to the death penalty, when this is the only practicable way to defend the lives of human beings effectively against the aggressor.

"If, instead, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, public authority should limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.
"Today, in fact, given the means at the State’s disposal to effectively repress crime by rendering inoffensive the one who has committed it, without depriving him definitively of the possibility of redeeming himself, cases of absolute necessity for suppression of the offender ‘today … are very rare, if not practically non-existent.’[John Paul II, Evangelium vitae 56.]
Didn’t pope Francis just state that the death penalty is wrong. Are you going to say, he wasn’t speaking ex cathedra?

To me that’s just finding loops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top