Trump understands loyalty as commoners do. If someone has treated me kindly, I don’t bite them. That’s his foreign policy as well: be good to those who help you, and be tough with those who are not good to you. Very simple!Trump understands loyalty? Maybe he does. But be careful about what and who people are loyal too and for.
Do you really believe Trump supported Romney, or any other politician for that matter, out of the kindness of his heart?
Romney is desperately trying to elbow his way in to the nomination. He couldn’t win against Obama, but now he thinks he can beat Hillary. He is aiming to stop Trump and create a deadlock with a brokered convention that will end up choosing him for the Republican nomination. He says that Trump is bad because he throws mud, but in his speech, Romney throws a lot of mud against Trump. If Trump is so bad, why did Romney want his endorsement before?
Trump helped Romney, no matter how you cut it. He didn’t ask for a job. He wanted the republicans to win. For Romney to attack Trump is disgraceful. What he said was disgraceful.
Trump has donated to a bunch of Democrats too; how about that loyalty?
Here I am butting in again from the other side of the world.
They do make that claim. What they don’t mention is that the reductions in funding for the military result from sequestration, which itself resulted from the failure of the House of Representatives to pass a budget that both the GOP and Democrats could agree to. Later, the House GOP wanted to raise military spending without raising spending on other domestic issues, which the Democrats rejected. In the end, reduced military spending resulted from a complete inability of the GOP-controlled Congress to pass a budget.
Romney is trashing Trump in an effort to create a brokered convention where he can be the nominee. Romney knew he couldn’t win the primaries, so a brokered convention is his only chance.
This is only the beginning. Wait until the Democrats begin campaigning in earnest against Trump. He offers a very big target for negative campaigning – even without all of the attacks from within the GOP.
He ran twice and lost twice. America has listened and said no to Romney.
I think so also and its why I believe his conversation went as it did about Ohio and Fla, which would continue to ensure a brokered convention. Aside from this we would all have to be deaf dumb and blind to believe ALL are flying sola in this obvious conspiracy. Be that as it may be many insist they will not vote for Trump regardless which must happen or the loss is automatic. I find that to be traitorous to the common good and frankly unacceptable. Further Mitt should have had the heart to talk about the Democrat comp as he has Trump. Its quite a dog and pony show imho.
I don’t believe that. He’s a complete failure as a candidate as the last two election cycles prove. There is zero reason to think the GOP would put in a two time loser.
No I don’t believe that is remotely true. Nobody wants Clinton.
LOL with 60-70% of Republicans not supporting Trump, attacks against him are in no way usurping the will of the people. Because people who support other candidates are part of the people too.
She’s popular with Democrats, including those who support Sanders. I know that she’s hated among the GOP, but she’s going to do very well with blacks and Hispanics, with women, and a bunch of other groups that tend to vote for Democrats. She leads Trump in the national polls (which really don’t matter that much, since it’s the electoral college that elects a President, and the Democrats have a built-in advantage there), and I think the gap will widen after what is likely to be a campaign full of negative campaigning. It’s hard to focus the attack his policies, since no one knows what those are, really.
More than likely, someone has offered him the coveted Ambassador to France Job.