L
limerick
Guest
Yes, yes, and I’ve done all the research I want to do on NFP. I am not speaking about conception here; my focus is on what NFP will not do, such as diagnose cancer or PCOS, for instance. On their website, Brigham and Women’s Hospital lists ten different diagnostic tests to determine the nature of reproductive problems: they do not list NFP as one of them. Please list illnesses or diseases that are known to have been diagnosed through charting.There’s more to it than cervical mucous. In fact many illness are diagnosed with the help of the charting. You should probably do more research. NFP also is used with success to conceive because all those indicators are useful in diagnosis because they show the whole picture of what is going on with the woman at any given time in the cycle. The pill is a one size fits all treatment to a very specific problem. More indepth studies are needed to look at each specific hormonal deficiency. Why do think a woman could be treated with pill after pill and not find the solution?
None of which changes the fact that the marital relationship is damaged by direct willfull sterilization. It can never return to the full meaning of communion that it was before the procedure. Its not the right option for catholics who respect the sacramental meaning of their lives and their bodies.
You say the pill is “a one size fits all treatment to a very specific problem.” If the pill is a one trick pony, which trick does it uniquely address: altering fertility or diagnosing fertility problems?
Some marital relationships may be damaged by sterilization. On the other hand, some marriages thrive. It is not the right choice for Catholics as you describe them here; but not all Catholics live as you describe them here, and not all couples are Catholics.
Limerick