Tucker: The left doesn't want Joe Biden to debate President Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
facts are pesky things that trump can only be bothered with
Please give an example.

As it turns out, President Trump has proven to be one of the most politically ethical Presidents we’ve had. Even 12 Hillary-supporting lawyers with access to all of Trump’s records could not find anything on President Trump in the Mueller (well, actually Weissman) probe.
 

Joe Biden was so proud of his role in the prosecutor’s removal from investigating the company paying his son $50,000 per month merely to serve on its board that he actually bragged about it in a 2018 speech at an event for the publication Foreign Affairs. In this speech, Biden boasts his threat to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loans from Ukraine if they did not agree to fire the prosecutor who happened to be investigating the company giving his son a cushy sinecure.
The prosecutor was fired, and the investigation was dropped six months later.


The “quid pro quo” question remains unanswered: U.S. special envoy Kurt Volker’s recent testimony indicates the exact opposite.

But, even if true, was Trump wrong to pursue a serious charge of quid pro quo — against “Quid Pro Joe”? Absolutely not. Trump did exactly what he should do, if he actually did it. On legal and constitutional grounds, he has every right to condition or withhold aid — military or otherwise — to a foreign nation in order to force that nation’s assistance in a serious investigation of high-level political corruption or any number of other policy goals.
 
Last edited:
Don’t you all think that if a third party produced a reasonable, intelligent, middle aged (vs elderly) politically middle of the road candidate who could form complete sentences and follow a logical train of thought at this time, that he’d stand a good chance?
Why do we have to be stuck with these candidates?
 
Who’s Weissman?
Because Mueller appeared to not even know what was in the “Mueller Report”, huge speculation is that the next man in charge, Andrew Weissman, was actually in charge of the whole thing.



 
Of course you do 🤔 … what Biden said was very clear and there is no need to discuss what he really meant …

I bet you don’t consider the dramatized fictional reading of what President Trump [did not] say on the Ukraine call that was read into the Congressional Record by Adam Schiff bunk … that is is probably the absolute opposite of “bunk” it has to be exactly what Trump meant to say rather that what he actually did say 🤣 🤣
 
dramatized fictional reading of what President Trump [did not] say on the Ukraine call that was read into the Congressional Record by Adam Schiff
Further proof that they couldn’t find anything corrupt on Trump, even with 12 enthusiastic Democrat supporting lawyers having access to all of Trump’s records. If they had found anything, Schiff wouldn’t have had to make up an admitted fictional story.

Notice that the leftists media did not attack Schiff for his nonsense. The same old TDS. What would otherwise be considered highly offensive is just fine if it attacks Trump.
 
Last edited:
Notice that the leftists media did not attack Schiff for his nonsense.
He was attacked for not calling Bolton and Trump to testify. A majority of Americans wanted Trump removed immediately.
 
Last edited:
Bingo. The leftist media didn’t give Schiff due criticism or demand that Schiff resign for this:


The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., made up his own version of a transcript between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart to fit the false narrative being peddled by Democrats and many in the media to frame the president for a crime that never happened.
 
And this was done because they had nothing of any substance - thus the need to tell a lie and sell that lie to the American public …

Much like we kept hearing how treasonous foreign interference in an election was … and how Trump and his minions should be punished … WHILE all the time it was know that Christopher Steele [a foreign national] peddled a dossier filled with Russian [a foreign country] information that was bought and paid for by not Trump] but the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton through a legal firm and also partly funded with US Tax payer funds by our own FBI/CIA alphabet soup organizations … 😳 🤬

And everyone who was sold bad foreigners / bad Trump should be calling for the TRULY bad actors who actually did the deed of foreign interference in our election - the DNC, Hillary, Steele and the Russians - who are actually laughing at the 4 plus years of chaos they received delivered by the Democrats in Congress - Schiff, Pelosi and Nadler and the traitorous Law Enforcement represented by Page Strok, Comey, Mueller et al
 
There are many Democrats that want to see a debate. Hi~

At least it will be on issues that people truly are concerned about, knowledge on these topics with remedy and plans need to be heard, all else is sputter…All pundit news media outlets will take a back seat when it’s one on one.

Let them each speak to health care, the pandemic, jobs, unions, and a guided plan for recovery in a way that will not overwhelm the health care system again.

That’s not alot to ask, or is it?
 
That’s not alot to ask, or is it?
It would be nice, if there would be an immediate fact-check so that the liar’s nose would be rubbed into their excrement. Otherwise it would just another platform to spread the lies and misinformation - which is Trump’s method of “debating”.
 
the traitorous Law Enforcement represented by Page Strok, Comey, Mueller et al
Well, at least they all testified under oath. How did Trump do under oath?
 
Last edited:
Nope - not the Free Beacon … Bought and paid for by the DNC, Hillary Clinton and the FBI …

 
It would be nice, if there would be an immediate fact-check so that the liar’s nose would be rubbed into their excrement. Otherwise it would just another platform to spread the lies and misinformation - which is Trump’s method of “debating”.
Absolutely true…Be that as it may, it is and will be up to the American voters to “fact-check” for themselves. Believing everything at face value is poor business/conduct…we know many of our friends/family led astray, but accountability ultimately falls on the voter themselves…Accountability shouldn’t be a thing of the past but fact checking from our favorite media pundits should be.

Edited for: Highly favor a debate!!!

Are they seriously trying to use cognitive measure against Biden, is that what was thrown on the wall and stuck??? well, nuke me a hurricane…I believe that to be a mistake, lol.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely true…Be that as it may, it is and will be up to the American voters to “fact-check” for themselves.
That is an excellent attitude, but it forgets one thing. The attention span of an average person is about a few minutes, and their comprehension skill is even lower.

Just consider, that the commercials are highly successful in bamboozling too many of the buyers, even though there is ample information all over the place… for example in Consumer Reports.

It sounds rather “uppity” but it is very easy to mislead people. And the only weapon is to expose the lies of the politicians, left and right - by presenting the FACTS. All the time!
 
Are they seriously trying to use cognitive measure against Biden
One reason Joe Biden’s handlers would not want him to participate in a one-on-one debate against Trump is that they fear Biden might make another revealing statement about his true beliefs:

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top