Tucker: Trump gets US out of bad deal and left melts down

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cathoholic

Guest
Great job by Tucker exposing the stupidity of the Paris Climate Accord.
 
Great job by Tucker exposing the stupidity of the Paris Climate Accord.
Of course. Let’s ignore the Vatican and our bishops and listen to Tucker Carlson. 👍

Even tillerson thought we should stay.
 
Of course. Let’s ignore the Vatican and our bishops and listen to Tucker Carlson. 👍

Even tillerson thought we should stay.
Are statements on political agendas made by the Vatican and bishops de fide, and binding on all Roman Catholics?
 
Sophie Lawrence:
Of course. Let’s ignore the Vatican and our bishops and listen to Tucker Carlson.
Sophie Lawrence. Did you watch Tucker?

He did not push or pull back from the Paris Accords. He specifically called himself “agnotic” concerning the Paris Accords.

All Tucker did was ask HOW America sending money off to foreign entities will help with global warming.

And he never got an answer.

So I suppose it would be reasonable to ask you the same thing.

HOW does America sending hard earned US taxpayer money off to foreign entities help with global warming?

I’ll wait for your answer and proceed as indicated.

God bless.

Cathoholic

PS Would you also explain the caveats Pope Francis has warned about too, in the context of environmental stewardship please (because Pope Francis DID give us several WARNINGS and I want you to lay out what those warnings were for the readers of this thread so we can get a COMPLETE, not just a partial, Vatican take on the issue).

I’ll wait for that as well.
 
Great job by Tucker exposing the stupidity of the Paris Climate Accord.
Actually he spend almost all of his time asserting the stupidity of people who he thinks are ignorant; he spent very little time talking about the Paris agreement.

But he did give a number $3b/yr the the US pledged to mobilize to support renewable energy and carbon-footprint mitgation in developing countries. I take it then, that posts about $200b from US to China, and such, are wrong.
 
Did you watch Tucker?

He did not push or pull back from the Paris Accords. He specifically called himself “agnotic” concerning the Paris Accords.

All Tucker did was ask HOW America sending money off to foreign entities will help with global warming.

And he never got an answer.

So I suppose it would be reasonable to ask you the same thing.

HOW does America sending hard earned US taxpayer money off to foreign entities help with global warming?
What do you think is the reason?
 
Of course. Let’s ignore the Vatican and our bishops and listen to Tucker Carlson. 👍

Even tillerson thought we should stay.
Maybe you should read what the Accord actually says…

Basically it states that we the US will lower our emissions (which we are and can continue to do) but we also promise to pay poor countries who are polluters while they continue to pollute and that includes China and India which are not reducing greenhouse gases and have no obligation to do so …and the Accord is non binding …so if you meet zero of the things you said (which most of the countries would not) the US gets stuck …

It is basically a re-distribution of wealth …that does little except cost jobs in the US, increase daily costs to US citizens and companies at the pump, for goods and services, and utilities and increased taxes …it also will increase that debt we are leaving our grandchildren that is already in the trillions of $$s.

How about the private jet liberal elite give up their flying around the globe, multiple homes, Mass vehicle filled garages attend the next climate summit via Skype - that would reduce greenhouse gases;)

Americans can and should (we are by the way) move to reduce waste and pollution - individually, in our businesses, local governments, schools, and federal level. We do not need a non binding agreement to do so. We can encourage and support other countries in doing the same without Killing our economy. We should leave our grandchildren the chance of economic prosperity with a cleaner healthier earth and as little debt as possible.
 
YADA:
How about the private jet liberal elite give up their flying around the globe, multiple homes, Mass vehicle filled garages attend the next climate summit via Skype - that would reduce greenhouse gases
Good suggestion YADA.

The first half of **the video segment here **illustrates just a small sample of some of this elite global warming activist hypocrisy . . .
. . . .Billionaires Richard Branson, Elon Musk and Bill Gates called Trump’s decision dangerous, yet they all own private jets.
Leonardo DiCaprio said leaving the pact “threatens the livability” of our planet, but he flew back and forth to Cannes, France, in a private jet… to accept a climate award.
Hillary Clinton called it a “historic mistake,” yet she took a private jet just 20 miles from Martha’s Vineyard to Nantucket for a fundraiser.
Meantime, former President Barack Obama has taken more than his fair of private jets and helicopters since leaving the White House, but he still criticized Trump for pulling out of the agreement. . . .
insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/02/tucker-carlson-ann-coulter-slam-hillary-obama-others-awesome-hypocrisy-climate-change
 
If I was one of them, I WOULD NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP MY JET.
 
Maybe you should read what the Accord actually says…

Basically it states that we the US will lower our emissions (which we are and can continue to do) but we also promise to pay poor countries who are polluters while they continue to pollute and that includes China and India which are not reducing greenhouse gases and have no obligation to do so …and the Accord is non binding …so if you meet zero of the things you said (which most of the countries would not) the US gets stuck …
Maybe you should convey what the Accord actually says!
 
Are statements on political agendas made by the Vatican and bishops de fide, and binding on all Roman Catholics?
Their political agendas on same sex marriage and abortion seems to be binding.

Which is my way of asking why the above is ‘faith and morals’ while environmentalism is ‘political’? I think protecting the lives of the human species is a point of morality.
 
Maybe you should read what the Accord actually says…

Basically it states that we the US will lower our emissions (which we are and can continue to do) but we also promise to pay poor countries who are polluters while they continue to pollute and that includes China and India which are not reducing greenhouse gases and have no obligation to do so …and the Accord is non binding …so if you meet zero of the things you said (which most of the countries would not) the US gets stuck …

It is basically a re-distribution of wealth …that does little except cost jobs in the US, increase daily costs to US citizens and companies at the pump, for goods and services, and utilities and increased taxes …it also will increase that debt we are leaving our grandchildren that is already in the trillions of $$s.

How about the private jet liberal elite give up their flying around the globe, multiple homes, Mass vehicle filled garages attend the next climate summit via Skype - that would reduce greenhouse gases;)

Americans can and should (we are by the way) move to reduce waste and pollution - individually, in our businesses, local governments, schools, and federal level. We do not need a non binding agreement to do so. We can encourage and support other countries in doing the same without Killing our economy. We should leave our grandchildren the chance of economic prosperity with a cleaner healthier earth and as little debt as possible.
In a nutshell.I heard that the air in India is akin to turning one’s car on inside a garage with the door down. :eek:
 
Maybe you should read what the Accord actually says…

Basically it states that we the US will lower our emissions (which we are and can continue to do) but we also promise to pay poor countries who are polluters while they continue to pollute and that includes China and India which are not reducing greenhouse gases and have no obligation to do so …and the Accord is non binding …so if you meet zero of the things you said (which most of the countries would not) the US gets stuck …

It is basically a re-distribution of wealth …that does little except cost jobs in the US, increase daily costs to US citizens and companies at the pump, for goods and services, and utilities and increased taxes …it also will increase that debt we are leaving our grandchildren that is already in the trillions of $$s.

How about the private jet liberal elite give up their flying around the globe, multiple homes, Mass vehicle filled garages attend the next climate summit via Skype - that would reduce greenhouse gases;)

Americans can and should (we are by the way) move to reduce waste and pollution - individually, in our businesses, local governments, schools, and federal level. We do not need a non binding agreement to do so. We can encourage and support other countries in doing the same without Killing our economy. We should leave our grandchildren the chance of economic prosperity with a cleaner healthier earth and as little debt as possible.
A couple things I find intriguing. First, is people aren’t angry that politicians got us into such a bad deal which costs us with an initial payout, then binds us to actions which will cost us even more.

Second, that people aren’t angry the government, which has borrowed $60,000 already on EVERY American’s account, is putting billions more on the credit card which DOESN’T force the countries we are paying the money to, to do anything.

Talking about a lose / lose. There has to be more behind the scenes we aren’t being told about.
PAX
 
A couple things I find intriguing. First, is people aren’t angry that politicians got us into such a bad deal which costs us with an initial payout, then binds us to actions which will cost us even more.

Second, that people aren’t angry the government, which has borrowed $60,000 already on EVERY American’s account, is putting billions more on the credit card which DOESN’T force the countries we are paying the money to, to do anything.

Talking about a lose / lose. There has to be more behind the scenes we aren’t being told about.
It is a global problem. We cannot fix it on our own. We need cooperation from everyone. We can and will do much on our own. But, while we need their cooperation, we cannot just that poorer countries lacking the financial wherewithal make take the same steps without help. So we, together with all of the developed countries pledged to mobilize support to the developing countries. All countries pledge to be transparent about the steps being taken.

That is a good and an historically good agreement. Nothing to get angry about.

What is your plan to get the global cooperation needed to make progress on this problem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top