Two Views Of Likely Catholic Leader

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beau_Ouiville
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Beau_Ouiville

Guest
"The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops gathers in Baltimore this week to decide who will be its next president, and if past is prologue, we know who will win: Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, Ariz. But this year, what is usually a rote decision is garnering a flurry of debate.

Kicanus is seen as an easygoing diplomat who prefers digging into policy papers over hogging the spotlight. And he’s popular."

npr.org/2010/11/12/131281147/two-views-of-likely-catholic-leader
 
"The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops gathers in Baltimore this week to decide who will be its next president, and if past is prologue, we know who will win: Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, Ariz. But this year, what is usually a rote decision is garnering a flurry of debate.

Kicanus is seen as an easygoing diplomat who prefers digging into policy papers over hogging the spotlight. And he’s popular."

npr.org/2010/11/12/131281147/two-views-of-likely-catholic-leader
I’m trying to figure this one out. All I can find online so far are a) criticism regarding sexual abuse record and b) complaints about his immigration statements.

He has addressed/defended his handling of the abuse involvement. From what I can tell, his immigration statements are equivalent to one of my favorite bishop’s - Archbishop Chaput. Are there other stances or statements or actions by Bishop Kicanus that are of concern? If not, then I don’t see what the problem is.
 
I’m trying to figure this one out. All I can find online so far are a) criticism regarding sexual abuse record and b) complaints about his immigration statements.

He has addressed/defended his handling of the abuse involvement. From what I can tell, his immigration statements are equivalent to one of my favorite bishop’s - Archbishop Chaput. Are there other stances or statements or actions by Bishop Kicanus that are of concern? If not, then I don’t see what the problem is.
I agree with you. Some people are hung up on his handling of the ordination of a man who gave indications of being homosexual, but his record overall has been good, and given the precedent of the way the President is chosen, it would seem that he personally would have to be the abuser to be denied the slot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top