Under the shtick, a quiet devotion [by Colbert]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beau_Ouiville
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Beau_Ouiville

Guest
"When Colbert finally let his well-coiffed hair down and got serious about the “really, really hard work” done by migrant farmworkers, even more people were surprised when the funnyman gave a glimpse of his private faith. “And, you know, whatsoever you do for the least of my brothers, and these seem like the least of our brothers right now,” Colbert said, quoting Jesus. “Migrant workers suffer and have no rights.”

It was a different kind of religious message than Colbert typically delivers on Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” where he often pokes fun at religion - even his own Catholic Church - in pursuit of a laugh. Yet it was the kind of serious faith that some of his fellow Catholics say makes him a serious, covert and potent evangelist for their faith.

“Anytime you talk about Jesus or Christianity respectfully the way he does, it is evangelization,” said the Rev. Jim Martin, associate editor of the Jesuit magazine America, who has appeared on Colbert’s show four times. "He is preaching the gospel, but I think he is doing it in a very postmodern way."

It’s a contrast to Glenn Beck, the kind of right-wing media icon Colbert loves to skewer. While Beck’s recent Restoring Honor rally in Washington was headed by a conservative broadcaster who embraces theological patriotism, Colbert’s March to Keep Fear Alive on Oct. 30 will be helmed by a man of more private faith who leaves his God-and-country religion on the set.

Colbert has said that he attends church, observes Lent and teaches Sunday school. “I love my church, and I’m a Catholic who was raised by intellectuals, who were very devout,” he told Time Out magazine. “I was raised to believe that you could question the church and still be a Catholic.” His on-air persona, meanwhile, is a bloviating holier-than-thou conservative whose orthodox Catholicism is part of what makes him funny. On air, Colbert has chided the pope as an “ecu-menace” for his outreach to other faiths, referred to non-Catholics as “heathens and the excommunicated” and calls those who believe in evolution “monkey men.”

washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/15/AR2010101505616.html
 
Its his humor, he wasn’t being serious. Have you ever seen his show?
 
There is no causing a “stir” in this situation. Yes its an American tv show, his humor is satire. Almost everything about his show is meant to poke fun at the ridiculousness in our society.
 
Beau, thanks for posting this. Colbert is amazing and usually spot on.

👍
 
The few times I’ve heard Colbert out of character, he sounds like a nice guy. I don’t doubt that he is sincere about this Catholic faith. That said, it concerns me when people use a line like “I was raised to believe that you could question the church and still be a Catholic.” It depends on what they mean. Typically, they use the word “question,” rather than “defy” because the former sounds softer. However, if the questioning means that they think that you can be pro-choice, be in favor of gay marriage, etc., then that is a little more than “questioning.”

When it comes to immigration, I do wish my party took a more Catholic approach, but I haven’t seen much better from the Democrats. Haven’t Democrats been bragging about how Obama has actually been stronger on enforcement than Bush was? Personally, I was/am in favor of real reform, as offered during the last administration. I am still hopeful that it may happen, but that hope is waning.

Since the Democrats didn’t seize the opportunity during the first two years of total control, I guess we can make the same argument that pro-choice, Catholic Democrats make about the Republican Party. The Democrats aren’t truly for immigration reform - just lip service. They missed their opportunity.
 
I think the point here is that Colbert is a strident criticizer of all that is pompous and stuffy in our political landscape. In addition, he skewers the conservative loudmouth “talking heads” regularly with pointed barbs.

In addition, much of his approach and outlook is based on his Catholic faith. Something to think about.
 
With the country on the verge of fiscal meltdown and on it’s way to hyper inflation. As well as the riots escalating in Europe. I am not sure how a comedian like Colbert or anyone, could be relevant to our Catholic families and children?🤷
 
With the country on the verge of fiscal meltdown and on it’s way to hyper inflation. As well as the riots escalating in Europe. I am not sure how a comedian like Colbert or anyone, could be relevant to our Catholic families and children?
Sometimes a comedian is very good at showing men’s follies.

And those of women, too.

That narrows the issues during stressful times. Cannot laughter be relevant to Catholicism? See “The Name of the Rose”. "The forbidden knowledge is at the core of the mystery in The Name of the Rose, and the forbidden knowledge is the knowledge of laughter. "

lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1690171.html
 
… it concerns me when people use a line like “I was raised to believe that you could question the church and still be a Catholic.” It depends on what they mean. Typically, they use the word “question,” rather than “defy” because the former sounds softer. However, if the questioning means that they think that you can be pro-choice, be in favor of gay marriage, etc., then that is a little more than “questioning.”
Questioning, rather than blindly accepting, is good, in my opinion.

In questioning, one finds out the REASON for a belief. Do we want to be blind sheep, or would be rather be EDUCATED? When others question us on why the Catholics believe something, wouldn’t it be better to give an educated response instead of saying, “That’s what is taught.” ?

I question the Church on things…does not mean my faith is any less! In fact, I would argue it is stronger because I question it on things. The Church on earth is made of human beings…fallible human beings, so it is NOT perfect.
 
Questioning, rather than blindly accepting, is good, in my opinion.

In questioning, one finds out the REASON for a belief. Do we want to be blind sheep, or would be rather be EDUCATED? When others question us on why the Catholics believe something, wouldn’t it be better to give an educated response instead of saying, “That’s what is taught.” ?

I question the Church on things…does not mean my faith is any less! In fact, I would argue it is stronger because I question it on things. The Church on earth is made of human beings…fallible human beings, so it is NOT perfect.
I agree. That is why I said it depends on what he means by “question.” If he means that, I agree 100%. If he means defy, then…no. If there is dogma that a Catholic disagrees with, then the correct attitude should be that the Catholic doesn’t fully understand Church teaching…not that the Church may be wrong. Of course, there are items of prudential judgement where more latitude is allowed.
 
Colbert, the youngest of 10 children was raised by intellectual and very devout Catholic parents.
I find his satirical humor hilarious.
 
Colbert, the youngest of 10 children was raised by intellectual and very devout Catholic parents.
I find his satirical humor hilarious.
Can you imagine what his family holiday parties are like. I love that guy.
It will be fun to see what he and Jon Stewart have in mind for their rally.
 
Well this is . . . fortuitous. The NY Times Magazine’s On Language column celebrates Colbert’s coinage of “truthiness”.
Around 4 p.m. on Oct. 17, 2005, Stephen Colbert was searching for a word. Not just any word, but one that would fit the blowhard persona that he was presenting that night on the premiere episode of Comedy Central’s “Colbert Report.” He once described his faux-pundit character as a “well-intentioned, poorly informed, high-status idiot,” and the word he was looking for had to be sublimely idiotic.
During the rehearsal, Colbert was stuck on what term to feature for the inaugural segment of “The Word,” a spoof of Bill O’Reilly’s “Talking Points.” Originally, he and the writers selected the word truth, as distinguished from those pesky facts. But as Colbert told me in a recent interview (refreshingly, he spoke to me as the real Colbert and not his alter ego), truth just wasn’t “dumb enough.” “I wanted a silly word that would feel wrong in your mouth,” he said.
What he was driving at wasn’t truth anyway, but a mere approximation of it — something truthish or truthy, unburdened by the factual. And so, in a flash of inspiration, truthiness was born. In that night’s broadcast, he imagined the disdain his coinage would engender among elitist dictionary types. “Now I’m sure some of the Word Police, the wordinistas over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word,’ ” he said. As I pointed out at the time on the linguistics blog Language Log, truthiness already appeared in the Oxford English Dictionary under the adjective truthy. To be sure, it was exceedingly rare before 2005, but it had been recorded as a somewhat playful variant of truthfulness since the early 19th century.
 
Colbert, the youngest of 10 children was raised by intellectual and very devout Catholic parents.
I find his satirical humor hilarious.
I think he’s pretty funny. And I do find high satire hilarious. He reminds me of some things out of “National Lampoon” in the seventies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top