Dear posters,
I hope some of you will find
this article interesting. Itās called, āSaudi Muslim Religious Council Condemns Terrorism.ā An important development in Saudia Arabia

. The most senior religious body in the kingdom has explicitly denounced terrorism.
What a blessing for us Westerners, and especially for Muslims! Some of the most common targets of extremist Muslims are fellow Muslims. The Shia/Sunni religious violence in Iraq is a clear example of this. Extremist sects of Muslims will frequently say that virtually all Muslims outside their own particular version of Islam is an apostate or a heretic, and will try to kill them. Consider the the Muslim vs. Muslim violence in Jordan, or in Egypt, Syria. This violence between Muslims, where government bodies try to put down extremist efforts, is especially obvious in āfront lineā battle areas like Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq.
If I recall my old research well enough, fellow Muslims are the primary victims of the Muslim extremist groups.
Some Muslim groups and some interpretations of Islam are grave threats to Christians, to Jews, to many Muslims, and to the Western world in general, and especially to the Middle East.
A mistake we Christians often make is that when a bomb goes off in the Middle East and Christians are killed, we think (often correctly), āthose fundamentalist Muslims have murdered Christians because of their view of Islam,ā but when a bomb goes off and Muslim civilians are killed, we donāt think as much about the fact that we are often witnessing a clear case of Muslims murdering other Muslims, a case where two different understandings of Islam are showing themselves to be clearly in conflict. We judge āIslamā for the murder of the Christians, but when the extremists kill Muslims next, we think āan atrocity is taking place,ā without taking into consideration that this too is often a clash over contradictory religious beliefs.
Religion isnāt the only issue spreading conflict among Muslims in the Middle East; there are also economic, social and political reasons for the violence. Religion is an important factor, though, and it is one where there are very real divides in Muslim thought that often are exposed by the clashes between governments and sects, or popular uprisings and Muslim military, or even street battles between different groups. There are a variety of different understandings of jihad, and there is self-defense going on, and reactionary behavior, and a lot of other factors contributing.
I guess what Iām most trying to say is we canāt stereotype or form broad generalizations from a few examples.
Another thing weād do well to remember, this while considering
famdigyās comments, is that many, many Catholics and Protestants have for centuries believed the same things and behaved in the same way. Here are three key ways in which most Catholics got out of this mindset:
- We began to discern the spiritual nature of invincible ignorance more carefully. We remembered that many people who believe in heresies or apostasies do so without having the truth effectively exposed to their hearts. They donāt know, deep down, that they are believing the wrong thing. Some do know, or have the sufficient grace to know, but suppress the truth when it comes. These souls are culpable for the sin of heresy or apostasy ā which is a very terrible sin, the sin of rejecting God. Others donāt know, and even if theyāve been told the truth, that doesnāt mean they necessarily recognize it as truth and suppress that knowledge. Perhaps through upbringing or their circumstances, or their environment, or any number of other factors, they didnāt know the truth as truth even though they came to understand what we believe and perhaps a number of the reasons why.
So thereās a serious issue of culpability that Catholic theologians went over carefully as we began to look into invincible ignorance and its nature and character, especially after we discovered the New World and realized that for centuries people had been living and dying without an inkling of the truth of the Catholic faith, and with no way of receiving this knowledge. Did God create all of them for Hell, or without any chance of salvation, since there were no missionaries in their lands ever?
That was an issue that really started Catholics thinking more carefully about invincible ignorance. They were no longer dealing with a Catholic-only world, where pretty much every heretic was leaving the Catholic faith and many knew it well. The issue of culpability became more serious. How is it just to punish someone who isnāt actually intentionally rejecting the truth? What about the person who accidentally rejects it?
We are incapable of judging a soulās culpability for its heresy, so we arenāt in a position where we can wield justice in a fair way, punishing idolaters or heretics as they deserve. Jesus mentioned in a parable that the wheat and tares should be left to grow up together, because if one plucks out the tares early, one might accidentally pluck up wheat along with them. In the same way, if we judged heretics with the force of law without being able to look into their hearts and see their culpability, we could unjustly punish genuine followers of God who are truly seeking Him to the best of their ability, and are following His will insofar as they have the grace to do so.
This was a truth we only gained through reflection, over a long time, as we really looked into invincible ignorance and culpability for sin more carefully.