Understanding the Trinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Horton
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
  1. You say “not all essences are substantial”. Is Gods essence substantial?
For the first I posted:

Substance is a being whose essence (nature) requires it to exist in itself (a being in itself). It is distinguished from accident, whose essence (nature) is to exist in a substance.

Adam (primary substance) is a human (secondary substance, or universal). God is a primary substance, but has no secondary substance.

The essence of God is substantial. Primary essences are substances. Secondary essences (universals a.k.a., accidents) are not substances (e.g., an essence of white and an essence of musical). Non-substances are accidents, and accidents are ontologically dependent on substances.

A thing could be a substance or not; per Aristotle, things in the world are not beings because they stand under some genus, being, but rather because they all stand in a relation to the primary being, which is substance. Aristotle Metaphysics has ten categories of objects in the world to which words correspond (1) substance; (2) quantity; (3) quality; (4) relatives; (5) somewhere; (6) sometime; (7) being in a position; (8) having; (9) acting; and (10) being acted upon.
  1. You and St.Thomas say that “God is said to be in all things by essence” yet St.Thomas also states " it ought not to be said that God is in things by essence". Can you please explain this?
For the second I posted:

“His substance is present to all things as the cause of their being” means God is in all things as an agent. An agent is present to that upon which it works since an “agent must be joined to that wherein it acts immediately and touch it by its power”. God is not in all things as part of their essence, nor as an accident.

In Summa Theologica, the style of to present an objection, and then answer it. St. Thomas presents the objectioon with “it ought not to be said that God is in things by essence, presence and power” and answers the objection with “God is said to be in all things … by His own essence; because His substance is present to all things as the cause of their being”.

The key is that God’s substance is “present to all things as the cause of their being”. God is the Creator. This is a specific rejection of pantheism and panentheism.
If Gods essence is substantial, and His substance is present TO all things as an agent, then He is not IN all things then Vico. An agent present TO all things remains separate from all things. As Baha’i theology states, “the essence of God surrounds all things”

Is this compatible with your understanding of Catholic teaching?

.
 
Hi. I guess this is out of my depth. :o But my answer would still be the same - if God wants to, He could do it, but He did not. He may be not necessarily do thing according to our human logic, that is why we find we are often puzzled at the things God did. But is it a surprise? Surely not. We were forewarned that God’s way is different from our ways and His thought is not our thought. 😉
Indeed dear Reuben. Please note that while the Father possesses the potentiality to beget or not beget the Son, the Son does not have the potential to beget the Father.

It indeed is a bit out of all our depths, but it must be remembered that some people who believe in one thing, although they don’t fully understand it, use these beliefs as a means to demonise other people’s beliefs, which is extremely harmful.

.
 
hasantas;13546989]What I understand: Father beget Son eternally and Holy Spirit proceed from Father and Son and both are united eternal in essence. That seems regardable for you but for me not.
The Trinity is simple when the intellect understands the difference between divine essence and presence. The Trinity is simple when we do not limit God or place God in a box of carnal understanding. Faith supersedes the intellect here, when it is the Holy Spirit who teaches and reveals spiritual realities to our spirit and heart. No one has seen the Essence of Love, yet all humanity experiences love at different levels. Faith in love can see and speak of spiritual realities describes in spiritual terms.

Trinity is simple Love, eternal existing without no beginning and no end who proceeds from the Father and the Son to space and time for all ages.

Trinity is the simple movement of divine Love in presence to our humanity. I do not understand how one’s intellect cannot grasp (regard) the simple reality of Love who is divine.
There is no any obvious statements or evidence about Trinity in Torah and Bible and Qur’an say that is not true.
Correction; In the Torah of Genesis reveals God sending and proceeding divine Love in creation when God speaks “Let US make man in OUR image”. I do not think you can find a Torah theologian to deny this.

Secondly; before the New Testament is written we find the Incarnate God after He raised from the dead after three days commissioned His Apostles recorded in Mathew’s gospel; “Go out therefore into all the nations and baptize them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit”.

I would agree with your Quran that NO such trinity exist consisting of the Father, the virgin Mary and Jesus. What you disregard as trinity is never the True Trinity God revealed to our humanity.
Trinity was emerged and established in Rome which was generally pagans.
When Jesus revealed the Trinity there were no Christians in Rome. You have been misinformed and do you have a witness or source who was living at the time to make such a far out claim about the Trinity. The Quran does not qualify because it comes into existence 700 years too late, besides the Quran does not teach a correct trinity as taught and revealed by Jesus Christ.
“When God is Father in presence, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is One God in Trinity”
So you talk about three persons and three gods which is polytheism but not one God. You do not say God has three names but you say God is three persons. Because you assume Son and Holy Spirit to have eternal attributes.
You are confusing what is eternal Essence, that does not come down to us, with divine presence who is made known in space and time.

I do not talk about three gods, you are mistaken. I speak about the presence of God revealed distinctly in the Trinity of persons in one name Father, Son and Holy Spirit One God and no other, without confusion or separation.

Do you pretend to believe that God revealed His presence to Adam, Abraham, Moses and the prophet in diverse ways, that the God of Abraham is a multiplicity of god’s (polytheism)?

We do not worship, the cool of day, the covenant of the cutting, a burning bush or the wind these would fall under your misinterpretation of polytheism. We worship the unchanging One God in Trinity who made His divine presence known in all of these, before the fullness of times.

cont;
 
cont;
Father beget Son eternally is not clear. Did God create Son?
No; God does not create His Word =Son, who is God, who is eternally begotten of the Father. When you say God, God is the fullness of the Trinity of persons existing One God, Love eternally present moves.
True Love is not stagnant , that can be falsely placed in a box that does not love or move in love, because this false (love) god cannot love when love here is selfish.
The Trinity is the movement of divine Love eternally present who makes Love known to our humanity in the Trinity (presence) of persons.

When you say the Father eternally begets the Son, under this revelation God’s Love moves, first from the Father who is principle without principle who eternally begets LOVE = the Son, Love in Essence is One God.

Trinity is simple when you place Love in the presence of the Persons of the Trinity for example; The Love the Father has begets Love =Son or sends His Love in the presence of the Son, here Love is not created. It is here where the Father is in the Son and the Son is in the Father.
This love I speak of is not a human love that can change from one moment to another. We humans are parted Love when God is Love. Divine Love existing has no beginning and no end, The Love=Son is eternally begotten of the Father, Love divine revealed in the presence of the Father and the Son reveals a Living Love that moves. The One Spiration of Love = God eternal becomes present and made known to our humanity personally in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Simple Trinity = Love (Father) begets Love (Son) and sends Love (Holy Spirit), Love moves eternally in ONE spiration of Love who is Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), when Love (Holy) proceeds from Love (Father) in, through and from Love (Son) to our hearts and made known so that we can love one another just as the Father loves the Son and the Son loves the Father as Love proceeds and moves in the life the Holy Spirit gives in Love. This Love in Trinity is One God and no other.

The god you don’t regard in Trinity becomes a stagnant god that cannot love outside of itself thus concluding a false god to your regard. The Trinity which the Quran does not reveal. Is God =Love who Love’s or sends His Love to us in the personal love presence of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
If God beget then there should be a time to do that.
One God = Trinity does not beget. The presence of the Father (Love) begets the presence of (Love) the Son. God’s presence in eternity has no beginning and no end, how can one place God in a box and limit God to space and time and hand cuff God’s power to human standards and human thoughts? God = Love is not created, when Love is God.
 
Hi. I guess this is out of my depth. :o But my answer would still be the same - if God wants to, He could do it, but He did not. He may be not necessarily do thing according to our human logic, that is why we find we are often puzzled at the things God did. But is it a surprise? Surely not. We were forewarned that God’s way is different from our ways and His thought is not our thought. 😉
Me too 😃 Lucky we can swim…!

I always look at it simplistically as the theology of it all though interesting, to me just complicates the basics.

First basic is we have been created to Know and Love God. From the beginning God has sent us His Message how God so chose to do so. Issues arise when we do not understand the message and when we Reject Gods Chosen Prophet/Messenger.

If God is One, then it stands to reason all is connected to this oneness. Thus our heart should be searching for this ultimate Unity.

Every thing being of God must likewise give us a reflection of what God wants us to understand.

Now the hard part, is using our free will to sort out what is of God and what is of Man, but is that as hard as we think?

This beings us to a subject like the Trinity and the meaning of it - Does the resulting explanation Divide or does it embrace the Oneness of God.

Then comes the thought, even a simple way of looking at it raises further complications 😉 🤷

So at times one throws hands in the air and says, Heck there is only one God, get over it people and let’s Love God together 😊

God bless and regards Tony
 
Humbly, I would suggest more reflection is required. Maybe go into a quiet space for a few hours alone? 😃

How can it be the Holy Spirit giving you the “Word of God” when He has spoken to 20,000 denominations?

The Holy Spirit should unite not divide. I suggest more reflection, because at this rate you are not reflecting, I’m suggesting…I don’t like to suggest these things… 🙂

.
Where did BXVI talk about division? Let’s keep our hearts and minds focused on the good "spirit "of the matter and evaluate the words of BXVI properly. Again it’s They are… (the Old and New Testament) and not “There are…” 🙂

MJ
 
If Gods essence is substantial, and His substance is present TO all things as an agent, then He is not IN all things then Vico. An agent present TO all things remains separate from all things. As Baha’i theology states, “the essence of God surrounds all things”

Is this compatible with your understanding of Catholic teaching?

.
It may be. Can you tell from this?

This topic is related to divine manifestations, so I think you can see in the quote below, that per Christianity, Jesus Christ is not a divine manifestation as believed by Baha’i, because Jesus Christ is God (not metaphorically but really divine nature). Also, per Catholic teaching, the rational human soul exists only from the moment of physical conception, so a prophet would not have a rational soul prior to incarnation, and would also have the same human nature as all other humans.

Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Ludwig Ott, p. 38:

The substantial omnipresence of God is to be more closely defined as a repletive presence, that is, the whole Divine Essence fills the whole created space and everyone of its parts. On account of the absolute simplicity of God, however, the repletive omnipresence must not be conceived as an infinite extension (expansion or diffusion) of the Divine Substance.

In addition to this general, natural, presence of God, there is also a special supernatural presence or indwelling of God, by the supernatural efficacy of His grace, in the soul of the just man (John 14, 23; I Cor. 3, 16; 6, 19), in the house of God (ps. 131, 13 et seq.) and in Heaven (Mt. 6, 9). The indwelling of God in the humanity of Christ on the basis of the Hypostatic Union is unique (Col. 2, 9 : " In Him dwelleth all the fullnes of the Godhead corporeally ").
 
Me too 😃 Lucky we can swim…!

I always look at it simplistically as the theology of it all though interesting, to me just complicates the basics.

First basic is we have been created to Know and Love God. From the beginning God has sent us His Message how God so chose to do so. Issues arise when we do not understand the message and when we Reject Gods Chosen Prophet/Messenger.

If God is One, then it stands to reason all is connected to this oneness. Thus our heart should be searching for this ultimate Unity.

Every thing being of God must likewise give us a reflection of what God wants us to understand.

Now the hard part, is using our free will to sort out what is of God and what is of Man, but is that as hard as we think?

This beings us to a subject like the Trinity and the meaning of it - Does the resulting explanation Divide or does it embrace the Oneness of God.

Then comes the thought, even a simple way of looking at it raises further complications 😉 🤷

So at times one throws hands in the air and says, Heck there is only one God, get over it people and let’s Love God together 😊

God bless and regards Tony
One can be assured the Church focuses on Unity and always knows it has to Evangelize the Good News even if others “give up” through their own choice. There is only one God. The Church always champions the Almighty. 🙂

MJ
 
It may be. Can you tell from this?

This topic is related to divine manifestations, so I think you can see in the quote below, that per Christianity, Jesus Christ is not a divine manifestation as believed by Baha’i, because Jesus Christ is God (not metaphorically but really divine nature). Also, per Catholic teaching, the rational human soul exists only from the moment of physical conception, so a prophet would not have a rational soul prior to incarnation, and would also have the same human nature as all other humans.

Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma, Ludwig Ott, p. 38:

The substantial omnipresence of God is to be more closely defined as a repletive presence, that is, the whole Divine Essence fills the whole created space and everyone of its parts. On account of the absolute simplicity of God, however, the repletive omnipresence must not be conceived as an infinite extension (expansion or diffusion) of the Divine Substance.

In addition to this general, natural, presence of God, there is also a special supernatural presence or indwelling of God, by the supernatural efficacy of His grace, in the soul of the just man (John 14, 23; I Cor. 3, 16; 6, 19), in the house of God (ps. 131, 13 et seq.) and in Heaven (Mt. 6, 9). The indwelling of God in the humanity of Christ on the basis of the Hypostatic Union is unique (Col. 2, 9 : " In Him dwelleth all the fullnes of the Godhead corporeally ").
Interesting - From a Baha’i viewpoint Christ was Born of the Holy Spirit and I thought that was Biblical as well? Though subject to this world and all its influences, Christ was an incarnation of the Holy Spirit. This is the difference between the Manifestations and Man.

All were born of the Holy Spirit, all are the embodiment of this Spirit and it was not until and event in their lives that this was made fully known.

This is why they were seen on this earth as perfection even as children, their birth right and knowledge is of the Holy Spirit.

It is us man that is given a soul at conception.

All the Manifestations are of the Holy Spirit, the First and the Last, they all share the same Truth, It is God that gives the specific message and the way it is given.

I have enjoyed your conversation with Servant.

God Bless and Regards Tony
 
One can be assured the Church focuses on Unity and always knows it has to Evangelize the Good News even if others “give up” through their own choice. There is only one God. The Church always champions the Almighty. 🙂

MJ
Unity in Diversity needs to be considered. How are the diverse beliefs reconciled to become a harmonious Whole, because as you have offered;

“There is only one God”

People Loved God before there was a doctrine of a Trinity and there are people that Love God after the Doctrine of the Trinity.

It may be time to redefine what it actually means, if it continues to be a cause of Disunity 🤷

God bless and Regards Tony
 
Ar·i·an·ism
ˈerēəˌnizəm/
noun CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY
an influential heresy denying the divinity of Christ, originating with the Alexandrian priest Arius ( circa 250– circa 336). Arianism maintained that the Son of God was created by the Father and was therefore neither coeternal with the Father, nor consubstantial.
 
Interesting - From a Baha’i viewpoint Christ was Born of the Holy Spirit and I thought that was Biblical as well? Though subject to this world and all its influences, Christ was an incarnation of the Holy Spirit. This is the difference between the Manifestations and Man.

All were born of the Holy Spirit, all are the embodiment of this Spirit and it was not until and event in their lives that this was made fully known.

This is why they were seen on this earth as perfection even as children, their birth right and knowledge is of the Holy Spirit.

It is us man that is given a soul at conception.

All the Manifestations are of the Holy Spirit, the First and the Last, they all share the same Truth, It is God that gives the specific message and the way it is given.

I have enjoyed your conversation with Servant.

God Bless and Regards Tony
To be of the Holy Spirit seems to be, in Christian theology, to have the grace (help) of the Holy Spirit. That is different that to be be a divine person (Father, Son, or Holy Spirit). And it is not a metaphor. The Christian teaching is that in Jesus Christ is the hypostatic union of divine and human, and also that where any divine person is present, so are all.
 
Ar·i·an·ism
ˈerēəˌnizəm/
noun CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY
an influential heresy denying the divinity of Christ, originating with the Alexandrian priest Arius ( circa 250– circa 336). Arianism maintained that the Son of God was created by the Father and was therefore neither coeternal with the Father, nor consubstantial.
Then I would have to suggest you are Still looking at it the wrong way 😉

Christ is of the Holy Spirit, Jesus was the Body. Christ is the First and the Last, Jesus the Body born of flesh and blood from the womb of His Mother, was also born of the station of Christ with the Holy Spirit.

This does not deny the Divinity of Christ, but does allow that Divinity to be taken and shown again, to return in the “Glory of the Father”.

I must go so I can come again!

God Bless and Regards Tony
 
To be of the Holy Spirit seems to be, in Christian theology, to have the grace (help) of the Holy Spirit. That is different that to be be a divine person (Father, Son, or Holy Spirit). And it is not a metaphor. The Christian teaching is that in Jesus Christ is the hypostatic union of divine and human, and also that where any divine person is present, so are all.
(After rereading what you said I think there may have been a misunderstanding, but have run out of time to reconsider a reply, thus leave it how it was 😊)

Again Interesting, as I can start to see the fine lines between both understandings - Baha’u’llah has stated that only the Manifestations are born of the Holy Spirit, being the perfect reflection of God’s Attributes. (As per your discussion with servant there is a lot more behind this)

We, man, can NEVER obtain this God given Station but to be a humble servant unto it. This is the Magnificence of Christ and the Prophets. Though born of Flesh they were always more then man. They are all of God and this is all we can ever know about God, what we see of them, hear of them and what was written of or by them.

Man is born of a Soul given at Conception. We partake of the Holy Spirit to the extent we polish the mirrors of our hearts to be able to reflect the Pure word of Christ or Baha’u’llah. The only way we can do this is to be Born Again, that is be born of the knowledge and Love of Jesus the Christ.

We see it as Christ Says in the Bible; The Father is greater than I, but at the same time the Father and I are One.

I apologize for my uneducated ramblings:blush: But the greatness of Christ is that He was Born of the Holy Spirit, this makes His Sacrifice infinitely Immense, as he had all power over His destiny but chose Gods Will to sacrifice Himself for the Sins of Mankind.

God Bless and Regards Tony
 
And the …“Glory of the Father” is Bahá’u’lláh, right ?
This has an answer by Baha’u’llah in a Tablet called the LAWḤ-I-AQDAS (The Most Holy Tablet), also known as “Tablet to the Christians”.

“…Say, Lo! The Father is come, and that which ye were promised in the Kingdom is fulfilled! This is the Word which the Son concealed, when to those around Him He said: ‘Ye cannot bear it now.’ And when the appointed time was fulfilled and the Hour had struck, the Word shone forth above the horizon of the Will of God”.

It is a momentous Tablet and here is a link - reference.bahai.org/en/t/b/TB/tb-3.html

Regards Tony
 
(After rereading what you said I think there may have been a misunderstanding, but have run out of time to reconsider a reply, thus leave it how it was 😊)

Again Interesting, as I can start to see the fine lines between both understandings - Baha’u’llah has stated that only the Manifestations are born of the Holy Spirit, being the perfect reflection of God’s Attributes. (As per your discussion with servant there is a lot more behind this)

We, man, can NEVER obtain this God given Station but to be a humble servant unto it. This is the Magnificence of Christ and the Prophets. Though born of Flesh they were always more then man. They are all of God and this is all we can ever know about God, what we see of them, hear of them and what was written of or by them.

Man is born of a Soul given at Conception. We partake of the Holy Spirit to the extent we polish the mirrors of our hearts to be able to reflect the Pure word of Christ or Baha’u’llah. The only way we can do this is to be Born Again, that is be born of the knowledge and Love of Jesus the Christ.

We see it as Christ Says in the Bible; The Father is greater than I, but at the same time the Father and I are One.

I apologize for my uneducated ramblings:blush: But the greatness of Christ is that He was Born of the Holy Spirit, this makes His Sacrifice infinitely Immense, as he had all power over His destiny but chose Gods Will to sacrifice Himself for the Sins of Mankind.

God Bless and Regards Tony
But excluding Jesus Christ, all men that becomes adopted sons, will partake of the divine nature, as given in 2 Peter 1:44 By whom he hath given us most great and precious promises: that by these you may be made partakers of the divine nature: flying the corruption of that concupiscence which is in the world.

Given in John 5:26 the Son of God is different in that respect, actually having divine nature and human nature:
25 Amen, amen I say unto you, that the hour cometh, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself, so he hath given the Son also to have life in himself: 27 And he hath given him power to do judgment, because he is the Son of man.

St. Thomas Aquinas, in Summa Theologica, also answered this question: Whether Christ as Man is the Adopted Son of God?

I answer that, Sonship belongs properly to the hypostasis or person, not to the nature; whence in the [4112]FP, Q[32], A[3] we have stated that Filiation is a personal property. Now in Christ there is no other than the uncreated person or hypostasis, to Whom it belongs by nature to be the Son. But it has been said above (A[1], ad 2), that the sonship of adoption is a participated likeness of natural sonship: nor can a thing be said to participate in what it has essentially. Therefore Christ, Who is the natural Son of God, can nowise be called an adopted Son.
 
“…Say, Lo! The Father is come, and that which ye were promised in the Kingdom is fulfilled! This is the Word which the Son concealed, when to those around Him He said: ‘Ye cannot bear it now.’ And when the appointed time was fulfilled and the Hour had struck, the Word shone forth above the horizon of the Will of God”.

Regards Tony
So here he is talking about himself ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top