E
exnihilo
Guest
Yes and I don’t agree with that. But would you consider registering books despotic? Where is the line between despotic registration and non despotic registration?
I see your doing it again, just like when you said I don’t mind the term gun grabber. You should practice what you preach.Discuss the issues, not each other please. That is the real deflection.
Besides being inaccurate, it won’t be unconstitutional if we amend the Constitution.Restrictions are unconstitutional and eventually would rise to the level of tyrannical
Maybe there’s a difference between that bumper sticker and saying “we will kill” “gun grabbers”.Are you the type of person who is ‘literally shaking’ when you see ‘Don’t tread on me’ flags on cars?
How many people are killed by books every year in the U.S.?Yes and I don’t agree with that. But would you consider registering books despotic? Where is the line between despotic registration and non despotic registration?
If I legally sold you a gun that you used in a crime, then how could I be responsible? You were a legal buyer who chose to do an illegal thing?Let’s talk about registration.
There, fixed that for you.Good demonstration of America’s very healthy culture of personal freedoms.
So if I work for gun control and restrictions through legislation and constitutional amendment it’s okay for you to kill me.There, fixed that for you.
Well sure, but going after any criminals is risky. That won’t be any different when guns are illegal and those who possess them illegally are criminals.Are you breaking down our doors to do a confiscation search?
That is the situation where your health might be at risk.
I don’t know how thinking saying “we will kill you” to people who disagree politically is troubling is “derogatory”. And if you’re defending constitutional rights in the event the 2nd amendment is repealed gun ownership ceases to be a right.No, I didn’t say that, no matter how you feel.
I simply changed your derogatory term for American culture into a more accurate term.
That being said, yes, as an American serviceman (albeit retired) I will defend everyone’s constitutional, God-given freedoms.
As I said, you would only be held responsible if that person did not pass a background check, but you didn’t bother to check.LeafByNiggle:![]()
If I legally sold you a gun that you used in a crime, then how could I be responsible?Let’s talk about registration.
Encouraging compliance with background checks.What are the ‘obvious benefits’ for LEO with registration?
It’s not for solving crimes. It’s for preventing them.I think Canada found it fairly useless in helping solve crimes,
Assuming 1,000 teams each confiscating 10 guns per day, that’s 300,000 per month. It would take 1,000 months - about 80 years - to confiscate all 300,000,000 guns. But if there was going to be a backlash, it would happen in the first two days, long before any significant degradation of the arsenal.Confiscation doesn’t take years, where did you get that idea?
But his friend who still have guns have plenty of time to react.History has shown that it tends to happen very quickly and usually it starts as a very targeted action. The target has no time nor option but to comply.
To trace responsibility for skipped background checks.If you think the Govt doesn’t really need a registry to confiscate, then why is it important to implement?