T
truagape
Guest
How are they counter the Bible?have agendas spelled out in mission statements and bylaws. Many of these are counter Christianity and the Bible
How are they counter the Bible?have agendas spelled out in mission statements and bylaws. Many of these are counter Christianity and the Bible
There’s plenty of surveys that show the accuracy of the 1-3% percent figure…15%!!! you’ve got to be kidding - even militant gays won’t quote that high a figure. They typically use the 10% figure that Kinsey used which of course was based on a flawed survey within the prison system and has long since been discredited.
- I cant take serious someone’s propaganda that gays make up 1% of the population. iTs just too laughable - Try 15 % and maybe higher if one factors in bisexuals
- To also suggest the gay agenda is some organized controlled thing is like saying the new age agenda is also controlled and organized - wheres these things are a collective of people who hold varying ideas and are about as organized as politicians in their own party
Good link on the gay agenda.By J. Matt Barber
Balance of Power
Americans who self-identify as “gay” or lesbian comprise roughly one to three percent of the population. Yet the homosexual movement — led by extremist homosexual pressure groups like the so-called Human Rights Campaign (HRC) — represent, per capita, one of America’s most powerful and well-funded political lobbies. Consider that HRC and the HRC foundation alone have an annual budget in excess of 50 million.
Through a carefully crafted, decades-old propaganda campaign, homosexual activists have successfully cast homosexuals — many of whom enjoy positions of influence and affluence — as a disadvantaged minority. They have repackaged and sold to the public behaviors which thousands of years of history, every major world religion and uncompromising human biology have long identified as immoral and sexually deviant.
The Goal
As with every major political movement, the homosexual lobby is pushing a specific agenda. It is often called the “gay agenda.” At its core is a concerted effort to remove from society all traditional notions of sexual morality and replace them with the post-modern concept of sexual relativism. That is to say, when it comes to sex, there is never right or wrong. All sexual appetites are “equal.” If it feels good, do it.
cwfa.org/articles/14696/CFI/family/index.htm
To everyone here who opposes homophilia, please read this article, its great!!
It even quotes the very words of the homophile activists!!!
Take this one for example:
(On “same-sex marriage”: “Demand the institution and then wreck it. James Dobson was right about our evil intentions. We just plan to be quicker than he thought.” )
It would also be good to do more scriptural research too. Wouldn’t you agree?.
It would be good to do more psychology research to learn…
Gay issues run counter the Bible when it seeks to portray homosexual conduct as a lifestyle instead of sin.How are they counter the Bible?
Where in the Bible do you find support for this statement?Gay issues run counter the Bible when it seeks to portray homosexual conduct as a lifestyle instead of sin.
I really like the part where it said:Good link on the gay agenda.
Well its true, they do. That’s part of their immoral agenda.wouldn’t it be more productive to post an article, then spend time praying for people instead of all this debate? also, why does some of this sound so hateful? ** like that gay people want to use children as ‘fresh meat’? **huh? i’ll be praying. also have to go catch the end of will and grace re runs.
![]()
Hey don’t blame us Catholic conservatives, its your fellow homophiles who told us about all this, by their words and actions.Wow, so not only do we want to destroy marriage, but we want your children too!
I swear, all this foaming-at-the-mouth rants about how homosexuals want to molest your children and destroy your families sound so familiar. It’s like the new blood libel or something.
Homosexuals do have equal rights in the USA. They have a right to make their choices of behavior. They also have as much a right to marry someone of the opposite sex as a heterosexual person has. They also have the right to freedom of speech expression and assembly (something many homosexual activists try to suppress in the opposition), the right to bear arms, the right to not be subjected to illegal search and seizure, etc… Now it actually seems that they have some rights that heterosexuals do not have. For instance, last I checked if a heterosexual engaged in a public sex act or simulation thereof they would be prosecuted for moral terpitude, but this seems to go on at many homosexual festivals across the USA and not only are they not prosecuted for this scandalous behavior but they are often given police security by municipalities so that they wont be oppressed by Christian “hate mongers” and “homophobes”. I have also noticed that indecent exposure seems to be very prominent at these events.Nonsense. Homosexual persons account for, at most, 3-4% of the general population.
The smaller the percentage of homosexual persons in the USA, the less and less their rights should be equal to those of the heterosexual majority.
Right?
The first Chapter of Romans comes to mind, not that Catholics believe in sola scriptura. Leviticus 18.Where in the Bible do you find support for this statement?
We should meet for coffee sometime. You seem intelligent enough to realize that I’m not a monster, and maybe if you see a gay person in real life, you’ll realize that.Hey don’t blame us Catholic conservatives, its your fellow homophiles who told us about all this, by their words and actions.
Its not so much to molest children as to trick them into experimenting with homophile behavior in the hope that a signifcant number of them will then become homophiles, part of the homophile subculture, and engage in sodomic activities with other/older homnophiles when they grow up.—hence “fresh meat”
In short, homophiles want to infect others with their perversion through the school media and legal system-- “fresh meat”
Foaming at the mouth? look who’s talking.
I can only assume you were “being charitable”.You seem intelligent enough to realize that I’m not a monster