Upcoming Synod & Youth

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracepoole
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m kind of curious about what age range is being counted as “youth” here. I mean, I was teaching intro college classes at 23. At 25 I was a largely self-taught adult convert. That’s fairly within what a lot of people would still consider youth.
 
I’ve heard everything up to 40 which seems a little broad to me. I always thought youth was teenagers and young adults up to about 30.
 
Knowledge and experience to do what, decide what, exactly.
Solve the problems they themselves identify.
Can you specifically state one issue that you have no confidence in catholic youth.
My confidence level isn’t high in anyone my age or younger to speak of matters related to catechesis, theology, or scriptural exegesis.
And what age group?
From the pre-synod preparatory document:
In the following pages, the word “youth” refers to persons who are roughly 16 to 29 years old, while bearing in mind that the term needs to be adapted to local circumstances. In any case, it is good to remember that the term “youth”, in addition to referring to persons, is a stage of life that each generation understands in an unequal, original manner.
 
Solve the problems they themselves identify.
Do we need them to solve the problems, or simply identify them? Because I think there’s still a lot of merit to being able to identify problems for someone else to solve.

Using the SSA example upthread, I could say “I’d like there to be more support for how to live a full Christian life as a single layperson, rather than simply being told what’s not allowed.” I might not have a good solution, but I can point out the problem that there’s a lack of models for healthy emotional intimacy for the unmarried.
 
Perhaps. Yet as I asked earlier in post #62: “What in the pre-synodal document took you by surprise? Is it really true to say that ‘adults do not know what is going on among the youth’? I’d wager it’s not, just as it’s not true to say that youth have no idea what’s going on among adults.”
 
I think it’s fair to say there is some shared experience but many younger people have grown up in a different world with different norms to their parents
 
I doubt “no idea” is true, but I think it’s definitely true that you can get a better idea of how young people are thinking by talking to them.

I agree that the document sounds kind of like someone trying to be “hip” though.
 
Solve the problems they themselves identify.
What specific problem. Would you have an example?
My confidence level isn’t high in anyone my age or younger to speak of matters related to catechesis, theology, or scriptural exegesis.
How many decades removed are you from today’s youth? I know you have kids yourself, it can’t be that many.
What happened to destroy your confidence
From the pre-synod preparatory document:
Ok.

I feel there is an underlying issue perhaps.
Haven’t you met one person at all , in that age group , that has some good ideas
 
But surely we at least need a dialogue with the youth. If their values are against the church maybe we need to take a look at the values and norms they were raised with if only to avoid the same mistakes with future generations.
 
Yet asking and finding out may not equal a solution. Yes, the youth can tell us about the problems they’re experiencing. Why assume they know the answer to these problems?

I’m curious, too. What in the pre-synodal document took you by surprise? Is it really true to say that “adults do not know what is going on among the youth”? I’d wager it’s not, just as it’s not true to say that youth have no idea what’s going on among adults.
I didn’t say the adults have “no idea”. I’m saying that the Church has no means to understand its young people better than the means of asking them and talking to them. And you will never get a young person to share openly with you if you don’t tell them that their opinion matters, and that they can be a part of making some important changes. And you obviously can’t say that as a lie – it has to be true.

What kind of changes? Well, that’s exactly what we have to listen to the young people suggest. It’s exactly what we want feedback in. Some suggestions of adults have had to be rejected – it has largely been 50-80 year olds clamoring for women priests. Some suggestions of young people will have to be rejected. But some can be accepted in great appreciation for the wisdom – yes, wisdom – of the young.

1 Tim 4: “Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.”
 
Last edited:
It will be very difficult for the Church to satisfy them, and I don’t think this should be the mission of the Church. Plus, for decades the Church has launched many initiatives to listen to youths and accompany them.
This is a bit like a mother saying, “We’ve been trying to feed these toddlers so long, and they keep throwing the food off their plate. Let’s starve them instead.” It misunderstands the role of a mother, and thinks that sometimes a mother ought to stop nourishing – when in reality, nourishing is precisely what the mother is there for.

God never stops trying to satisfy us, even though we perpetually stand in His way. We must do likewise with those who are lost.
I would like to say that I don’t believe the Church has excluded youths, instead the youths have excluded themselves. In all the aspects of life, it is obvious that what you youths cherish the most is freedom, freedom without responsibility.
This statement is a massive overgeneralization.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with the ‘nursing mother parabole’. If you have been close to a nursing mother or if you have ever been one, you will agree with me that although they often bend to satisfy their babies or toddlers, there is always a time that they have to say “No, enough is enough”. Love does not mean accepting anything. Also, I don’t see how God is always trying to satisfy us. Godis always God. He may have different relatiionships with us, but He has been God. He does not exist to satisfy whosoever.
 
What specific problem. Would you have an example?
Did you read the pre-synodal document?
How many decades removed are you from today’s youth? I know you have kids yourself, it can’t be that many.
What happened to destroy your confidence
Being a witness to 1970’s+ catechismal efforts.
I feel there is an underlying issue perhaps.
Haven’t you met one person at all , in that age group , that has some good ideas
Come now. Surely you can engage with what a person writes rather than attempting some sort of shabby psychoanalysis. I work daily with those in the youth category as determined by the Vatican. Of course some have good ideas. That isn’t what’s in question here.
 
Listen, no one here has said, “Don’t speak with young people! Don’t hear what they have to say!” It’s a sort of straw man to keep returning to this phantom claim. What people have said is they wonder about the fruitfulness of devoting an entire synod to this particular demographic.

There is an obsession with youth today. It’s idolized. It might be useful to reflect on that and ask whether it’s wise or appropriate. They offer a lot to the community. They also have a lot left to learn. And given how poorly we’ve trained them of late in faith matters, this synod seems to be an example of the blind leading the blind.
 
There is an obsession with youth today.
Taken from an economic viewpoint, I can see why some folks in the Vatican lose sleep at night over young people leaving the church.The young people of today are the bill-payers of tomorrow, and in an operation with such an incredible overhead like the Catholic Church, that is something that has to be taken into account by prudent managers.

And again, from a purely economic standpoint, it’s cold comfort that the Church is growing in Africa. Dioceses in this region are massive cash sinks, highly dependent on cash flow from western countries, especially the US and Germany, where the pool of potential future donors is rapidly drying up.

I don’t think that this synod is going to go very far in slowing down defections. I think everyone is aware that it’s more of a token publicity move.
 
40.png
gracepoole:
There is an obsession with youth today.
Taken from an economic viewpoint, I can see why some folks in the Vatican lose sleep at night over young people leaving the church.The young people of today are the bill-payers of tomorrow, and in an operation with such an incredible overhead like the Catholic Church, that is something that has to be taken into account by prudent managers.

And again, from a purely economic standpoint, it’s cold comfort that the Church is growing in Africa. Dioceses in this region are massive cash sinks, highly dependent on cash flow from western countries, especially the US and Germany, where the pool of potential future donors is rapidly drying up.

I don’t think that this synod is going to go very far in slowing down defections. I think everyone is aware that it’s more of a token publicity move.
That is the most sense, to me, that one might make of this.

Frankly, the idolization of youth and the view of them as consumers are integrally connected.
 
Listen, no one here has said, “Don’t speak with young people! Don’t hear what they have to say!” It’s a sort of straw man to keep returning to this phantom claim. What people have said is they wonder about the fruitfulness of devoting an entire synod to this particular demographic.
Grace, I think you must have misread what I said. I did not create a straw man. I fully recognized that you may well support conversations with young people about the Church. That’s why I specifically said I was supporting conversations advancing changes that will matter. I have gathered that you seem to oppose those sorts of conversations with young people.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with the ‘nursing mother parabole’. If you have been close to a nursing mother or if you have ever been one, you will agree with me that although they often bend to satisfy their babies or toddlers, there is always a time that they have to say “No, enough is enough”.
Permanently? No way.

For a couple hours? Sure. But it remains the mission of the mother to satisfy the child’s needs, just as it remains the mission of the Church to satisfy the needs of young people.
Love does not mean accepting anything.
I certainly never said it did.
Also, I don’t see how God is always trying to satisfy us.
He is always there, at work to satisfy our needs. That is not my opinion; it is the constant teaching of the Church.
 
Did you read the pre-synodal document?
I would prefer not to assume what aspect of the document another takes issue with, I would prefer to discuss specific points.
Being a witness to 1970’s+ catechismal efforts.
The more I read on CAF, the more I get the idea that the 70’s , in the States, were a pretty crazy place.

Being in catholic school in Australia and living in Catholic Communities in Australia, was a good place to be.
Come now. Surely you can engage with what a person writes rather than attempting some sort of shabby psychoanalysis. I work daily with those in the youth category as determined by the Vatican. Of course some have good ideas. That isn’t what’s in question here.
Well given you work daily with youth, state what you find problematic . Otherwise , yes, my conclusion is one of. ‘ why cant she vocalise, or in this case, type, specifics’.
 
Last edited:
I would prefer not to assume what aspect of the document another takes issue with, I would prefer to discuss specific points.
Sorry. I was referring to the document because in it, the youths who gathered in March identified what they see as issues in the Church that need to be addressed. Whatever any of us thinks about the problems we might see, those identified in the document are those that are central here.
The more I read on CAF, the more I get the idea that the 70’s , in the States, were a pretty crazy place.
Yeah, not pretty. Just really watered down catechism. Feel good, let’s-make-banners-and-color kind of stuff. Perhaps this isn’t true for everyone who grew up during this period. For me and mine, however, it definitely was typical. The amount I didn’t know about the faith until adulthood is rather stunning, especially given that I went to Catholic schools. I do have good memories and I’m still Catholic, so that’s something significant. Just a whole lot I didn’t learn that I think I should have learned.
Being in catholic school in Australia and living in Catholic Communities in Australia, was a good place to be.
You are to be envied!
Well given you work daily with youth, state what you find problematic . Otherwise , yes, my conclusion is one of. ‘ why cant she vocalise, or in this case, type, specifics’.
I did try to do so earlier. I work with some of the most committed, passionate young people around. They consistently inspire me. Yet they have A LOT of growing and learning to do. They need A LOT of guidance. And often, their views (while certainly enthusiastic and full of passion) are uneducated. They’re prone to being capricious and inconsistent. While some adults share these traits, these traits are expected of youth because they’re so common.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top