S
seekerz
Guest
Enlighten me then.Exactly. That is why I said you have no idea what unfettered capitalism is.
Enlighten me then.Exactly. That is why I said you have no idea what unfettered capitalism is.
And by that you mean…?London’s ‘poor and needy’ are showing where unlimited government subsidy leads.
No. But you seem to forget that the greedy government has been a major contributor to the rising cost of health care and can hardly be looked to for guidence in controlling run away costs.And that makes greed okay?
Gladly.Enlighten me then.
We don’t have that.In economics, laissez-faire describes an environment in which transactions between private parties are free from state intervention, including restrictive regulations, taxes, tariffs and enforced monopolies
You were the one who brought the government into the fray as the solution you seem to imagine I would prefer. I’m not sure I agree that government and profit-at-all-cost companies are on opposite sides at all…No. But you seem to forget that the greedy government has been a major contributor to the rising cost of health care and can hardly be looked to for guidence in controlling run away costs.
I am well aware of what “laissez-faire” means (took French in high school) and it exactly describes to me the attitudes that led to the recent Wall Street fiasco. What does it matter how many government regulations exist if they don’t have the effect of restraining greed and profiteering at the expense of the less powerful?
It matters when discussing unfettered capitalism aka laissez-faire capitalism and incorrectly attributing it to our situation.I am well aware of what “laissez-faire” means (took French in high school) and it exactly describes to me the attitudes that led to the recent Wall Street fiasco. What does it matter how many government regulations exist if they don’t have the effect of restraining greed and profiteering at the expense of the less powerful?
Throwing money at a problem never solves it but it does keep liberals from having to get dirty.And by that you mean…?
Ad hominem? Pot calls kettle black.The spin attacks and ad hominems certainly make me believe I am right in my views. They lack adding any valid information to the discussion, as well as any charity. It seems to be a tactic to promote a political agenda only and reeks of ‘everyone for themselves’.
Actually the mortgage crisis was the direct result of government intervention and regulation in the mortgage markets. Then the FEC’s mark to market rule was the primary contributor the liqudity crisis that led to the massive TARP bailouts. Unfettered capitalism had little to do with any of it.I am well aware of what “laissez-faire” means (took French in high school) and it exactly describes to me the attitudes that led to the recent Wall Street fiasco.
Actually the mortgage crisis was the direct result of government intervention and regulation in the mortgage markets. Then the FEC’s mark to market rule was the primary contributor the liqudity crisis that led to the massive TARP bailouts. Unfettered capitalism had little to do with any of it.
I dispute that my this attribution is incorrect: ineffective regulation = no regulation in my book.It matters when discussing unfettered capitalism aka laissez-faire capitalism and incorrectly attributing it to our situation.
That’s nice. So? I dispute your dispute as inaccurate.I dispute that my this attribution is incorrect: ineffective regulation = no regulation in my book.
So government regulation is what caused financial firms and banks to practice predatory investment practices even when they knew these practices were unsustainable?
Yes, Barney Frank. Even he says so…Actually the mortgage crisis was the direct result of government intervention and regulation in the mortgage markets. Then the FEC’s mark to market rule was the primary contributor the liqudity crisis that led to the massive TARP bailouts. Unfettered capitalism had little to do with any of it.
Who forced them to open up lending and loosend lending requirements? Who repealed Glass Stegal?So government regulation is what caused financial firms and banks to practice predatory investment practices even when they knew these practices were unsustainable?
Sorry, I’m having trouble understanding you - did the government throw money at the rioters?!Throwing money at a problem never solves it but it does keep liberals from having to get dirty.
Yes.So government regulation is what caused financial firms and banks to practice predatory investment practices even when they knew these practices were unsustainable?
:clapping:I have posted articles in other threads; however, your ad hominem statements grow old and lack charity. I will not be responding to such tactics.
My whining is me sharing what I believe the Gospels teach. Your remark is offensive to say the least, not only towards me but the teachings I believe in.
And continue to do so.Sorry, I’m having trouble understanding you - did the government throw money at the rioters?!![]()