US Coast Guard allows officer to refuse vaccination on moral grounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul2274
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Paul2274

Guest
Stay-at-Home Dad of 3… is me!

Did anyone else know about how this vaccine is made?
I’m stunned… I have to check my medical records now and find out. I will be very sad if I have.

cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=58527

US Coast Guard allows officer to refuse vaccination on moral grounds

Washington, May. 20, 2008 (LifesiteNews.com/CWN) - US Coast Guard officials have backed down in the face of pressure from a pro-life law firm that recently filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Coast Guard officer who, officials told him, must submit to a vaccine that was derived based on fetal tissue from abortions.

Lt. Cmmdr. Joseph Healy, who is Catholic, said the vaccine’s derivation violates his pro-life moral and religious beliefs.

Coast Guard officials who initially refused to excuse an officer from the injection relented after the Alliance Defense Fund filed the suit. Last week, the Coast Guard notified the US District Court for the District of Columbia that it will grant Healy a religious exemption. As a result, ADF attorneys plan to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit they filed for Healy in January.

“Christians shouldn’t be punished for abiding by their beliefs against abortion. The Coast Guard has done the right thing in recognizing that those who lay their life on the line to defend our shores are entitled to the same freedom as anyone else not to have their particular beliefs disregarded," ADF attorney Matt Bowman told LifeNews.com.

“Members of the U.S. military should never be forced to make an unconstitutional choice between honoring their country and adhering to the belief that health and medicine can prosper without exploiting the killing of pre-born children,” Bowman said.

In May 2006, the Coast Guard, which requires its personnel to be vaccinated against a variety of diseases, ordered all active-duty personnel to receive one of two vaccines against Hepatitis A or show proof of immunity. The vaccines are derived from cells taken from the lung tissue of a child who was electively aborted at 14 weeks gestation and then dissected.

The Coast Guard allows religious exemptions for those who hold a “religious tenet or belief contrary to immunization.” In compliance with Coast Guard requirements, Healy submitted a memo requesting religious exemption based on his Catholic faith and strong opposition to abortion. In response, Capt. Brent Pennington denied the request because he disagreed with Healy’s theology, claiming that Catholic teaching “does not state that these immunizations are against the religious tenets of the Catholic Church.” With the denial, Healy could have been forced, under threat of severe penalty, to receive the immunization against his will. ADF attorneys had also filed a motion to prevent that from occurring while the lawsuit moved forward.

“Those who lay their life on the line to defend our shores are entitled to the same religious freedoms as anyone else,” Bowman concluded. “Members of the U.S. military should never be forced to make an unconstitutional choice between honoring their country and honoring their faith.”
 
Dear Friends,

Thank you for posting this article about my vaccine issue with the Coast Guard. It’s not the Coast Guard that’s wrong (in fact, I applaud them for granting my exemption request); it’s the fact that aborted babies are used to make some vaccines, including new vaccines that are still in development.

Regarding the hepatitis B vaccine, it’s fine, as long as it’s not the combined A/B (since it contains the abortion-tainted hep A vaccine).

You can see the list of abortion-tainted vaccines an any alternatives at cogforlife.org/fetalvaccines.htm.

God bless,

Joe Healy
 
I had no idea that some vaccines used the tissue from aborted babies. I’m stunned. :eek: Why isn’t this more common knowledge?
I just found this article:

cogforlife.org/ncr.htm
discussed widely on these forums, and specific details can also be found in links on Judie Brown’s section of EWTN Q&A by searching “vaccines” or “vaccinations”
 
This is sick - I had no idea so many vaccines were developed immorally. How is this information not in some massive email forward, sent over the internet two or three times over by now? 😦
 
I had no idea that some vaccines used the tissue from aborted babies.
Technically, the cells from a single baby aborted back in the 60s or 70s are used in the production of the vaccine.

I’m sure this has been posted on some other thread about this issue, but here’s a Vatican document talking about the moral issues involved with this and a few other vaccines.

news story: cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=38498
Vatican letter:
cogforlife.org/vaticanresponse.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top