US: Immunity offered to certain immigrants

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration will stop deporting and begin granting work permits to younger illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have since led law-abiding lives. The election-year initiative addresses a top priority of an influential Latino electorate that has been vocal in its opposition to administration deportation policies.

The policy change, described to The Associated Press by two senior administration officials, will affect as many as 800,000 immigrants who have lived in fear of deportation. It also bypasses Congress and partially achieves the goals of the so-called DREAM Act, a long-sought but never enacted plan to establish a path toward citizenship for young people who came to the United States illegally but who have attended college or served in the military.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was to announce the new policy Friday, one week before President Barack Obama plans to address the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials’ annual conference in Orlando, Fla. Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney is scheduled to speak to the group on Thursday.

Under the administration plan, illegal immigrants will be immune from deportation if they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED, or served in the military. They also can apply for a work permit that will be good for two years with no limits on how many times it can be renewed. The officials who described the plan spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss it in advance of the official announcement.

google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2rMiN8T4NLCHPB0pl-VRWCATxyg?docId=3260ee1dbc2f43638498e4b4e9aae1e3
 
Just curious, when does the president decide what is legal and what is illegal while completely ignoring the laws as written? Sounds more like the act of a king or a dictator than that of a president of a republic.
 
Just curious, when does the president decide what is legal and what is illegal while completely ignoring the laws as written? Sounds more like the act of a king or a dictator than that of a president of a republic.
Now he just has to figure out how to give them voting rights by November!
 
Finally some good news!! What a relief for many young people 🙂 So happy for them and their families…God bless
 
Finally some good news!! What a relief for many young people 🙂 So happy for them and their families…God bless
Yes because more unemployed young people are just what this country needs. With 20%+ unemployment in the 18 to 25 year old range how can this possibly be a bad thing?
 
Yes because more unemployed young people are just what this country needs. With 20%+ unemployment in the 18 to 25 year old range how can this possibly be a bad thing?
Not to worry, MS-13 is always “hiring” 🙂
 
Yes because more unemployed young people are just what this country needs. With 20%+ unemployment in the 18 to 25 year old range how can this possibly be a bad thing?
They have already been here anyway. Illegal immigrants will be immune from deportation if they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED, or served in the military

young people who were brought to this country as children and know only this country as home. As a general matter, these individuals lacked the intent to violate the law…

Our Nation’ s immigration laws must be enforced in a strong and sensible manner. They are not designed to be blindly enforced without consideration given to the individual circumstances of each case. …

…Prosecutorial discretion, which is used in so many other areas, is especially justified here.

It is better than splitting up the family.
 
What part of the word illegal doesn’t the White House understand? The only right an illegal immigrant in this country has is a seat on the next bus to whatever country they are from.
 
Just curious, when does the president decide what is legal and what is illegal while completely ignoring the laws as written? Sounds more like the act of a king or a dictator than that of a president of a republic.
If you don’t like the law, ignore it.

If you don’t like the population you have, change it.
 
And the degree of intensity in which America declines increases ten-fold. To all you Leftists, how come Mexico doesn’t give any consideration for their illegal immigrants? :rolleyes:
 
What about all the millions of people who are seeking an American visa (for holidays and for moving permanently), who are going through the legal route, especially students, homemakers etc. who are having so much difficulty getting to the US because of all the illegal immigrants that are there. It is not right, all people should be treated with dignity, but this is rewarding breaking the law, even if they did not do it directly, it will act as a magnet for illegal immigration.
 
And the degree of intensity in which America declines increases ten-fold. To all you Leftists, how come Mexico doesn’t give any consideration for their illegal immigrants? :rolleyes:
And the dregee of animosity toward our less fortunate yonger brothers and sisters intensifies… “Leftist” :rolleyes:

Benedict has calibrated his immigration stance with care, stating the need to protect family unity and immigrants’ human rights, but pointedly avoiding any specifics of the American immigration debate, like the issue of whether to grant legal status to illegal immigrants. Yet last week his visit quickly stirred the crosscurrents of the debate.

nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20catholics.html?pagewanted=all
 
I can’t wait to hear the defenders justify this.
ALICIA A. CALDWELL
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) – The Obama administration will stop deporting and begin granting work permits to younger illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have since led law-abiding lives. The election-year initiative addresses a top priority of an influential Latino electorate that has been vocal in its opposition to administration deportation policies.
The policy change, described to The Associated Press by two senior administration officials, will affect as many as 800,000 immigrants who have lived in fear of deportation. It also bypasses Congress and partially achieves the goals of the so-called DREAM Act, a long-sought but never enacted plan to establish a path toward citizenship for young people who came to the United States illegally but who have attended college or served in the military.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano was to announce the new policy Friday, one week before President Barack Obama plans to address the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials’ annual conference in Orlando, Fla. Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney is scheduled to speak to the group on Thursday.
Obama planned to discuss the new policy Friday afternoon from the White House Rose Garden.
 
And the dregee of animosity toward our less fortunate yonger brothers and sisters intensifies… “Leftist” :rolleyes:

Benedict has calibrated his immigration stance with care, stating the need to protect family unity and immigrants’ human rights, but pointedly avoiding any specifics of the American immigration debate, like the issue of whether to grant legal status to illegal immigrants. Yet last week his visit quickly stirred the crosscurrents of the debate.

nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/20catholics.html?pagewanted=all
You can still say something without actually invoking the country in question. I could say “Nations should not seek to wipe other nations off the face of the Earth.” Just before I make a visit to Tehran…it doesn’t take a genius to figure out who I was referring to.

Sadly what the Pope doesn’t realize is the devastating effect of Balkanization and how it led to the senseless slaughter and raping of many people in Yugoslavia.

More importantly the United States is the most liberal when it comes to immigration. We let in more immigrants than all other industrial nation combined. So don’t speak as though the US is harsh. Mexico is far more harsher with their illegal immigrants, yet where is the overwhelming outcry? :rolleyes:

Regardless this idea of dictating policy based on sympathy is just utter naive and foolish. Does that mean we shouldn’t send criminals to jail because they may break up their family?
 
Under the administration plan, illegal immigrants will be immune from deportation if they were brought to the United States before they turned 16 and are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a U.S. high school or earned a GED, or served in the military. They also can apply for a work permit that will be good for two years with no limits on how many times it can be renewed. The officials who described the plan spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss it in advance of the official announcement.

google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2rMiN8T4NLCHPB0pl-VRWCATxyg?docId=3260ee1dbc2f43638498e4b4e9aae1e3
Next, of course, there will be a hue and cry over those who illegally entered the U.S. before they were 17 and are under 35 and have been here for four years, and are only one year away from their GED. And they will then be amnestied.

Then, we’ll need to worry about those who entered before they were 18 and are under the age of 36, and so on, and so on.

Oh! The unfairness of it!

See if it doesn’t happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top