Why would he care? Why would you want to waste your money?Am I the only one that feels tempted to put one of these on a postcard and send it to Richard Dawkins?:newidea:
![]()
Interesting - I didn’t realize there was that personal connection between the two. I’ll have to read more about this.You may recall Dawkins gave testimony at the Vatican against the cause of Mother Theresa, and did so in a very public way, all but promising he was going to single-handedly squash any chance they would have of finding she led a virtuous life. He wasn’t very happy to find out she had more witnesses testify to the virtuous character of her life than any saint or prospective canonized ever. Dawkins thinks her entire life’s story is basically media spin, she didn’t deserve the Nobel in 1979, and believes history should discount and forget her.
Wasn’t it Christopher Hitchens, not Dawkins, who “testified” against the beatification of Mother Teresa? huffingtonpost.com/2007/08/29/hitchens-takes-on-mother-_n_62437.htmlYou may recall Dawkins gave testimony at the Vatican against the cause of Mother Theresa, and did so in a very public way, all but promising he was going to single-handedly squash any chance they would have of finding she led a virtuous life. He wasn’t very happy to find out she had more witnesses testify to the virtuous character of her life than any saint or prospective canonized ever. Dawkins thinks her entire life’s story is basically media spin, she didn’t deserve the Nobel in 1979, and believes history should discount and forget her.
So I don’t think atheism’s latest favored son would be very pleased to find the US Government recognizing Bl. Mother Theresa had something positive to give the world.
I hoped it obvious that my remark was tongue-in-cheek, and that I wouldn’t really do that to Mr. Dawkins because it would be against charity to do so. It was nothing more than whimsical thought.