1
1holycatholic
Guest
Yeah. Just don’t hold your breath waiting for the ultra-rightwing to bring articles of impeachment against him.![]()
I had no idea Dennis Kucinich was considered “ultra-rightwing” sic].
Yeah. Just don’t hold your breath waiting for the ultra-rightwing to bring articles of impeachment against him.![]()
Then Bush 41 would’ve had to be impeached as well.Just or not the Constitution spells out the criteria the President needs to follow. He failed to do so and should be impeached.
Then Bush 41 would’ve had to be impeached as well.
However, Article VI of the Constitution gives the president the authority to use military force in accord with the UN treaty ratified by congress in 1948.
Jim
The UN Charter ratified by Congress in 1948, is a treaty in which past and present president’s have used to give them the authority to uphold UN resolutions using US military force. Its debatable.This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
Bush went into Iraq with the consent of Congress but without the consent of the UN. Obama went to war with Libya with the consent of the UN but without the consent of Congress. Of the two, I would prefer that the president be accountable to the Congress than to the UN.The UN Charter ratified by Congress in 1948, is a treaty in which past and present president’s have used to give them the authority to uphold UN resolutions using US military force. Its debatable.
When George Bush went into Iraq, it was considered illegal because under the UN Charter, nations were not to act unilaterally on an action rejected by the UN.
Again, its debatable.
And under the agreements of the UN Charter, it was considered illegal, but of course its debatable.Bush went into Iraq with the consent of Congress but without the consent of the UN.
and again, debatable.Obama went to war with Libya with the consent of the UN but without the consent of Congress.
Me too. But for anyone to suggest that Obama commited an impeachable act, is not being objectively fair.Of the two, I would prefer that the president be accountable to the Congress than to the UN.
Its why Denis Kucinich and Ron Paul are on the same side in their desire to put legislation together to prevent presidents from ever using military force without Congressional Approval.It is surely true that we have not had a formal declaration of war since WWII despite being involved in a myriad of wars in the past decades. Presidents have become too indifferent to their Constitutional obligations … and congress has abetted them. It’s a bad situation that ought to be addressed, but one which congress seems loath to touch.
Bush went into Iraq with the consent of Congress but without the consent of the UN. Obama went to war with Libya with the consent of the UN but without the consent of Congress. Of the two, I would prefer that the president be accountable to the Congress than to the UN.The UN Charter ratified by Congress in 1948, is a treaty in which past and present president’s have used to give them the authority to uphold UN resolutions using US military force. Its debatable.
When George Bush went into Iraq, it was considered illegal because under the UN Charter, nations were not to act unilaterally on an action rejected by the UN.
Again, its debatable.