USDA gay-sensitivity training seeks larger audience

  • Thread starter Thread starter markomalley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

markomalley

Guest
From the Washington Times:U.S. Department of Agriculture activists want to impose their intense brand of homosexual sensitivity training governmentwide, including a discussion that compares “heterosexism” - believing marriage can be between only one man and one woman - to racism.

If accepted by the Obama administration, that move could mean more sessions for military service members already undergoing gay-sensitivity indoctrination. Critics fear additional gay-oriented training would add an unnecessary burden for combat troops and encourage some to leave.

USDA officials have asked the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which oversees all federal employee policies, to impose its gay-awareness programs on all federal departments, according to an internal newsletter. The training includes a discussion of “heterosexism” and compares it to racism. It says people who view marriage as being between only one man and one woman are guilty of “heterosexism.”
You can take a look at a USDA Diversity Training slide deck (PDF format) here (from a USDA site). Another EEO training (for supervisors) in PPT format can be viewed on Google Docs here. (You can download the PPT file from here). Those two presentations validate the factual information contained in the USDA “diversity training.”

From slide 16-17 of the first slide deck:
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/111/57023360671.jpg
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5893/1121i.jpg

Comment:

So we have degenerated from “just leave us alone” to a “heterosexist” being equated with a racist by an agency of the US government.

Therefore, if one believes:
*- “Homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and can in no case be approved of” (ref)
  • The homosexual inclination “itself must be seen as an objective disorder” (ref)
  • “Sexual orientation” does not constitute a quality comparable to race, ethnic background, etc. in respect to non-discrimination (ref).
  • There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family. And therefore, it is the obligation of all Catholics to “refrain from any kind of formal cooperation in the enactment or application of such gravely unjust laws and, as far as possible, from material cooperation on the level of their application” (ref)*
Then I guess that means, in the eyes of at least one agency of the Federal Government, one is a bad person and no better than a member of the Klan. (BTW, you may wish to click on the “ref” links above to see what horrible people made all of those intolerant statements)
 
Did you see the poll where most Americans thought that gays made up some 24% of the population? And they actually make up around 5%, and wield this amount of power and influence? I think there’s more to a lot of this than just the gay movement. There is a secular humanist/militant atheist movement that is out to destroy any orthodox church that preaches a strong moral code. There are some very dark days ahead for the church.
 
Did you see the poll where most Americans thought that gays made up some 24% of the population? And they actually make up around 5%, and wield this amount of power and influence? I think there’s more to a lot of this than just the gay movement. There is a secular humanist/militant atheist movement that is out to destroy any orthodox church that preaches a strong moral code. There are some very dark days ahead for the church.
Homosexual people actually make up even a smaller portion of the population than 5%. It seems that a “thought” police state is becoming a reality. Heterosexism? Another coined pejorative term designed to inspire defensiveness in people that understand the obvious, the act of sex is procreative at its core and heterosexual in nature.
 
Did you see the poll where most Americans thought that gays made up some 24% of the population? And they actually make up around 5%, and wield this amount of power and influence? I think there’s more to a lot of this than just the gay movement. There is a secular humanist/militant atheist movement that is out to destroy any orthodox church that preaches a strong moral code.** There are some very dark days ahead for the church.**
Quoted for truth. The enemies of the Church ally themselves for an ultimate assault. I’ve said it many times and I’ll repeat it: if it weren’t for Christ’s promise that the gates of hell shall not prevail, I think the Church as we know her would be silenced in one generation.
 
Did you see the poll where most Americans thought that gays made up some 24% of the population? And they actually make up around 5%, and wield this amount of power and influence? I think there’s more to a lot of this than just the gay movement. There is a secular humanist/militant atheist movement that is out to destroy any orthodox church that preaches a strong moral code. There are some very dark days ahead for the church.
Actually, I saw a poll where it was found the percentage of true homosexuals is actually less than that. More like 1 or 2%.
 
Homosexual people actually make up even a smaller portion of the population than 5%. It seems that a “thought” police state is becoming a reality. Heterosexism? Another coined pejorative term designed to inspire defensiveness in people that understand the obvious, the act of sex is procreative at its core and heterosexual in nature.
👍
 
first of all, homosexuality has nothing to do with agriculture. They should stick to issues on farming.

Second of all, if preserving American culture (european christian values) makes me a heterosexist, then I am a proud one.

Thirdly, I think this shows Barrack Obama is starting to resort to childish name calling of the otherside of the poltical aisle. Now he wants to viciously attack us for our beliefs.
 
“Diversity Training” within the federal workforce has been going on for a long time. I didn’t particularly like it when it first started, and it has become more and more oppressive as time goes on. I’d like to see some diversity training for the toleration of Catholic values.
 
“Diversity Training” within the federal workforce has been going on for a long time. I didn’t particularly like it when it first started, and it has become more and more oppressive as time goes on. I’d like to see some diversity training for the toleration of Catholic values.
You heterosexist religist, you. How dare you!!!

😉
 
interesting…so the government is not an equal opportunity employer

ANY person of ANY faith that believes that homosexuality is immoral and will not deny this belief need not apply

fascinating how we (America) promote religious freedom in one breathe and then this in the next
 
I note that the PowerPoint slide lists “Don Ask, Don’t Tell” and the Defense of Marriage Act as examples of “heterosexism.”

Hmm, I wonder, in creating Adam and Eve, was God the first heterosexist?
 
I note that the PowerPoint slide lists “Don Ask, Don’t Tell” and the Defense of Marriage Act as examples of “heterosexism.”

Hmm, I wonder, in creating Adam and Eve, was God the first heterosexist?
:rotfl:

Just makes us a little more Godly. 👋
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top