Thank you for this info.I read an article posted on Lifesite News by Jill Stanek that led me to believe these vaccines were developed directly from cells of aborted fetuses.From the National Catholic Bioethics Center:
FAQ on vaccine use
The morality of vaccinating our children
There is no causal link between autism and vaccines. Multiple quality studies have shown this. The original claimant has been discredited.Thank you for this info.I read an article posted on Lifesite News by Jill Stanek that led me to believe these vaccines were developed directly from cells of aborted fetuses.
Having said that,another concern is,based on comprehensive data from several different countries ,including the USA,that the rise in autism is directly related to these vaccines.As many as one in one hundred fifty children is diagnosed with autism. This spike manifested in the late seventies,when this formula replaced animal cells.Also an increased incidence of leukemia and lymphoma in children.
Yes I am aware that the original claim re the binding material in vaccines has been debunked.This article I mentioned in my prior post is referencing the spike in autism after the use of fetal cells was implemented.There is no causal link between autism and vaccines. Multiple quality studies have shown this. The original claimant has been discredited.
autismspeaks.org/science/policy-statements/information-about-vaccines-and-autism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy
nytimes.com/2011/04/24/magazine/mag-24Autism-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Yes, cells derived from two aborted fetuses are used in the production of some vaccines.I do believe we need to discuss this more, not less! Peacefully as possible (I don’t care how jacked-up you get but apparently that’s frowned upon here!)
Have you heard there are fetal cells in some vaccines and do you think that this is widely known?
Thanks for the link. The NBC relies on Catholic doctrine when presenting issues.From the National Catholic Bioethics Center:
FAQ on vaccine use
The morality of vaccinating our children
“To prove” means that the issue is beyond doubt. Such a claim is beyond the current scope, and totally off topic, as this is about the use of fetal cells in vaccines, not the general anti-vax, pro-vax hoopla. In any case, it takes little time to spot the logical disconnect in that article.
cogforlife.org/vaticanresponse.htmAs regards the diseases against which there are no alternative vaccines which are available and ethically acceptable, it is right to abstain from using these vaccines if it can be done without causing children, and indirectly the population as a whole, to undergo significant risks to their health. However, if the latter are exposed to considerable dangers to their health, vaccines with moral problems pertaining to them may also be used on a temporary basis. The moral reason is that the duty to avoid passive material cooperation is not obligatory if there is grave inconvenience. Moreover, we find, in such a case, a. proportional reason, in order to accept the use of these vaccines in the presence of the danger of favouring the spread of the pathological agent, due to the lack of vaccination of children. This is particularly true in the case of vaccination against German measles15.
Your link has no chart. No chart can relate causation though. In any case, autism is not a moral topic here.No, please, look at the charts. I know it takes a long time to sort it all out, but it is beyond a doubt if you look at the charts.
Then tell me what you think.
What you can see at this site (which presents “data” of seriously questionable integrity) is that, by their own admission, rates of autism coincide with a rise in the use of certain vaccines.cogforlife.org/autism/
This link is from a catholic org. it shows charts that prove that there is a link to vaccines and autism. I do believe that there is a link, I have seen that with a child I know, but I had to see the charts in order to believe it. The charts rise in the same way for every state and country that vacs. are introduced in. You can see for yourself at the cogfl web site.
Correlation can also point to a third variable that contributes to both of the other two in some way.Correlation may point to causation.
This is a valid point.Yet I have to wonder,why the spectrum was broadened to include even the most nuanced symptoms?Is there an agenda in place?The rise in cases of autism could be entirely explained by the fact that the diagnostic criteria has been broadened over the years, and that more parents are aware of it and getting their kids tested.