Valedictorian delivers speech with bullhorn after Catholic HS ban

  • Thread starter Thread starter anikins
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A few years ago there was the kid with celiac disease whose family made a big deal about the communion wafers and took it to the press about how mean the Catholic Church was to not use soy wafers for communion.
I seriously doubt what you’re saying, because everyone knows that there is no gluten in communion wine.
I’m getting the sense from the article that the kid and his parents are trying to make a Big Point by enrolling him in Catholic school and turning him loose to rabble-rouse.
Or maybe they are Catholic and happen to have a gender non-conforming kids who identifies as gay.

After reading the speech and some of the comments on this thread, I think the kid and parents are right about this decision being driven by anti-LGBTQ bias, which of course is contrary to Church doctrine.

That young man did nothing wrong and he should not have been treated differently in any way by the school or the Archdiocese. The reason why the Church gets a bad rap in the popular press is because folks in the church do bad things in its name.

Like this.
 
After reading the speech and some of the comments on this thread, I think the kid and parents are right about this decision being driven by anti-LGBTQ bias,
I concur.
The reason why the Church gets a bad rap in the popular press is because folks in the church do bad things in its name.
Exactly. And with excruciating frequency and regularity, I might add. Never a week goes by without some similar story getting nationwide press coverage.
 
Last edited:
I know, I know, some won’t like that I am linking to Buzzfeed but it has further information.
Thank you for posting this article. You’re right, it does provide a lot more information. However, it does trouble me that you’re worried about what “some” folks think about Buzzfeed. Don’t let the bullies censor you. That’s how they win.

I think the young man in the story was dead right when he said, “The diocese definitely burned itself with this one” Seems like some folks are really dead set on doing things that will just drag the Church through the mud. For years the Catholic school supported this young man’s gender non-conforming style (because lipstick on a boy is not a sin) and some idiot at the diocese makes a dumb decision that blows the whole thing.

It’s so frustrating.
 
All Catholic schools should maintain a strict dress code, pre-K through 12. This kid’s behaviour was far too condoned, long before he selfishly picked up a bullhorn and delivered his rant.
 
Very prideful. Well, his 15 minutes of “fame” is fleeting fast. Maybe he’ll grow up someday and realize it’s not all about him.
 
I read it too and didn’t find anything that contradicts Church teaching.

However, are we sure that’s the same speech which the Church reviewed before banning it ?

We may be seeing an edited version.

Jim
 
For years the Catholic school supported this young man’s gender non-conforming style (because lipstick on a boy is not a sin) and some idiot at the diocese makes a dumb decision that blows the whole thing.
This is totally rash, and you should not call anyone an “idiot” when you lack the information to understand the situation. As a more prudent poster noted:
However, are we sure that’s the same speech which the Church reviewed before banning it ?

We may be seeing an edited version.
There is too much history for anyone to second guess based on news stories. If he did come out as gay, there would be some very serious concerns having him speak at a Catholic high school graduation.
 
It’s the “junior knows best” generation raised on Disney youth-empowerment themes.

 
That is an amazing article, and probably deserves its own thread. The depth of ignorance in it staggers me. Yet there is one commonality: people misunderstand the Church. The Church does not “make the rules.” The Church discerns what is true and real, whether it be valid matter for the Eucharist, or the theology of the body.
 
Yes, it happened over 10 years ago, but it caused an enormous brouhaha when it did, even though there are workarounds to these situations, but the girl’s family seemed bent on making a Big Deal.

And this young man isn’t even a Catholic. Dollars to donuts this was an orchestrated plan from the get-go.
 
Being gay would not have driven the Bishop’s to ban his speech, for the Catechism itselfs says people of same sex orientation are not to be discriminated against, but to be treated with respect, compassion and sensitivity.

Rather, it was the context of what was in his speech which was rejected.

Jim
 
And from the articles linked in this thread, it seems like the young man has a history for scandalous behavior. I think the administration was more concerned about how he would deliver the speech than the speech itself. Without knowing about the school or the context of the events he mentions, the speech just appears self-centered and antagonistic.
 
Supposedly the speech he was going to read was posted in this thread, but I’m skeptical as there was nothing contradicting Catholic doctrine in it.

Jim
 
I think the administration at a high school needs to give the students asked to give speeches the principal’s prepared speech: that is, a rough draft of what will be said if any student speaker gets the hook because he decided that he can say anything he wants because they’re not going to take his diploma away.

"Thank you, Mr./Ms. [name]. I unfortunately need to read a statement that was furnished to Mr./Ms. Name before he/she agreed to give today’s address. It reads like this:

Mr/Ms [name], you have rightly been named among the finest scholars our school has produced. It is unfortunate that you chose to disrupt our ceremonies as you did today. We talked in advance about respecting both your goals and ours for this gathering before you agreed to be today’s speaker. I wish I did not have to chide our finest scholar on his graduation day, but on behalf of those you offended, I must again repeat the principle you were taught, which is this: Not even the greatest achievement entitles an accomplished person to be deliberately rude to others. We are still very proud of your accomplishments here as a scholar. We have no doubt you will make fine contributions to our world. We also have no doubt that you are capable of learning from this experience and doing a better job in the future of balancing your objectives with the legitimate objectives and goals of others. Now, on to our next speaker
…"

In other words, let him know that if he gets that bullhorn he brought along as a “prop” anywhere near his mouth, that (a) he was going to be given the hook and (b) he was going to be given a lesson on arrogance in front of everyone because of his deliberate choice to rudely spurn the agreed-upon boundaries.

As for what was or wasn’t in the speech? It is the school’s ceremony. They have the right to make the boundaries, and they do not owe anyone an explanation for that. They owe the speaker an opportunity to be absolutely certain his speech is acceptable and the right to choose not to speak. That is all.
 
Last edited:
Wonder why he didn’t bring up the Texas shooting? Could it be that a shoot gun and a .38 revolver was used? Could it be a security guard helped to prevent more killing than the 10 that occurred? Could it be the death toll wasn’t high enough?
 
The one possible problem I see in the speech was his constant use of “The Young People Will Win mantra,” which seems to set the stage for creating a mindset of a us( young people) and they,(older people) scenario.

The school shootings aren’t caused by older people, but young people who have rejected the morality their parents have tried to teach them.

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top