Vatican bank image hurt as JP Morgan closes account [Is the government attacking the Church?]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Galnextdoor
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I almost forgot:
  1. record high gas prices - and Obama’s refusal to do anything to increase the supply of fuel by allowing the construction of pipelines, etc. - instead, spending money on failed “green” energy companies.
Ishii
Yeah, except in Obama’s eyes that’s not a “failure.” He’s actually admitted in the past that he wants energy prices to rise. Of course when people try to ask him about that now (in an election year) he just dodges the question.
 
Yeah, except in Obama’s eyes that’s not a “failure.” He’s actually admitted in the past that he wants energy prices to rise. Of course when people try to ask him about that now (in an election year) he just dodges the question.
And where are the liberals concerned about the plight of the poor in this case? The high gas prices is like a regressive tax on the poor. The poor, working class, working families, working mom’s etc. that the left/liberals are always saying they care about - the high gas prices take money out of their pockets that could be used to buy food and other necessities. And what is Obama’s answer, buy a Prius? Obama cares more about appeasing the environmental lobby that donates heavily to his campaign than he does the working classes.

Ishii
 
He’s actually admitted in the past that he wants energy prices to rise.
As do many investors. They’re not making much with money sitting in the bank getting low-interest rates.

No one’s complaining about the high stock market prices, except those who don’t hold stock.
 
No one’s complaining about the high stock market prices, except those who don’t hold stock.
The poor don’t own stocks but the poor have to drive a car and pay the high gasoline price.
Does the left care? No, they don’t give a blink.
 
Typical opposition rebuttals…how tiering! Goodday everyone!
Peace, Carlan.
 
As do many investors. They’re not making much with money sitting in the bank getting low-interest rates.

No one’s complaining about the high stock market prices, except those who don’t hold stock.
And this refutes what I said how?
 
The poor don’t own stocks but the poor have to drive a car and pay the high gasoline price.
Many who live in the cities don’t own cars. Even those that do take public transportation but eventually their cost of transportation will go up.
 
And this refutes what I said how?
I used it as a basis for my argument. I wasn’t sure if you were being sarcastic or what.

But, be that as it may, we’ve gone way off-topic and I am leaving the thread.
 
Obama bad…Bush Good…Ugh…too funny…I think it is referred to
Obama Derangement Syndrome
 
This is my last post on this thread to bring us back to topic… No, the Vatican is not under attack because of the Vatican Bank issue…I personally want the money going to the church to be 100% transparent as to where it is going, and what is being used for.

As my priest told me, more money goes to the Vatican from the US than the rest of the world combined. I think our church could do with much greater involvement in these financial matters from the people in the pews, and less from the bureaucrats that now control the money in the Vatican. There has been more than one scandal with the Vatican Bank over the years. Coming from the country that gives the most money, I for one support any and all efforts to have financial transparency within the Vatican Bank. I do not see that as an attack at all. It should have to meet the same standard of transparency than any other bank does. After all, if everything is on the up and up, there should be nothing to hide.
 
This is my last post on this thread to bring us back to topic.
Last post? Sorry you couldn’t respond to my points.
Obama bad…Bush Good…Ugh…too funny…I think it is referred to
Obama Derangement Syndrome
Not to be confused with Obama worship - which those on the left seem to do when not blaming Bush for everything.
I think our church could do with much greater involvement in these financial matters from the people in the pews, and less from the bureaucrats that now control the money in the Vatican.
But I thought you liked bureaucrats 🤷 You want them to decide what kind of healthcare coverage we should all have and force us to provide abortificients for free. You want them to decide who wins and loses in the auto industry. I guess what’s good for the goose is not what’s good for the gander after all.
 
This is my last post on this thread to bring us back to topic… No, the Vatican is not under attack because of the Vatican Bank issue…I personally want the money going to the church to be 100% transparent as to where it is going, and what is being used for.

As my priest told me, more money goes to the Vatican from the US than the rest of the world combined. I think our church could do with much greater involvement in these financial matters from the people in the pews, and less from the bureaucrats that now control the money in the Vatican. There has been more than one scandal with the Vatican Bank over the years. Coming from the country that gives the most money, I for one support any and all efforts to have financial transparency within the Vatican Bank. I do not see that as an attack at all. It should have to meet the same standard of transparency than any other bank does. After all, if everything is on the up and up, there should be nothing to hide.
In all honesty…Do you see your contradiction here? Conservatives make the same statement about our government, less bureacrats,transparency…
 
God never prohibited birth control, men within the Church created that rule all on their own.
Not “all on their own.” You’re forgetting the bits about “be fruitful and multiply” (not “contracept and be childless”) and “the two shall become one flesh” (not “the two shall remain two fleshes separated by a thin latex – or chemical – barrier”), for starters.
Jesus was a liberal? He would support the leftist goal of abortion funding for all? Jesus called for us to help the poor - but he didn’t tell us to simply confiscate wealth from the wealthy and give it to the poor so they would become more dependent on wealth redistribution and govt. programs, did he?
Isn’t it ironic? The SNAP/Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of Free Meals and food stamps EVER. (From fns.usda.gov/snap/ – “We put healthy food on the table for more than 46 million people each month.”)

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to “Please Do Not Feed The Animals.” This is because the animals may grow dependent on ‘handouts’ and not learn to take care of themselves.

Thus endeth today’s Lesson.
 
Not “all on their own.” You’re forgetting the bits about “be fruitful and multiply” (not “contracept and be childless”) and “the two shall become one flesh” (not “the two shall remain two fleshes separated by a thin latex – or chemical – barrier”), for starters.

Isn’t it ironic? The SNAP/Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of Free Meals and food stamps EVER. (From fns.usda.gov/snap/ – “We put healthy food on the table for more than 46 million people each month.”)

Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to “Please Do Not Feed The Animals.” This is because the animals may grow dependent on ‘handouts’ and not learn to take care of themselves.

Thus endeth today’s Lesson.
I wish there was a “Like” Button…
 
Isn’t it ironic? The SNAP/Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of Free Meals and food stamps EVER.
Perhaps you should read the passage on the loaves and fishes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top