Vatican delegate: Every indication Medjugorje will be recognized, perhaps later this year

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyc176
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ProdigalSun said:
Are you sure about that? What happens if it is approved? Maybe in degrees or completely. what happens then?
Click to expand...
What happens then? Pigs fly I guess…

I should be careful though if you asked me six years ago that the Church would permit serial adulterers to recieve communion and the pope would say that artificial birth control could be dicerned I’d have said the same thing…
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
What happens then? Pigs fly I guess…

I should be careful though if you asked me six years ago that the Church would permit serial adulterers to recieve communion and the pope would say that artificial birth control could be dicerned I’d have said the same thing…
Click to expand...
So reading between the line… If it is approved then you chalk it up as another heterodox opinion from our heterodox pope! I hope that is not what it says between those lines.

I guess we will just have to wait and see… 🤷
 
ProdigalSun said:
So reading between the line… If it is approved then you chalk it up as another heterodox opinion from our heterodox pope! I hope that is not what it says between those lines.

I guess we will just have to wait and see… 🤷
Click to expand...
That’s the problem with reading between the lines. If approved, I would accept it. But it won’t be.

As for the others…
The ABC issue I chalk up to a “heterodox”. ( not a really good word) opinion of a legitimate pope.

The communion issue is more complicated and will indeed be clarified either by this pope or the next…
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
That’s the problem with reading between the lines. If approved, I would accept it. But it won’t be.

As for the others…
The ABC issue I chalk up to a “heterodox”. ( not a really good word) opinion of a legitimate pope.

The communion issue is more complicated and will indeed be clarified either by this pope or the next…
Click to expand...
So then why bring that up at all. both issues are so far removed from each other that it makes no sense unless you are trying to indicate the illegitimacy of the popes decisions.

It is good to know that you will accept it when approved. I believe it will be to a certain degree. BUt as I keep saying only time will tell.
 
ProdigalSun said:
So then why bring that up at all. both issues are so far removed from each other that it makes no sense unless you are trying to indicate the illegitimacy of the popes decisions.

It is good to know that you will accept it when approved. I believe it will be to a certain degree. BUt as I keep saying only time will tell.
Click to expand...
I brought it up as an example of me being wrong… relax it actually goes to your point.

It won’t. But why do people want it to be so much? To me it borders on cult-like allegiances.

It’s good that you think it’s good I will accept it I guess. But so what if I didn’t?

CAF is in freefall with the changeover. I wonder if this will be a banned topic again?
 
Joe_5859 said:
Crux isn’t “owned” by the Knights of Columbus. Their website says: “We’re an independent Catholic news site, operated in partnership with the Knights of Columbus.”

My understanding is that by “partnership”, it means the Knights support them financially while not exercising editorial control over their content. That’s not their only source of income, though. They also sell advertisements on their site. But that wouldn’t be enough to keep them going.
Click to expand...
As a Knight, I am not thrilled by CRUX since the K of C entered “partnership” with them. Maybe it is because they wanted to hold onto the existing readership, and gradually raise the standard. If so, ok.

The problem with CRUX, and so many others, is they are driven to “find news” preferably shocking or lurid, in a religious sense. Their headlines may say “Man cuts off 8 heads in one hour”, then when you get to paragraph 3, you see it is about a butcher in meat packing plant. 🙂

Their headlines always seem to suggest “WE ARE ON THE BRINK OF SOMETHING CRUCIAL HAPPENING”, but usually it is either some suggestion being floated prematurely, or some old news getting recycled every 6 months. But they are not fake news, so compared to so much media now, they are not too bad.
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
I brought it up as an example of me being wrong… relax it actually goes to your point.

It won’t. But why do people want it to be so much? To me it borders on cult-like allegiances.

It’s good that you think it’s good I will accept it I guess. But so what if I didn’t?

CAF is in freefall with the changeover. I wonder if this will be a banned topic again?
Click to expand...
I’m glad you will accept it when/if it eventually happens. Did you know that the third secret is a visible permanent sign for the world to see. This sign apparently will be in place before the death of the priest who has been given the responsibility reveal it.

If this does not happen than many many people will move away from these apparitions me being one of them. Until then I will be a participant in this because I know what M has done for me and my faith and the miracles I personally witnessed.
 
ProdigalSun said:
I’m glad you will accept it when/if it eventually happens. Did you know that the third secret is a visible permanent sign for the world to see. This sign apparently will be in place before the death of the priest who has been given the responsibility reveal it.

If this does not happen than many many people will move away from these apparitions me being one of them. Until then I will be a participant in this because I know what M has done for me and my faith and the miracles I personally witnessed.
Click to expand...
What in the world are you talking about.

I’ll stick with what pope Francis said. “This is not the Mother of Jesus”

This is an obvious dissention from the Pope.

I expect HH will address this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top