Agreed!I sincerely hope they keep their focus on tangible environmental issues and not the unproven climate change alarmism.
We can actually address the environmental problems, if not distracted by the fabricated war against carbon. Don Quixote tilting at windmills![]()
A problem cannot be solved by applying more thinking which caused the problem in the first place. You cannot really address environmental problems unless you realize that their root cause is the economic system which (a) incentivizes cost savings by dumping pollutants into the environment and (b) must keep growing constantly to sustain itself.We can actually address the environmental problems, if not distracted by the fabricated war against carbon.
Well said.A problem cannot be solved by applying more thinking which caused the problem in the first place. You cannot really address environmental problems unless you realize that their root cause is the economic system which (a) incentivizes cost savings by dumping pollutants into the environment and (b) must keep growing constantly to sustain itself.
What economic system do you think would solve the problem?A problem cannot be solved by applying more thinking which caused the problem in the first place. You cannot really address environmental problems unless you realize that their root cause is the economic system which (a) incentivizes cost savings by dumping pollutants into the environment and (b) must keep growing constantly to sustain itself.
In an article that was highly critical of Archbishop Manuel Fernandez, Magister said that the draft, which the Pope received in March, would have been “demolished” by Cardinal Gerhard Müller and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Yes! A huge part of the planned encyclical will reportedly deal with economics, based on preliminary reports I have seen it will likely contain some of the most strident language ever used in a papal document concerning capitalist exploitation of the environment. This will, I believe, be the genuinely controversial part of the encyclical as opposed to climate change. It will also set out a uniquely Catholic understanding of human ecology" and stress its importance to a renewed environmental movement. I think it will be a very intriguing document no matter what one’s viewpoint and is sure to make headlines around the world as Francis’ first true encyclical.You cannot really address environmental problems unless you realize that their root cause is the economic system which (a) incentivizes cost savings by dumping pollutants into the environment and (b) must keep growing constantly to sustain itself.
Care for the environment is part of faith and morals. Scientific debates on climate change are not but on the basis of sound science moral repercussions naturally emanate which can be explicated and clarified for Catholics, to assist in the mature formation of our consciences.
May the Spirit keep watch over the Church and that which is truly a matter of faith and morals.
I believe there is already enough Catholic thought on the subject to refer to.What economic system do you think would solve the problem?
Well Catholicism supports capitalism and oppossvsocialism and communism .Usury is still condemned by the ChurchI believe there is already enough Catholic thought on the subject to refer to.
Although, the ancient prohibition on usury will probably need to be revisited.
Your points are independent of carbon. They exist whether we use solar, wind, or thorium as our power source.A problem cannot be solved by applying more thinking which caused the problem in the first place. You cannot really address environmental problems unless you realize that their root cause is the economic system which (a) incentivizes cost savings by dumping pollutants into the environment and (b) must keep growing constantly to sustain itself.
Except that the the present economic system is not based on capital, but on debt.Well Catholicism supports capitalism and oppossvsocialism and communism
No, it’s not. Jesus chased moneylenders from the Temple, and today the Pope runs a bank. In the Renaissance, usury has been quietly redefined from charging any interest to charging excessive interest. The Scripture, however, forbids charging any interest. This is because God understands exponential function, and people generally don’tUsury is still condemned by the Church
Of course. That’s why obsessing individually over CO2, NOx, oil spills or whatever misses the forest for the trees.Your points are independent of carbon. They exist whether we use solar, wind, or thorium as our power source.
While there is no disputing that care for the environment is a matter of good stewardship, we are still to use prudential judgment in determining the best *means and way *to accomplish the goal of reducing our environmental impact. We are not beholden to a specific “political” solution.Care for the environment is part of faith and morals. Scientific debates on climate change are not but on the basis of sound science moral repercussions naturally emanate which can be explicated and clarified for Catholics, to assist in the mature formation of our consciences.
Especially in light of Fractional Reserve Banking.Although, the ancient prohibition on usury will probably need to be revisited.
It has been, by simply calling it the cost of doing business.Although, the ancient prohibition on usury will probably need to be revisited.