Vatican publishes reflection on discerning essentials of faith

  • Thread starter Thread starter McCall1981
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

McCall1981

Guest
Here is a link to the document itself: “Sensus Fidei in the Life of the Church”

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_20140610_sensus-fidei_en.html

Vatican publishes reflection on discerning essentials of faith

Cindy Wooden Catholic News Service | Jun. 20, 2014

VATICAN CITY

When a significant portion of the Catholic faithful ignore or reject a church teaching, it is often – but not always – a sign that social and cultural pressures are weakening their faith or that church leaders simply have not found a way to explain the teaching, said members of the International Theological Commission.

The commission published the document " ‘Sensus Fidei’ in the Life of the Church" on the Vatican website in late June with the approval of Cardinal Gerhard Müller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

The theologians, who were appointed to the commission by Pope Benedict XVI, had been asked to explain the meaning, purpose and limits of “sensus fidei” and “sensus fidelium” – the capacity of individual believers and of the church as a whole to discern the truth of faith.

“The sensus fidei fidelis,” they said, “is a sort of spiritual instinct that enables the believer to judge spontaneously whether a particular teaching or practice is or is not in conformity with the Gospel and with apostolic faith. It is intrinsically linked to the virtue of faith itself; it flows from, and is a property of, faith.”

While the validity and importance of different church teachings cannot be the subject of a popular vote, the degree to which they are or are not accepted by most Catholics is important, the commission members wrote.

“When the reception of magisterial teaching by the faithful meets with difficulty and resistance,” the document said, “appropriate action on both sides is required.”

Catholics “must reflect on the teaching that has been given, making every effort to understand and accept it,” the document said. “Resistance, as a matter of principle, to the teaching of the magisterium is incompatible with the authentic sensus fidei.”

At the same time, the theologians said, “the magisterium must likewise reflect on the teaching that has been given and consider whether it needs clarification or reformulation in order to communicate more effectively the essential message.”

Writing about Catholic laypeople, the commission said, “not only do they have the right to be heard, but their reaction to what is proposed as belonging to the faith of the apostles must be taken very seriously, because it is by the church as a whole that the apostolic faith is borne in the power of the Spirit.”

While “the faithful have an instinct for the truth of the Gospel,” the document said, there are situations in which Catholics claim to be relying on that instinct when, in fact, they are promoting deviations from the Christian faith, particularly on moral issues.

The document explains what sensus fidei means, gives biblical evidence for its importance, looks at the history of its development in the church, provides some criteria for discerning when it is authentic and discusses how it is "different from the majority opinion of the faithful in a given time or place."

Particularly drawing on the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, members of the theological commission rejected the idea that Catholic laity are to blindly obey everything the pope and bishops tell them. However, the document emphasized the importance of assuming church leaders are correct, trying to understand the basis for their teaching and, in particular, for praying, regularly receiving the sacraments, studying and being an active member of the Catholic community before claiming to be able to discern that a church teaching needs adjustment.

“It is clear that there can be no simple identification between the sensus fidei and public or majority opinion,” the document said. “These are by no means the same thing.”

“Faith, not opinion, is the necessary focus of attention,” it said. “Opinion is often just an expression, frequently changeable and transient, of the mood or desires of a certain group or culture, whereas faith is the echo of the one Gospel, which is valid for all places and times.”

In addition, members of the commission noted, “in the history of the people of God, it has often been not the majority, but rather a minority which has truly lived and witnessed to the faith.”

The International Theological Commission also said the sensus fidei guarantees Christian freedom and can help purify the faith because it helps individual believers distinguish “between what is essential for an authentic Catholic faith and what, without being formally against the faith, is only accidental or even indifferent with regard to the core of the faith.”

As two examples, the commission members mentioned the possibility that some Catholics may downplay certain forms of Marian piety while still maintaining a devotion to Mary, or “they might also distance themselves from preaching which unduly mixes together Christian faith and partisan political choices.”

The sensus fidei also is essential in helping the church respond to modern problems and challenges because it gives “an intuition as to the right way forward amid the uncertainties and ambiguities of history, and a capacity to listen discerningly to what human culture and the progress of the sciences are saying,” the document said.



ncronline.org/news/theology/vatican-publishes-reflection-discerning-essentials-faith
 
This will probably pass unnoticed, but it may be a very strong indication of things to come.
 
This will probably pass unnoticed, but it may be a very strong indication of things to come.
I agree that its probably a significant indication of things to come, but honestly I have no idea what the “take away” is from this. It seems to say a lot without really saying anything :confused:
 
Just based on a quick read, it sounds ok to me. It sounds like the idea is that Church leadership take tentative steps to more actively officially promote understanding and faithfulness to Church teachings. All the while being very diplomatic and open. 😉 Did I miss any red flags?
 
In what sense; what do you mean?
It sets a groundwork for the notion that the opinions of deeply faithful Catholics are evidence for the Truth. This might come into play practically: for example, these opinions often run counter to the Church on the question of whether Protestant marriages should always be presumed to be valid.
 
It sets a groundwork for the notion that the opinions of deeply faithful Catholics are evidence for the Truth. This might come into play practically: for example, these opinions often run counter to the Church on the question of whether Protestant marriages should always be presumed to be valid.
So some deeply faithful Catholics think they should not be? (wondering for real here)
 
So some deeply faithful Catholics think they should not be? (wondering for real here)
Yeah. I consider myself deeply faithful, and I think – since many Protestants enter marriage a contract, not a covenant, and a dissoluble contract – such marriages should never be presumed to be valid, for canonical purposes (usually having to do with second marriages).
 
I’m going to try to muddle through this document, but before I even got off the first paragraph one thing hit me. Sr. Sara Butler with a Phd in theology has pushed for female ordination according to this link. (Link works for me despite the icon.)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dombalia
 
When time permits, I will try to muddle through the actual document but after a brief scan, I already see a red flag of concern for me. According to the ITC, they acknowledge Yves Congar’s contribution to* sensus fidelium* (see #43.) I was under the impression that some of his theology was rejected by the Church (back in the 40’s or 50’s?) and there was much controversy on his teaching of the collegiality of the bishops and the authority of the Church because it tried to negate certain aspects of V (1) teaching.

To which catechism do we go now? But never mind. My sensus fidei tells me who is faithful and who is not. I’ll listen to them after they figure it all out.
 
I agree that its probably a significant indication of things to come, but honestly I have no idea what the “take away” is from this. It seems to say a lot without really saying anything :confused:
I understand what you are saying and am also a bit confused…we must faithfully pray for the Church and ALL those in any position of leadership as we are living in difficult days.
Blessings to you,
mlz
 
When time permits, I will try to muddle through the actual document but after a brief scan, I already see a red flag of concern for me. According to the ITC, they acknowledge Yves Congar’s contribution to* sensus fidelium* (see #43.) I was under the impression that some of his theology was rejected by the Church (back in the 40’s or 50’s?) and there was much controversy on his teaching of the collegiality of the bishops and the authority of the Church because it tried to negate certain aspects of V (1) teaching.

To which catechism do we go now? But never mind. My sensus fidei tells me who is faithful and who is not. I’ll listen to them after they figure it all out.
Congar was made a Cardinal by St. John Paul II in 1994.
 
Be encouraged everyone!
Sensible light shows things to our senses. The intellectual light is to manifest the truth which is contained in thoughts. But those who receive the spiritual or supernatural Light, perceive what is beyond all intellect. They participate in the divine energies and become themselves, in a sort, Light. When they unite to the Light they see with it in full all that is hidden from those who have not seen the grace of Light. The Uncreated Light is the Light where God makes Himself manifest to those who enter into union with Him.

St. Gregory Palamas (1296 / 1359)
 
Yes, I know. So does that mean that the controversy was resolved?
I’ve hardly read Congar myself, so I can’t tell you from what I know personally. But I would assume so if St. JPII made him a Cardinal. I mean, consider that both Pope St. John XXIII and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI were suspected of modernism before Vatican II.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top