Vatican sources deny that Pope is upset over cardinals' marriage book [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i..._CNA_Catholic_news_marriage_3_8_13.jpgVatican City, Sep 19, 2014 / 05:01 pm (CNA).-Vatican City, Sep 19, 2014 / 05:01 pm (CNA).- Catholic Church sources have dismissed rumors that Pope Francis is annoyed by an Ignatius Press book critical of Cardinal Walter Kasper’s position on Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried.

The French Catholic newspaper La Croix said Sept. 17 that “a senior source close to the Argentine Pope” claimed that Pope Francis would be “annoyed by the publication of this collective work.”

However, sources close to the Pope denied this claim, telling CNA that the Pope is not even aware of the book.

The book, from Ignatius Press, is titled “Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church.” It is a collection of essays on the pastoral approach to Catholics who have divorced and civilly remarried. Authors of the essays include five cardinals as well as other scholars.

Contributors include Cardinal Gerhard Muller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; Cardinal Raymond Burke, prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura; Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, president emeritus of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences; Cardinal Carlo Caffarra of Bologna, one of the closest theologians to St. John Paul II in questions of morality and the family; and Cardinal Velasio De Paolis, president emeritus of the Prefecture for Economic Affairs of the Holy See.

The book is set to be published next month, around the time that the Synod of Bishops will be meeting in Rome to discuss issues involving the family.

The Ignatius Press book’s introduction says the essays in “Remaining in the Truth of Christ” are responses to Cardinal Walter Kasper’s 2014 book “The Gospel of the Family,” which includes his advocacy of giving Holy Communion to some Catholics who have divorced and civilly remarried without an annulment.

Fr. Joseph Fessio, S.J., founder and editor of Ignatius Press, responded sharply to claims by Cardinal Kasper in an email exchange with CNA. He drew from Cardinal Kasper’s Sept. 18 interview with Italian newspaper La Stampa, responding point-by-point to the cardinal’s statements.

In the interview, Cardinal Kasper complained of learning about the book from journalists who had received advance copies of it. The cardinal said that he had not received an advance copy, adding, “In my entire academic life nothing like this has ever happened to me.”

“You chose to leave academia to enter public life. Get used to it,” Fr. Fessio responded.

The priest also referenced Cardinal Kasper’s statement, “If cardinals who are the closest collaborators of the pope intervene in this organized and public manner, at least in regard to the most recent history of the Church we are facing an unprecedented situation.”

“Well, you did something unprecedented,” Fr. Fession replied. “And it was organized and public. Well, it was supposed to be done in secrecy, but then you published your consistory intervention as a book.”

Furthermore, Fr. Fessio responded to Cardinal Kasper’s statement that his consistory remarks had not offered “a definitive solution” but rather “posed some questions and offered considerations for possible responses.”

“Well, what are you complaining about then?” Fr. Fessio asked. “You got some answers and some responses to your considerations. Or weren’t those the answers you were expecting?”

Controversy over the subject arose when Cardinal Kasper delivered a prominent two-hour address to the February 2014 cardinals’ consistory, which focused on the topic of the family. He has advocated his positon in other interviews and speeches as well.

During the consistory speech, Cardinal Kasper asked “is it not perhaps an exploitation of the person” when a person who has been divorced and remarried is excluded from receiving Communion. He suggested that for “the smaller segment of the divorced and remarried,” perhaps they could be admitted to “the sacrament of penance, and then of Communion.”

In an interview with Italian newspaper Il Mattino published Sept. 18, Cardinal Kasper charged that some bishops in the upcoming synod “want a doctrinal war.”

Catholic doctrine is “not a closed system” but “a living tradition that develops,” he said, adding that he is not “the target of the controversy,” but rather that the Pope “probably is.”

The contributors to the Ignatius Press book write that the Bible and the Church Fathers do not support the practice advocated by Cardinal Kasper. The authors say that there is no contradiction between “genuine mercy and compassion” and Catholic doctrine and pastoral practice. Catholic teaching is “based on the teaching of Jesus himself,” they say, according to the Ignatius Press summary of the book.

The contributors also consider the Eastern Orthodox approach to divorce and remarriage and Catholic resistance to it. They find “serious theological and pastoral difficulties” in the practice.

Coverage of the rumors surrounding the Ignatius Press book has been prominent among those who speculate or assume that Pope Francis intends to side with Cardinal Kasper’s position at the bishops’ synod.

Pope Francis himself has reaffirmed the indissolubility and lifelong nature of Christian marriage, such as his April 2014 remarks to the bishops of South Africa.

feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/catholicnewsagency/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~4/7o-2kTTw4LU

Full article…
 
Fr. Fession sounds a little snarky. “Get used to it”? What he did was very discourteous and not at all appropriately fraternal.
 
Fr. Fession sounds a little snarky. “Get used to it”? What he did was very discourteous and not at all appropriately fraternal.
I think Fr. Fessio (Fession is a typeo) believes that Cardinal Kasper is being extremely facetious. A lot of people believe that Cardinal Kasper’s proposals are extremely and urgently bad, his intentions (whatever they are) completely beside the point. A lot of people think the teaching against Communion for divorced and remarried people without an annulment is so strikingly crystal clear–as clear as a city-sized fireball down from heaven on a clear day on a bucolic hillside–that it is brain-crushingly difficult to consider that an opposite opinion could be valid, after all due consideration of course.
 
Fr. Fession sounds a little snarky. “Get used to it”? What he did was very discourteous and not at all appropriately fraternal.
I’m glad he said it. I am far more scandalized by what Cardinal Kaspar said about how some of the Bishops want a doctrinal war against the Pope.
 
I think Fr. Fessio (Fession is a typeo) believes that Cardinal Kasper is being extremely facetious. A lot of people believe that Cardinal Kasper’s proposals are extremely and urgently bad, his intentions (whatever they are) completely beside the point. A lot of people think the teaching against Communion for divorced and remarried people without an annulment is so strikingly crystal clear–as clear as a city-sized fireball down from heaven on a clear day on a bucolic hillside–that it is brain-crushingly difficult to consider that an opposite opinion could be valid, after all due consideration of course.
👍

Love it…you should be published!
 
Fr. Fessio is merely pointing out that these other Cardinals are doing nothing more or less than what Cardinal Kasper was doing: publicly stating their theological arguments on a matter of interest to the public. If that’s a bad thing for a cardinal to do, then why did Kasper do it first? If it’s a good thing then why’s he complaining about it?

Cardinal Kasper appears very arrogant in this matter in two ways:
  1. He appears to think that he alone among the cardinals should enjoy the privilege of publishing a theological opinion on the matter.
  2. He appears to be arrogating to himself the authority of the pope without the pope actually publicly authorizing him to speak on his behalf. He’s functionally saying “Criticism of me is criticism of the pope.” Uh, no Cardinal. Until and unless he says otherwise publicly, these are YOUR ideas that are being criticized.
The whole thing is very reminiscent of the lead-up to Humanae Vitae when all sorts of prelates and insiders thought they could pressure Paul VI into doing their bidding.
 
I’m glad he said it. I am far more scandalized by what Cardinal Kaspar said about how some of the Bishops want a doctrinal war against the Pope.
Agreed, just catching up on my Catholic news. In related news (?), is Cardinal Burke going to the Synod?
 
Agreed, just catching up on my Catholic news. In related news (?), is Cardinal Burke going to the Synod?
When they released the list of attendees a little while back, he was automatically on the list because of his role in the Curia. Since that time, he has supposedly been removed from his position (although this has still not been officially announced).

Since then there has been no announcement either way, so as it stands now, he is still on the attending list.
 
Fr. Fessio is merely pointing out that these other Cardinals are doing nothing more or less than what Cardinal Kasper was doing: publicly stating their theological arguments on a matter of interest to the public. If that’s a bad thing for a cardinal to do, then why did Kasper do it first? If it’s a good thing then why’s he complaining about it?
The thing he is complaining about is being ambushed. In the academic world of publishing–especially among colleagues–if you’re going launch a war of words against a published author, the respectable and respectful (and expected) thing to do is inform them beforehand, not let them find out from the media. If you read the article, you will see that is clearly what he is disappointed about–that Ignatius Press would pull such a petty, rookie stunt on the international stage, failing to give him due courtesy and releasing advanced copies of a book to the press, who want comments from Cardinal Kasper, who can’t respond because he hasn’t seen the book.

“Get used to it,” sounds a lot like, “We’re petty and frightened so we’ll do what we want.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top