R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
She doesn’t wear a veil, consecrated female religious veil.
Laity wear head coverings.
Laity wear head coverings.
Not sure what I’m not reading. He’s looking for uniformity in the choir and in liturgical ministries. It’s an easy choice—wear your head covering and sit in the pew or don’t—and lead the choir.One of the things he said was that he wanted he not to veil when she was leading the choir. His reason for this was uniformity. There is only one other woman in the choir who veils of the 7 or 8 regular women members. He also spoke to the 2 women EMHC’s who veil saying the same thing.
Although it formally ceased as a requirement by 1976.Again, this is something that until 1983 was actually required in the Code of Canon Law (whether practiced or not)
This is his own opinion, as the color of one’s head covering makes no difference.He also reminded married women they should not wear white veils as it meant they were available.
I’m a moderate liberal, who would never in a million years cover my head in church unless required of all women. I find the practice hideous and disgusting. Still, I have to admit, what’s good for me isn’t good for everyone. Just as I support my own decision to never cover my head, I respect another woman’s right to do so, and I don’t judge them.Perhaps the priest’s mind will be changed should she decide not to do it if she can’t veil. I really can’t say what the OP’s wife should do but I’m upset a priest would put her in such a position, and even more so about what the liberals on here who would never veil in a million years have to say about it.
I think the semantics is partly why I hate the practice so much. If they’d call it a head covering, like it is, I might not hate it so much. One of my failings, but we all have our foibles. I never interfere with women who cover their head or treat them with anything but respect.She doesn’t wear a veil, consecrated female religious veil.
Why? I would never wear one of those things and don’t care what anyone thinks.I shudder to think what might go through a veiled woman’s mind when she sees women who don’t veil.
It’s the same in the Muslim world. Much emotion for a piece of cloth.So much Emotion for a piece of cloth.
It is a self-imposed one though, not one the the Church requires.a veil represents a moral duty.
The 1917 Code has been abrogated and replaced by the 1983 code. It is no longer required. Wearing a head covering today represents a personal choice not a Church duty unless you are consecrated religious and it is required of you by your order or congregation.Again, this is something that until 1983 was actually required in the Code of Canon Law (whether practiced or not) when it became optional to the individual.
Not only is that inaccurate, but it seems to contradict the argument I commonly hear for veils, which is that it is a sign of humility and modesty. Wearing a veil which signifies your “availability” turns the veil from humble devotion to personal advertisement.He also reminded married women they should not wear white veils as it meant they were available.
First, I know they may be very humble and devoted. I am not judging them, but I can’t help too much how I feel. I can only try to temper those feelings with reason.Okay I’m curious. Why do you think women covering their heads is hideous and disgusting???