WARNING: The Most Holy Family Monastery

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xenon-135
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This line from their web page tells me everything I need to know about this group.

*“It is no exaggeration to state that Mother Theresa of Calcutta was one of the greatest apostates in history.” *

These guys are way out there.
The purpose of the Catholic Church, I hope we all agree, is salvation of the soul. John 3:5 says all must be baptized with water in order to be saved. When you read the lives of the saints, many of them baptized thousands of souls at the risk of their lives. Some of these stories are on the MHFM web site. Nowhere in Mother Teresa’s life stories have I been able to find where she even as much as offered to baptize one of these dying souls. In fact, a famous quote of Mother Teresa’s is that she would want them to be "a better Muslim, a better Buddhist, etc. Christ called all to be Catholic Christian in one Church. All other churches reject Christ because they do not accept ALL He has taught. Nowhere in Scripture does Christ command that we accept some of what he has taught, or most of what he has taught. His command is that we accept ALL that he has taught, and, since God is Almighty, certainly he has instilled in each of us the way and the means to find the truth. I think we call that a conscience.
It seems to me that Mother Teresa was not a missionary for the Catholic Faith, but only a social justice advocate, which counts for nothing when it is the eternal salvation of the soul that matters.
 
yes i do… what’s your point? do you wear an upside cross around your neck? try that out and see what happens…
I agree. Since when has a St. Peter’s cross ever been established as a symbol of the papacy? Or would you hang an upside down cross in hour home? You can look it up, but the fact remains that the upside down cross is most certainly a well-used Satanic symbol. Nevertheless, it’s not the upside down cross that is of concern here but the upside down theology of the conciliar popes. For starters, I would suggest that you look up the recent Vatican document that approves the NeoCatechumenal Way, then look up NeoCatechumenal Way and see the complete distortion of Catholicism this Vatican-approved organization is. This is what convinced me to look further into the antics of these popes and what I discovered is appalling.
 
There is a thread with better answers here. You are free to join that discussion if you would like as this is not a banned topic.
God bless.
MF
Maybe I’m blind, but all I see here is criticism of Most Holy Family Monastery but nothing to back it up. I’ve been to the site myself and I can’t find anything that is not well-documented. Whenever I find fault with someone, I hear his entire case first before passing judgment. I don’t think anyone here has ever actuin this forum has given a single solid argument that would place MHFM in the category of nut cases. Name-calling usually signifies an unwillingness to take a good look at the facts. Their book, “The Truth about What Really Happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II” is an eye-opener. It contains numerous ex cathedra quotes from past popes, saints and from present popes from L’Osservatore Romano that are completely opposite of Traditional Catholic beliefs. Much of what is in this book is also on the MHFM web site.
OM
 
I recently viewed a video tape that was focused on creationism and provided supporing evidence of it against evolution.

The video was produced by The Most Holy Family Monastery in New York state.

When I visited their website, I was shocked!!!

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com

We truly need to formulate an attack, and address an apologia against this organizaion.

I wonder how many more nuts like these are out there floating about!

GGGRRRRR!!
I sould love to see the apologia. I suggest you buy their book about what happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II and give a point by point analysis of why they are wrong. Be fair, please.
When my bishop tells me at a catechetical workshop that we are going to experience the real presence of Christ “in each other” and a priest laughs at the “old” concept that we must be “soldiers of Christ” and when a new Mass is concocted that changes the words of consecration, Jesus very own words, from many to all, and strips it of most of its prayers, so badly needed in these terrible times and when my pastor quotes John Paul II and says we are all saved, etc etc etc (RENEW, NeoCatechumenal Way, etc. look them up, they’re heresy) it’s time to exit this Church and realize that I must return to Christ’s pure Church which can never be tainted with such garbage.
They have taken over the buildings in the Vatican but they have not taken over the established Church which was built on the true popes and continues to exist through the few who have not been fooled by the Vatican II false church. We Traditional Catholics continue to fast from meat on Fridays; we profess and defend our true Catholic Faith and obey the Commandments of God and His Church. We reject all that opposes His true Church.
Think about it. If the new church theology is true, then the Holy Spirit has been wrong for the past 2000 years.
Christ remains with His true Church and that is where we must be in what are probably the last few days.
OM
 
Maybe I’m blind, but all I see here is criticism of Most Holy Family Monastery but nothing to back it up.
If one decides that they are Jesus Christ, the Pope or Napolean, it would be foolish to support them financially by buying their materials and giving their ideas credibility. The burden of proof for such outrageous claims is great indeed. I did find it interesting that one of their doduments in on “no salavation outside the church.” This is the very situation they are in, unless one allows the Church to be redefined subjectively as one’s own group.

If the Church is in fact false and has been for the last 50 years, and if this one man (or others like him) have in fact been the ones who are “really” the Church, then the Holy Spirit has truly let the gates of Hell prevail. The primacy of Peter and apostolic succession have become meaningless.

I am not going to rehash all the reasons, both psychological and theological that sedevacantism is absurd. That has been done to death here and those threads can be searched out. I will say that when you claim that you and your fellow traditionalist will “reject all that opposes His true church” that you are wrong. If you were to join the traditionalist threads and get to know “most traditionalist” you would find them loyal to the Church and loving of their non-tradionalist brothers. It is you who are the exeption, even amoung traditionalists. Don’t believe me? Start a poll and see how far you get.
 
yes i do… what’s your point? do you wear an upside cross around your neck? try that out and see what happens…
Well then, If sacred Tradition says that he was crucified upside-down, then why are you hyper critical of a single case of artistic expression. Has the pope done anything to indicate that he is some kind of satanist? No, he has not.

What I wear around my neck (a Miraculous Medal) is not an issue.
 

Here is a picture of young people at World Youth Day in Germany (Aug. 2005). They are basically worshipping Benedict XVI, just as the people at a Rock concert worship a Rock Star. This picture captures the reality of the non-Catholic counterfeit Vatican II sect: it captures what “the Papacy” has become in the Vatican II sect. The people don’t have a clue about what true fidelity to the Papacy is, but rather they follow (and worship as a Christ) the man who they think has been elected pope - no matter if he preaches a new Gospel or renders Jesus Christ meaningless, as Benedict XVI does. No matter that Benedict XVI just attended the synagogue a few days before demonstrating that Christ is meaningless (according to him)… no matter, they worship him all the same. They don’t have any clue about what true fidelity to the Papacy is – how it is fidelity to its unchangeable dogmas – nor any clue that the pope and the Papacy are there to faithfully transmit what Jesus Christ and the Apostles gave to the Church in the deposit of unchangeable Faith. It’s all about man, and the man they think (quite wrongly) is the pope, whom they treat as if he is Christ Himself.
Now… look at this.

Does the commentary below it make sense?

Is what we see there an act of worship as the site alleges? :dts:

Has either John Paul II or Benedict XVI preached anything that would qualify as the “new gospel” that they allege? There’s no documentation of that. I’ve read some of the latest Papal encyclicals, (my favorite being Ecclesia de Eucharistia of John Paul II) and I can say that not only is there no problem with it but that it is a great work for explaining and defending the Eucharist.

Has Dimond offered anything that will support his allegation that either of the last two popes were not validly elected? No, he does not. He offers nothing more than rhetoric without substantiation…which is my personal; definition of propaganda.

That site is laden with similar documents.
 
If one decides that they are Jesus Christ, the Pope or Napolean, it would be foolish to support them financially by buying their materials and giving their ideas credibility. The burden of proof for such outrageous claims is great indeed. I did find it interesting that one of their doduments in on “no salavation outside the church.” This is the very situation they are in, unless one allows the Church to be redefined subjectively as one’s own group.

If the Church is in fact false and has been for the last 50 years, and if this one man (or others like him) have in fact been the ones who are “really” the Church, then the Holy Spirit has truly let the gates of Hell prevail. The primacy of Peter and apostolic succession have become meaningless.

I am not going to rehash all the reasons, both psychological and theological that sedevacantism is absurd. That has been done to death here and those threads can be searched out. I will say that when you claim that you and your fellow traditionalist will “reject all that opposes His true church” that you are wrong. If you were to join the traditionalist threads and get to know “most traditionalist” you would find them loyal to the Church and loving of their non-tradionalist brothers. It is you who are the exeption, even amoung traditionalists. Don’t believe me? Start a poll and see how far you get.
Where, exactly, do you see anyone claiming to be Jesus Christ, Napoleon, etc.? All that MHFM does, basically, is quote past popes and the Traditional Magisterium to back up their claims. Obviously you have not read their web site, but passed judgment before taking a good look at what they have to say.

No Salvation Outside the Church… I have that book. It is filled with ex cathedra (infallible) quotes from popes and Church Councils, all of whom agree with Christ who established a Church and insisted that we believe ALL that He has taught if we hope to be saved.

Where in Scripture do you read anything to infer that Christ ever said, that as long as you believe MOST of what I have taught, you will be saved. All nonCatholic religions are a rejection of Christ and those who reject Christ, including those who believe and practice the new theology of the Vatican II Church and its popes will not be saved. It makes no sense to believe otherwise.

If God is Almighty then God has placed a yearning for the whole truth within all of us. If God is not Almighty then he has allowed some to remain ignorant. Christ tells us every hair on our heads is numbered. Does this sound as if he has forgotten some of us?

These men do not claim to be the true church; they simply claim that the true Church for the past 50 years has not been in Rome, but elsewhere in those who continue to believe and practice true Catholic Tradition. Take a good look at the Vatican II theology and what it’s popes teach and you have to be blind not to see the contrast. They preact true Catholic theology but cancel it out with ambiguous statements mixed with truth. There is no place for ambiguity in truth. New CCC 1860: “…The promptings and feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders.” In other words, if someone prsssures you into an immoral act or you are too weak to resist, then you have not committed a mortal sin. If this is the case, then why bother with any of the Commandments or even the new CCC at all? Claim you are weak and be guilt free. Christ says the opposite. He holds us liable for all of our sins and tells us we are weak but he is strong and that we can do all things through him who strengthens us. Unless we call on him in our weakness we will be lost. But that’s not what your Novus Ordo church teaches at all.

The Holy Spirit has not abandoned his Church. Either you believe that Christ has allowed a terribly tainted church that needs repair from countless heresies, or you believe that Christ’s true Church remains pure and perfect as it has been built as he promised and not one error has been able to infiltrate into her truths and compromise anything. That Church exists in her faithful and in her written Tradition and Scripture, in what you call “old”. You can’t erase what has been built by Christ and HIs Holy Spirit.

Your Novus Ordo “Love” means compromise and kowtowing to the will of the majority. If you recall, There was no crowd beneath the Cross on Calvary.
True love consists in taking your licks from those who refuse to hear your case and praying for their souls anyway. The only true love in this world is concern for the eternal salvation of souls at whatever cost is required. Truth in His Traditional Scripture and Divine Revelation through Popes, Councils and Fathers and Doctors of the true Chruch decides what God wants from us, not meaningless polls.
 
Where, exactly, do you see anyone claiming to be Jesus Christ, Napoleon, etc.? All that MHFM does, basically, is quote past popes and the Traditional Magisterium to back up their claims. Obviously you have not read their web site, but passed judgment before taking a good look at what they have to say.

No Salvation Outside the Church… I have that book. It is filled with ex cathedra (infallible) quotes from popes and Church Councils, all of whom agree with Christ who established a Church and insisted that we believe ALL that He has taught if we hope to be saved.

Where in Scripture do you read anything to infer that Christ ever said, that as long as you believe MOST of what I have taught, you will be saved. All nonCatholic religions are a rejection of Christ and those who reject Christ, including those who believe and practice the new theology of the Vatican II Church and its popes will not be saved. It makes no sense to believe otherwise.

If God is Almighty then God has placed a yearning for the whole truth within all of us. If God is not Almighty then he has allowed some to remain ignorant. Christ tells us every hair on our heads is numbered. Does this sound as if he has forgotten some of us?

These men do not claim to be the true church; they simply claim that the true Church for the past 50 years has not been in Rome, but elsewhere in those who continue to believe and practice true Catholic Tradition. Take a good look at the Vatican II theology and what it’s popes teach and you have to be blind not to see the contrast. They preact true Catholic theology but cancel it out with ambiguous statements mixed with truth. There is no place for ambiguity in truth. New CCC 1860: “…The promptings and feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders.” In other words, if someone prsssures you into an immoral act or you are too weak to resist, then you have not committed a mortal sin. If this is the case, then why bother with any of the Commandments or even the new CCC at all? Claim you are weak and be guilt free. Christ says the opposite. He holds us liable for all of our sins and tells us we are weak but he is strong and that we can do all things through him who strengthens us. Unless we call on him in our weakness we will be lost. But that’s not what your Novus Ordo church teaches at all.

The Holy Spirit has not abandoned his Church. Either you believe that Christ has allowed a terribly tainted church that needs repair from countless heresies, or you believe that Christ’s true Church remains pure and perfect as it has been built as he promised and not one error has been able to infiltrate into her truths and compromise anything. That Church exists in her faithful and in her written Tradition and Scripture, in what you call “old”. You can’t erase what has been built by Christ and HIs Holy Spirit.

Your Novus Ordo “Love” means compromise and kowtowing to the will of the majority. If you recall, There was no crowd beneath the Cross on Calvary.
True love consists in taking your licks from those who refuse to hear your case and praying for their souls anyway. The only true love in this world is concern for the eternal salvation of souls at whatever cost is required. Truth in His Traditional Scripture and Divine Revelation through Popes, Councils and Fathers and Doctors of the true Chruch decides what God wants from us, not meaningless polls.
That’s baloney…

These guys have offered nothing but propaganda without substance.

…and you are wrong that they are not asserting that they are the true church. What do you think their entire implied premise is?

You give them too much trust and slack.
 
These men do not claim to be the true church; they simply claim that the true Church for the past 50 years has not been in Rome, but elsewhere in those who continue to believe and practice true Catholic Tradition.
This is precisely my point.The fact is that they ARE purporting themselves to be the true church.
 
No Salvation Outside the Church… I have that book. It is filled with ex cathedra (infallible) quotes from popes and Church Councils, all of whom agree with Christ who established a Church and insisted that we believe ALL that He has taught if we hope to be saved.
And that church is where? Has it disappeared? Is it a secret know only to the enlightened? These people have rejected all authority and made themselves their own interpreters of Church teaching and documents. They have, in practice, become each a pope unto themselves. A few have even taken the title.

I at least, am a real person. You come here and immediately start advocating that the Catholic Church isn’t really the Catholic Church, but rather a sect that exist of a handful of people each drawing the line of when the Church went apostate. Did you know that not all sedevacantist even agree on who the last “real” pope was? As far as we know, you may be a lone Church of one and the owner of this website.

I would encourage everyone to please understand that these people amount to an almost non-existant percentage of Catholics. Any one can co-opt the name “Catholic” for their own purposes, but this sect is no more Catholic than the Westboro Baptists (of “God Hates Fags” notoriety) are Baptist. If you wish to study their ideas, then you can search CAF and the CA main site for more detailed response to their tired rhetoric.
 
And that church is where? Has it disappeared? Is it a secret know only to the enlightened? These people have rejected all authority and made themselves their own interpreters of Church teaching and documents. They have, in practice, become each a pope unto themselves. A few have even taken the title.

I at least, am a real person. You come here and immediately start advocating that the Catholic Church isn’t really the Catholic Church, but rather a sect that exist of a handful of people each drawing the line of when the Church went apostate. Did you know that not all sedevacantist even agree on who the last “real” pope was? As far as we know, you may be a lone Church of one and the owner of this website.

I would encourage everyone to please understand that these people amount to an almost non-existant percentage of Catholics. Any one can co-opt the name “Catholic” for their own purposes, but this sect is no more Catholic than the Westboro Baptists (of “God Hates Fags” notoriety) are Baptist. If you wish to study their ideas, then you can search CAF and the CA main site for more detailed response to their tired rhetoric.
If all you have is name-calling and bad statistics to back up your case, it’s useless to continue. I have asked you to read their web site. I have read it all and I know what I’m talking about. You, obviously have not read much of it because you seem to be afraid of the truth. Your best defense is to throw falsehoods. Everything you say here is false and you provide nothing to back it up except empty accusations.
Truth has never been a matter of numbers. I offer you the truth; you reject it. I tried. Good luck and God bless.
 
If you read what they have to say, you would have to think otherwise.
I have read their website…it’s wrong.

They promote sedevacantism and if you are promoting them then you are too. Is that your intent?
 
I recently viewed a video tape that was focused on creationism and provided supporing evidence of it against evolution.

The video was produced by The Most Holy Family Monastery in New York state.

When I visited their website, I was shocked!!!

www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com

We truly need to formulate an attack, and address an apologia against this organizaion.

I wonder how many more nuts like these are out there floating about!

GGGRRRRR!!
As far as I can tell, the “charism” of their order seems to be bashing the Post Vatican II Church. That is not a true charism, and is hardly a true mission. They will grow old, becoming bitter old people who do nothing but gripe- instead of striving to be the models of holiness, humility, reverence, and piety that truly living the Christian life requires of them.
 
To “churchmilitant” ~ so that is what they’re calling it these days, ~ “artistic expression?” Might as well have put a goat’s head or five pointed star on that chair…

There is no way a devout (being the operative word) Catholic, in this day and age, wear an upside down cross, that the entire world recognizes as a Satanic symbol and call it devotion to Saint Peter…

like i said, wear an upside down crucifix and see the reactions you get from people who walk by you ~ teenagers would probably label you a warlock… good luck with that…
 
To “churchmilitant” ~ so that is what they’re calling it these days, ~ “artistic expression?” Might as well have put a goat’s head or five pointed star on that chair…

There is no way a devout (being the operative word) Catholic, in this day and age, wear an upside down cross, that the entire world recognizes as a Satanic symbol and call it devotion to Saint Peter…

like i said, wear an upside down crucifix and see the reactions you get from people who walk by you ~ teenagers would probably label you a warlock… good luck with that…
Don’t be silly…the only people who believe that foolishness are people who watch too many satanic themed horror shows.

It is a simple piece of art and nothing more. Only someone with rocks in their head would allege that John Paul the Great, (of blessed memory!) had anything to do with satanism. These men…and that’s all they are…they are not prophets…they are not bishops, they are nothing more than members of a cult, have created their own anti-Catholic crusade. (Yes I did just accuse them of anti-Catholicism because they tear down the body of Christ with disobedience to the hierarchy of the Church while purporting themselves to be faithful Catholics. Their propaganda is full of lies and allegations that any rational person will see for what they are.

Just for instance, their article on “the heresies of Benedict XVI” is a screaming load of propagandized junk. They assert that he did not reveal the real third secret of Fatima to the world and yet no one seems to question how they would even know since the secret is just that…a secret.

The entire PDF document is a load of garbage to make themselves appear to be “whistle blowers” when in fact they are blatantly misconstruing what documents like the book on the Church and the Jews. In reading their quote, I do not see anything that says what they allege it to mean , because I read what is actually there and not what they want me to see. This is the very same kind of trash that anti-Catholics produce to bash our most holy faith, and it is shameful (IMO) for them to produce it to begin with and for any faithful Catholic with an active brain cell and an honest heart to accept as fact.

Just as I say of every a-C site that alleges such as this, prove it.

Lemme ask you this… Do you agree with them that the seat of Peter has been vacant for all the years that they allege?
 
What is even more interesting to me, is the lack of response to the specific charges from the site. I would think that someone would have something to say about them, but all I read are attacks on the people just pointing out facts. No one seems to have a problem shooting the messenger, and no problem ignoring the facts which need looked at and dealt with. Very interesting indeed. Will I get attacked now for pointing this out?
 
Try not to get the martyr hat on too tight there, okay?
  1. According to your profile you are not even a Catholic, so you essentially know less than nothing about this cult nor even about the Catholic faith.
  2. The allegations that they make are specious and fictitious. You’ll notice that they make no effort to substantiate them with facts therefore there is no reason to refute them when any honest person will recognize them for what they are. Fictions expressed as conspiracy theories without any substance.
  3. They offer no evidence at all for their most damning claim that any of the popes they oppose are in fact any of the things that they allege. Do you see the least source reference that can be verified?
  4. In debate…the burden of proof lies upon the person making the allegation, so until they can offer real substantive proof of their allegations, they have done nothing but make scandalous remarks that no honest person will take seriously.
You may consider this an attack if it makes you feel good about yourself, but that certainly isn’t the way it was intended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top