Yes. The title of the thread is “Was HVIII a Catholic or Protestant.” Well, I think the answer is he started out a Catholic but became a Protestant, even though he himself would have denied the definition.
An interesting side note to all this is the fact that before Henry had his fateful accident that nearly cost him his life he was quite agreeable and kindly. Afterwards, he became mean and capricious. If he hadn’t had that injury perhaps history would have been very different. We can only guess, but I truly believe it changed him into the monstrous tyrant of history.
Having the Bible but rejecting the religion that produced it is like taking the writings of the Dalai Lama and following his writings but rejecting him and the Tibetan Buddhism sounds silly doesn’t
it, why do it. If the writings are a refection of the religion but you reject the religion from which they came, you are left only with a reflection.
And another problem was also that when Henry had the accident Catherine of Aragon was expecting, and when she got told her husband (Henry) had a near fatal accident and it was touch and go whether he would live, she had a miscarriage which by the way was a boy, so if everyone had stayed “Stum” Henry would have had his son. Henry in the end was like the fallen Angel who said “I will not obey” and did his own thing and broke from Rome and did his own thing and made his Church the way he saw it (such arrogance) it. But the joke was his Mistress now his Wife had a girl, I think the Lord had the last laugh, and at the end of his six wives he never had a son to take the throne and the only one he had with his third wife, Jane Seymour, the child died not long after Henry died, he thrashed England and made up a new Religion for Lust, and in the end even the second wife produced a daughter (Elizabeth 1) the heretic Queen. That ended the Tudor Line.
When Henry’s eldest brother died - Arthur- Catherine of Aragon was going to go back to Spain
when the leech Henry took a liking to her, now it was perfectly Ok to marry her as Catherine and Henry were only engaged at that at a distance no planes in those days, they were perfectly within there rights to marry, I mean how many people break off there engagement and marry another, and why not. It was a marriage of convenience between two Countries Spain/England and they were engaged since they were babies, Henry did not have to marry his future sister in law, but he fancied her and since his brother had died before they “knew each other” they could marry.
It was Henry who should not have married his Mistress Anne Boleyn because he had been with her sister and she had a child for Henry but leech Henry married the mistress Anne Boleyn and really it was Queen Elizabeth that was born on the wrong side of the bed as the saying goes as he was not legally divorced from his wife proper. He was nothing more than an evil thug who had to get his own way in everything.
Conclusion.
No man is an island. If you break from Rome, don’t listen to her teachings, kill her priests, nuns, monks and anyone associated with the Roman Catholic Church, do more harm than good etc,
your not even a lapsed Catholic, your just not a Catholic as you only follow yourself and your evil ways. So in my mind Henry was no longer a Catholic, was a Catholic that is why the Pope gave him the title Defender of the Faith which should be handed back from the present Queen as she also does not agree with the teachings of the Original Church. Henry was like Luther, Calvin, and all the other guys who make up there own Religion, a Protestant, which means to protest, which Henry did, so yes he is a Protestant
Having the Bible but rejecting the religion that produced it is like taking the writings of the Dalai Lama and following his writings but rejecting him and the Tibetan Buddhism sounds silly doesn’t
it, why do it. If the writings are a refection of the religion but you reject the religion from which they came, you are left only with a reflection.