D
datritle
Guest
My mother asked me this last night, and I was dumbfounded…Was Mary baptized?
Mary received sanctifying grace at her Conception, so she did not need a Baptism by water to be saved. However, there is a tradition that she received the Sacrament of Baptism (by water) as an adult.My mother asked me this last night, and I was dumbfounded…Was Mary baptized?
Correct.Mary received sanctifying grace at her Conception, so she did not need a Baptism by water to be saved. However, there is a tradition that she received the Sacrament of Baptism (by water) as an adult.
No, which is further scriptural proof of her immaculate conception.My mother asked me this last night, and I was dumbfounded…Was Mary baptized?
If Jesus Christ Himself had to be baptized… why not Mary??? Was he lower than Mary?No, which is further scriptural proof of her immaculate conception.
Whats ur source on this ?No, which is further scriptural proof of her immaculate conception.
Although, he did not receive the sacrament of Baptism, but only John’s Baptism.Just because Mary was immmaculate doesn’t mean she wasn’t baptized. Even Jesus (being God) was baptized!
It was He who instigated the sacrament of Baptism with John’s cooperation for with His Baptism the waters were made Holy for all that spiritually followed Him. Jesus had to be Baptized for the sake of our Baptisms; therefore, the greatest of Baptisms. Please, don’t characterize it as a lesser Baptism.Although, he did not receive the sacrament of Baptism, but only John’s Baptism.
The baptisms with water done by John the Baptist actually were lesser to the extent that they did not forgive sins, unlike baptism by water in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit which do forgive sins.It was He who instigated the sacrament of Baptism with John’s cooperation for with His Baptism the waters were made Holy for all that spiritually followed Him. Jesus had to be Baptized for the sake of our Baptisms; therefore, the greatest of Baptisms. Please, don’t characterize it as a lesser Baptism.
Mary’s would be only symbolic being already “full of grace”, but I would guess necessary as a good/perfect example.
Are u suggesting Mary was never Baptized …or that Christ & Apostles would not of thought it needful for her ?The baptisms with water done by John the Baptist actually were lesser to the extent that they did not forgive sins, unlike baptism by water in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit which do forgive sins.
In the case of Mary there would be no need for the “greater” baptism because she was immaculately conceived
.
The purpose of baptism is to remove all sin.Are u suggesting Mary was never Baptized …or that Christ & Apostles would not of thought it needful for her ?
Does the Church teach your idea ?
Baptism also confers a permanent character on the soul, signifying membership in the Church. Jesus and Mary did not need Baptism to be saved, or to confer sanctifying grace, or to forgive sins. But it was fitting (not necessary) for them each to receive a type of Baptism to have the same character on their souls as those who imitate them have, as all formal members of the Church have.The purpose of baptism is to remove all sin.
Mary was free from original sin and committed no personal mortal sins. Why would she need a baptism? There was no sin to remove.
Mary taught “do whatever he tells you”The purpose of baptism is to remove all sin.
Mary was free from original sin and committed no personal mortal sins. Why would she need a baptism? There was no sin to remove.
I am not saying she was not baptised. I am saying she had no need to be baptised.Mary taught “do whatever he tells you”
CHRIST taught " ye must be born again, with WATER & the HOLY SPIRIT"
I rest my case …Mary WAS BAPTIZED IN WATER.
SOMEHOW, SOMETIME, SOMEPLACE !!
Was it by John the Baptizer, the Apostles( most probable) … or by Christ himself…even if by his own blood from Calvary…when she held him in her arms, wrapped his body, and laid him to rest ?