Was the Pope misquoted?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michaeldeepsky
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Michaeldeepsky

Guest
Recently, Pope Francis declared that there are animals in heaven. I understood that
the long teaching of the catholic church has been that since animals do not have
souls they are not in heaven. Please comment and clarify?
 
The Catholic Church does not have an official teaching on animals in heaven. Pope Francis did not say anything about animals in heaven. The media twisted, distorted and manufactured quotes from Pope Francis and other media outlets never fact checked the story and simply repeated it.

Here’s Jimmy Akin’s National Catholic Register article Did Pope Francis say animals go to heaven?
 
Did the Pope say, " You don’t have to go to church. For many nature can be a church. One can be spiritual and not religious. Some of the best people did not believe in God while some of the worst deeds were done in His name"?

What about the Sacraments?
Was he misquoted?
This is going around on Facebook and a lot of Catholics are confused and some non- christians are thrilled.

Help.

Nicola
 
There is no evidence that those words were ever spoken by Pope Francis.

Even the website Snopes looked into this quote and determined:
…the quote appended to the image that circulated in December 2014 does not match any verifiable comments made by Pope Francis…It’s not clear where the quote originated, but there is no proof (nor is there precedent) for the claim Pope Francis voiced it.
 
Use this thread to post questions about recent alleged quotes from Pope Francis.

This thread is to provide a reference to Q/A; it is not a debate thread. Please refrain from making comments about any quotes.
 
On face book someone posted that Pope Francis said “one day, we will see our animals in the eternity of Christ. Paradise is open to all God’s creatures.” Did he really say this? Doesn’t this go against the teachings that only humans have eternal souls? Apparently this was covered on NBC nightly news
 
Pope Francis never said dogs were going to heaven
… There’s only one problem: apparently none of it ever happened.
Yes, a version of that quotation was uttered by a pope, but it was said decades ago by Paul VI, who died in 1978. There is no evidence that Francis repeated the words during his public audience on Nov. 26, as has been widely reported, nor was there was a boy mourning his dead dog.
… Part of the answer may be the topic of the pope’s talk to the crowd that day, which centered on the End Times and the transformation of all creation into a “new heaven” and a “new earth.” Citing St. Paul in the New Testament, Francis said that is not “the annihilation of the cosmos and of everything around us, but the bringing of all things into the fullness of being.”
The trail of digital bread crumbs then appears to lead to an Italian news report that extended Francis’ discussion of a renewed creation to the question of whether animals too will go to heaven.
For a full explanation, see:
cruxnow.com/church/2014/12/13/pope-francis-says-all-dogs-go-to-heaven-not-so-fast/
 
Here is a full quote of what the pope said:

Maillard: Holy Father, yesterday at mass you spoke about religious freedom as a fundamental human right. But in the respect for the different religions, up to what point can one go in freedom of expression? That too is a fundamental human right.

Pope. Thanks for the question, it’s an intelligent one. I believe that both are fundamental human rights, religious liberty and liberty of expression. One cannot – but let’s think – you are French? Let’s go to Paris, let’s speak clearly. One cannot hide a truth: everyone has the right to practice one’s religion, one’s own religion without giving offence. Freely. That’s how we do it, we want everyone to do that. Second: One cannot offend, make war, kill in the name of one’s own religion, that is, in the name of God. To us, that which happens now, it stuns us. But let’s think about our own history: how many wars of religion have we had? You may think of the night of St. Bartholomew; how can this be understood? We too were sinners in this. But one cannot kill in the name of God. This is an aberration. To kill in the name of God is an aberration. I believe that this is the principal point in terms of religious liberty. One has freedom in this, but without imposing or killing in the name of religion.

As for freedom of expression: each one not only has the freedom, the right but also the obligation to say what one thinks to help the common good. The obligation! Let’s think, if a member of parliament or a senator doesn’t say what he thinks is the right path then he does not collaborate for the common good. Not only these, but many others too. We have the obligation to say openly, to have this liberty, but without giving offence, because it is true, one cannot react violently. But if Dr. Gasbarri (the papal trip organizer who was standing beside him), a good friend, says a bad word against my mother, then a punch awaits him. But it’s normal, it’s normal. One cannot provoke, one cannot insult other people’s faith, one cannot make fun of faith. Pope Benedict in a speech, I don’t remember exactly where, he spoke of this post-positivist mentality, of post-positivist metaphysics, that led to the belief that in the end religions, religious expressions, are a kind of subculture, which are tolerated but are of little value, are not on the Enlightenment culture. And this is part of the heritage of the Enlightenment. And so many people who speak badly about other religions, or religions [in general], they make fun of, let’s say toy with [make into toys] other people’s religions, these people provoke and there can occur what would happen to Dr. Gasbarri if he said something against my mother. That is, there is a limit. Every religion has dignity; every religion that respects life, human life, the human person. And I cannot make fun of it. This is a limit and I have taken this sense of limit to say that in freedom of expression there are limits, like that in regard to my mother. I don’t know if I have managed to answer the question.

Lombardi: Thanks Holy Father. We’ve now been more than half an hour here, and we said we could stop when you are a little tired. You want us to continue some more, all right. But you tell us when you want to stop. The next in line is Joshua McElwee of the National Catholic Reporter.

McElwee: Thank you again Holy Father for the time. You have spoken many times against religious extremism. Do you have some concrete idea for how to involve other religious leaders to combat this problem, maybe a meeting in Assisi like Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI had?

Pope: Thank you. This proposal has already been made. I know that some are working on this. And I have spoken with Cardinal Tauran, who is in the inter-religious dialogue, and he has heard about this. I know that the uneasiness has not come from us, it has come from other religions in the area. I don’t know how if there’s something involving organization, but there’s something in the air.

en.radiovaticana.va/news/2015/01/15/pope_francis_says_there_are_limits_to_freedom_of_expression/1118400

For information on the ‘night of St. Bartholomew’ see:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Bartholomew%27s_Day_massacre
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top