I doubt the media will pay this any attention! ShameJust when you thought the sex talk had moved the revelations of the emails off the front page, … Hillary’s email problems come roaring back.
washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/17/hillary-clintons-email-problems-just-came-roaring-back/
However, as also reported in the Washington Post:Just when you thought the sex talk had moved the revelations of the emails off the front page, … Hillary’s email problems come roaring back.
washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/17/hillary-clintons-email-problems-just-came-roaring-back/
It was already known that there were sometimes disagreements between the State Department and the FBI over how some emails were classified. But if anyone was seeking a “quid pro quo”, it appears to have been the official from the FBI.One FBI official conceded that he told the State Department employee he would “look into” changing the classification of a Clinton email if the official would lend his authority to an FBI request to increase its personnel in Iraq, according to documents released by the bureau Monday.
It’s amazing to me that someone could read a story in the *Washington Post *(which has to the very definition of “mainstream media”), and then worry that the media won’t pay any attention to the story.I doubt the media will pay this any attention! Shame
Oh, right, God forbid the American people should actually have to read a story in a real newspaper rather than having everything reduced to tweets or screaming headlines on a clickbait site.Someone needs to gather all of this information and present it in a way the American people will understand where the people do not have to read through it and try to figure it out legally.
You misunderstand my post. I didn’t say anything about tweets or screaming headlines. I am talking about a comprehensive presentation of the depth and seriousness of what has transpired. There is way too much information to put in a tweet or headline.Oh, right, God forbid the American people should actually have to read a story in a real newspaper rather than having everything reduced to tweets or screaming headlines on a clickbait site.
Look, one of the problems of this election (whatever side you’re on – there’s blame enough to go around here) is that people don’t want to “read through” a story. They want simple headlines that reinforce what they already think.
That is pretty darn sad, if you ask me. If that’s true, we deserve what we’re going to get, whether that’s Trump or Clinton.
Plus I just saw on FOX the FBI suggesting they could reclassify some e-mails in exchange for allowing some agents to be able to be placed in currently unauthorized locations. So the FBI, Patrick Kennedy in particular in the State Department, were trying to cut a deal!!! During an investigation!!!I’ve been watching FBI Director James Comey’s Testimony and so far, for the life of me, I cannot fathom, how the deletion (not just deleted but wiped so they could not be recovered) is somehow not an obstruction of justice and the destroying of evidence?
From my understanding, her Lawyers got the emails, sorted them, gave the ones they wanted to the FBI and deleted the rest. That says guilty! not enough to prosecute, fair enough (of course, they wiped evidence), but guilty certainly.
And on top of that, the fact she is running for president? you have got to be kidding me!
Very interesting - youtube.com/watch?v=r_VnQQClAUk
I hope this has helped
God Bless
Thank you for reading
Josh
And they are out to destroy America!!! God Bless, MemawBecause the country is in love the Democratic Party and they all most media outlets in their pockets. There is no unbiased reporting anymore. It has a strong left-leaning bias. And that’s just for starters.
It’s really something, isn’t it?I still can’t believe ppl support this unindicted felon!!!
The Republicans should have thought of that before choosing a guy that is even worse. I would love a solid mainstream Republican to vote for at this point.I still can’t believe ppl support this unindicted felon!!!
Yep, the media always loved Trump until he decided to run for president. All of a sudden he’s a bad guy!!! Really?The Republicans should have thought of that before choosing a guy that is even worse. I would love a solid mainstream Republican to vote for at this point.
What solid mainstream Republican would suit you? Jeb, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan? Just these four would be considered conservative lite.The Republicans should have thought of that before choosing a guy that is even worse. I would love a solid mainstream Republican to vote for at this point.
We can’t give them the candy store again!What solid mainstream Republican would suit you? Jeb, John Kasich, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan? Just these four would be considered conservative lite.
There’s a reason Trump got the nod, it’s because folks like the four listed above have stabbed the conservative movement in the back. We have voted for conservatives in the past 30 years and almost each and every time they go to Washington and vote against the very reason they were elected.
In the primary I’ve voted for Ted Cruz and in the general I’m gonna vote for Donald Trump. I hope that Donald Trump he will renegotiate the economic agreements we have with all these countries. In typical fashion, we gave away the store and made it sound as if it was a win for us.
if Hillary wins I hope the Senate in the house also goes with her. I’d like to see the Senate get a large enough majority that it’s filibuster proof. Let’s give the liberals the power they want and see if it works out.
This same excuse has been used in prior election years. It was used to justify voting Obama instead of Romney or McCain, or Bush instead of Gore or Kerry. It was even used to justify voting for Clinton over Bush and Dole.The Republicans should have thought of that before choosing a guy that is even worse. I would love a solid mainstream Republican to vote for at this point.
Because they are only glossing over it. The NY Times put the story on page 23 instead of the front page. And many are ignoring all the other damning information coming out. They are “covering” it by lightly touching on it.It’s amazing to me that someone could read a story in the *Washington Post *(which has to the very definition of “mainstream media”), and then worry that the media won’t pay any attention to the story.
YupBecause they are only glossing over it. The NY Times put the story on page 23 instead of the front page. And many are ignoring all the other damning information coming out. They are “covering” it by lightly touching on it.
They aren’t going full bore on the dozens of revelations we’ve seen from the leaked emails.