Perhaps a lot of it (Muslims being angry about in particular about bad satire, with “bad satire” being a mild expression considering e.g. that many anti-Muslims apparently consider pedophilia to be better than zoophilia) has to do with that there are persons sitting ‘protected’ by nukes in cosy homes, perhaps feasting on (nearly) extinct flora and fauna species, more or less decadent, with more or less a holier than thou attitude, turning oceans and rivers and everything into an acid wasteland, with many left to survive by prostitution, and with cruelty of animals including passive cruelty, not realizing that the “greatest” achievements are from times past? All while there are others, yet basically the same, hoping that there will be at least as much food after harvest for the whole family as individuals, cynical or not, elsewhere have for their side-dish while slurping concentration camp drink and food products, driving ‘fancy’ cars holding ‘fancy’ phones, and perhaps even pretending to know it all so or so or in any case better than them “others” such as supposed savage-persons who lived a “long time” ago yet were capable of at least as much physical, and mental or intellectual efforts as we are today and that with less surrounding means thereto.
Exaggeration? i think it is a rather a mild description of part of the state of everything on this planet.
Nevertheless, from a more or less non-critical viewpoint, one thing is about globalization and the content thereof. As an example, sodomy laws in countries on the African continent introduced by the oh so civilized and then decades or centuries later it is the same oh so civilized who are like oh those sodomy laws are completly wrong. Sure, conditions (of society and environment) change, and we as individuals and society are learning beings and probably always will be, and development needs to be partially natural (such as that a tree grows from a seed for many years). But what good are “high on horse” attitudes doing (for others) if any at all?
in that context, satire has (not only) in countries on the European continent more or less tradition. And in that tradition mocking of Jesus (Christ) is a good sign in the meaning that He is considered King who is in favour of freedom of speech eversince and not taking Himself much seriously. Though that last sentence being a bit of irony as many (Christians) are probably foremostly happy abut having a peaceful life without being persecuted for the sake of it, and e.g.
bumpshack.com/2011/04/28/queen-elizabeth-ii-bans-satire-of-royal-wedding/
showing that Jesus is even about 2000 years later serving humanity by being a target of bullies of all sort, as apparently in particular in Great Britain it is alright to mock the poor and destitute, but oh no, not the fancy ones. Something which isn’t just about the UK, e.g.
torontosun.com/news/weird/2010/09/13/15331591.html
And the issue of scripture being laid out on anti-Christ’s terms is not something unknown to Christians neither. Or in particular choosing concerning actual real life issues, such as doing something by non-islamic urf and then pretending, or thinking, that the particular act was islamic (arguably to an extent for own security such as having a fake building permit and in front of court claiming, knowingly or unknowingly, that it isn’t fake). Similarly, from what i know any person is of age at age of 15 (not only) in Islam, though there obviously possibly being a problem with fake papers or false claims of parent/s, not only in regard to age-number but also in regard to other numbers.
As for ‘defenders of morality’, and Aisha and Mohammed, who biologically lived as such more than 1000 years ago, of importance is the social environment and conceptions thereof as well as factualities of life at that time, with many stories having educational merit at least back then. Similarly, “consummate” is not necessarily a word to describe sex, though even if or even if there was any sex e.g. when Aisha was 9 years old, fixation thereon seems to be of psychoanalytical terms and not of actual real care. Yes, idolatry, and in particular child sex is wrong, regardless of whether a child was trained for such (e.g. elder women telling girls that a “good wife” has to take it any way and any time he wants, or other form of social “pressure” for that matter) or not. As for child marriage itself, one aspect are “political unions”, something of which there are plenty of in history of countries on the European continent as well, and arguably many if not all of these
theroyalforums.com/forums/f164/the-youngest-royal-brides-in-history-17081.html
were such as well. And a bit different aspect (not necessarily being the base of the aforementioned though arguably pointing it out) being that of if a e.g.-6-years old terminally ill girl dreams of being married and held before death, would it really be that evil to grant her such wish?
