P
Peter_J
Guest
Dude, stop trying to force your love of the papacy on us!I think it’s safe to say the pope is *not *poorly catechized.
:no emoticon needed:
Dude, stop trying to force your love of the papacy on us!I think it’s safe to say the pope is *not *poorly catechized.
We are born with original sin. Because of that, we cannot get to heaven and we can’t live in heaven. There is nothing in our nature that can change this, no amount of natural goodness, kindness etc. We can’t build a rocket and fly there and we can’t build a cannon and shoot ourselves there. If we die in this state, our soul will fall into the abyss. However, there is a gift that can change that, that can cause our souls to go to heaven and allow us to live there, and that power is called Sanctifying Grace. If we die with sanctifying grace, we will spend eternity in heaven. If we die without it, we will spend eternity in hell. Everything the church does comes down to conferring, defending, increasing, or restoring Sanctifying Grace.So…are you imagining that a loving, wise God has arranged it so that, say, a “bad”, unkind, yet baptized person who believes God exists is* closer *to “walking the path of salvation” …than, say, a good, kind person who generously helps and loves her fellow man/woman throughout her life, but has not had water sprinkled on her forehead and doesn’t go to a specific church?
If so…that would be quite an illogical God, who does this.
And I find it very…interesting…that you are certain which people in this world will *definitely **not *be saved by this God.
Even the pope, the leader of your faith and the worldwide Catholic Church, has said he does not know this information.
And yet…you do.
LOL. I do adore this pope! Tis true! I plan to go meet him this year!
.
I never. claimed to know who is and who is not in heaven or for that matter who is in hell. Hell exists though. I don’t relish in that fact, but it does. The scriptures are very clear on that and they are also very clear that not everyone will be in heaven. Please don’t put words in my mouth that make me appear arrogant. Also, Lordhavemercy’s post is spot on when it comes to original sin and the path of salvation. I couldn’t have said it better myself.So…are you imagining that a loving, wise God has arranged it so that, say, a “bad”, unkind, yet baptized person who believes God exists is* closer *to “walking the path of salvation” …than, say, a good, kind person who generously helps and loves her fellow man/woman throughout her life, but has not had water sprinkled on her forehead and doesn’t go to a specific church?
If so…that would be quite an illogical God, who does this.
And I find it very…interesting…that you are certain which people in this world will *definitely **not *be saved by this God.
Even the pope, the leader of your faith and the worldwide Catholic Church, has said he does not know this information.
And yet…you do.
LOL. I do adore this pope! Tis true! I plan to go meet him this year!
.
According to Cardinal Kasper, back when he was in charge of ecumenism, this may indeed be the case. In the context of distinguishing between dialogue with other religions and ecumenism (which only involves baptized Christians), he said it is baptism that allows us to pray the Our Father:I think that it may be an err to teach that God is only the Father of baptized people.
would not saying that mean that it is foolish for an unbaptized person to pray the Lord’s Prayer?
vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20020107_peace-kasper_en.htmlThe ecumenical dialogue and the interreligious dialogue are connected and overlap, but are not identical with each other another. There is a specific, qualitative difference between them and, therefore, they should not be confused. Ecumenical dialogues are not only based on the tolerance and respect due for every human and religious conviction; nor are they founded solely on liberal philanthropy or mere polite courtesy; on the contrary, ecumenical dialogue is rooted in the common faith in Jesus Christ and the reciprocal recognition of baptism, which means that all the baptized become members of the one Body of Christ (cf. Gal 3,28); I Cor 12,13; Ut unum sint, n. 42) and can pray the"Our Father" together, as Jesus taught us. In other religions the Church recognizes a ray of that truth “that enlightens every man” (Jn 1,9), but is revealed in its fullness only in Jesus Christ; only he is “the Way, the Truth and the Life” (Jn 14,6; cf. Nostra aetate, n. 2). It is therefore ambiguous to refer to interreligious dialogue in terms of macro-ecumenism or of a new and vaster phase of ecumenism.
Christians and the followers of other religions can pray, but cannot pray together. Every form of syncretism is to be excluded.
God bless Pope Francis, God bless the message that we do indeed worship the One and only God.The video definitely smacks of indifferentism. One could very easily interpret it as a message from the Pope that all religions are equal because we are all children of God, just seeking him on different, but equally valid, paths.
The “characters” in the video - a Protestant, a Jew, a Muslim and a Budhist - are portrayed in a positive and affirming light without any suggestion that they are missing anything or living with less than the full Truth, or need Jesus, or that the Catholic Church has anything special to offer them.
I was particularly troubled by the conclusion of the video, where 4 sets of hands lift up a baby Jesus, a Jewish menora, a statue of Budha, and a set of Islamic prayer beads toward the center of the screen together - the clear implication being that they are all equally valid ways of worshiping God and we should simply accept one another without seeking to convert anyone.
I am quite sure that many, many people who watch the video will take this message away. The message is too overt and well-crafted for it to have been an “accident” of sloppy or poorly thought out media production. It goes wll beyond “can’t we all just get along?”
This is particularly problematic given the currently dominant worldview that the only true religion is “love” - i.e., that there is no need to worship any particular God, in any particular way, so long as we love one another and seek God as we understand him.
There is a very large “faction” within the Catholic Church that supports this view. Pope Francis has stated that he feels the greatest failure of the post-Vatican II Church has been in the area of ecumenism, and that he believes he has the “audacity” to try to rectify this failure. Personally, I feel that while ecumenism has its place and its purpose, it can never be allowed to replace or take precedence over evangelization. And that’s what bothers me so much about this video.
Hi Don thank you for the question and observations. This is a very relevant question to the day in which we live, I offer this as it asks the questions as to why all the Prophets have come and sacraficed;Tony, I am sure it feels good to say that, but:
Are you saying it makes no difference how we conceive of God, so long as we pay homage to the God we perceive, and so long as we “love one another”? Are you saying that is all that really mattters, so Budhists and Muslims and Jews should be affirmed as Budhists and Muslims and Jews so long as they worship their God and “love”? Are you sayng that they need not be evangelized to reject their false religions and become disciples of Jesus Christ?
I would ask you to please explain how Budhists worship the same God as Christians, given that Gautama Buddha rejected the existence of a creator deity?
Or why it makes no difference that Muslims consider the concept of a Holy Trinity composed of Father, Son and Holy Spirit to be blasphemy? Can it be “okay” to claim that the true nature of God as he has revealed himself to mankind (i.e., as the Holy Trinity) is an abomination?
The Vatican II Fathers said that it is not impossible for those outside the formal boundaries of the Church to be saved. They did not say that it was likely, or probable. They did not say that we should stand down in our efforts to evangelize them and instead affirm them in their beliefs as being on equally valid paths to God. The result of such a position would be to render Christianity meaningless by allowing everyone to make up their own concept of God so long as they “love”. It denies that God is an actual, personal BEING with particular CHARACERISTICS who deserves to be WORSHIPPED for who he is. In other words, it renders religion superfluous. That may be nice but it is not Catholicsm and it is not Christianity.
Very well said, thank you very much for writing this.The Vatican II Fathers said that it is not impossible for those outside the formal boundaries of the Church to be saved. They did not say that it was likely, or probable. They did not say that we should stand down in our efforts to evangelize them and instead affirm them in their beliefs as being on equally valid paths to God. The result of such a position would be to render Christianity meaningless by allowing everyone to make up their own concept of God so long as they “love”. It denies that God is an actual, personal BEING with particular CHARACERISTICS who deserves to be WORSHIPPED for who he is. In other words, it renders religion superfluous. That may be nice but it is not Catholicsm and it is not Christianity.
The problem is that those who are not saved by faith through Christ and hence not covered by his grace are under the law–whether that be the written law of the Jews or the same principles of that law in the heart of all people. Breaking one of God’s laws merits damnation and who can keep the whole law without breaking it once? This is why Jesus is so precious because He frees us from the tyranny of the law with forgiveness. But you have to ask to receive it. No one should presume upon God’s mercy. Thank Jesus for reconciling us to the Father! Praise Him!I didn’t say you claimed to know who is in hell or heaven. But you did say who will not be saved, and that there is nothing we can do to change that.
You wrote:
“He/she is not saved by living by the golden rule. When it comes to our salvation, **we bring nothing to the table.”
**
Do you think people who live only “by the Golden Rule” can be “saved”…or not?
.
I can understand that they may be many Catholics who are not comfortable with the video or may be disturbed by the role of Pope Francis in it. As for me, my earlier posts being self-explained, I would take it in context, which I feel very important to derive any opinion on it.The video definitely smacks of indifferentism. One could very easily interpret it as a message from the Pope that all religions are equal because we are all children of God, just seeking him on different, but equally valid, paths.
The “characters” in the video - a Protestant, a Jew, a Muslim and a Budhist - are portrayed in a positive and affirming light without any suggestion that they are missing anything or living with less than the full Truth, or need Jesus, or that the Catholic Church has anything special to offer them.
I was particularly troubled by the conclusion of the video, where 4 sets of hands lift up a baby Jesus, a Jewish menora, a statue of Budha, and a set of Islamic prayer beads toward the center of the screen together - the clear implication being that they are all equally valid ways of worshiping God and we should simply accept one another without seeking to convert anyone.
I am quite sure that many, many people who watch the video will take this message away. The message is too overt and well-crafted for it to have been an “accident” of sloppy or poorly thought out media production. It goes wll beyond “can’t we all just get along?”
This is particularly problematic given the currently dominant worldview that the only true religion is “love” - i.e., that there is no need to worship any particular God, in any particular way, so long as we love one another and seek God as we understand him.
There is a very large “faction” within the Catholic Church that supports this view. Pope Francis has stated that he feels the greatest failure of the post-Vatican II Church has been in the area of ecumenism, and that he believes he has the “audacity” to try to rectify this failure. Personally, I feel that while ecumenism has its place and its purpose, it can never be allowed to replace or take precedence over evangelization. And that’s what bothers me so much about this video.
My friend, I am certain of original sin and its consequences because it is a dogma of the faith, it’s more certain than the sun coming up tomorrow. The someone “who figured out what sacrament rituals to employ to give ‘sanctifying grace’” was God. Literally God, in the flesh, came to earth, and gave us everything we need.Again, like the other post…you sound very certain of this.
But I thought God supposedly makes a decision who goes to heaven or not using mercy, says the pope.
And what about all those people who died before the church was put together, people were given titles, and someone figured out what sacrament rituals to employ to give “sanctifying grace”?
So…now it sounds as tho you are saying we can’t know what God will choose for someone’s soul, right?
I have never said otherwise. We know there’s one sure path (baptism, the other sacraments dying in the state of grace) and we cannot place any confidence in any other path. We don’t know if God makes secret little exceptions here and there. If we truly love our non-Catholic neighbors, we won’t prevent them from converting and being baptized, and sharing in the beautiful life for us, by pretending that they’re already safe in their current religion. If someone is drowning, you don’t talk about how beautiful the water is, you throw them a life jacket.
No one can put a limit to Christ’s mercy. Could it be that someone can find faith In Christ after death? Possibly.Okay, I think you answered my question here. I think you are agreeing that even if a person dies *without *sanctifying grace, it’s still possible that they go to heaven and not spend an eternity in hell.
Yes?
(which is different than what your earlier post said).
.
No. If you die without sanctifying grace, that’s it. No heaven. But sanctifying grace is bestowed by God and only He can chose how to bestow it. I’m thankful that God gave us one way to definitely receive sanctifying grace, that’s more than we deserve already. Whatever God chooses to do is perfect. As a convert, I have to face the daily reality that my non-Catholic family members, who I love so dearly, could be excluding themselves from heaven by refusing to become Catholic, and it would not make God mean/cruel/unmerciful/unjust if that happened. I simply pray that they will convert, and trust that God will give them every chance to do so.Okay, I think you answered my question here. I think you are agreeing that even if a person dies *without *sanctifying grace, it’s still possible that they go to heaven and not spend an eternity in hell.
Yes?
(which is different than what your earlier post said).
.
No. If you die without sanctifying grace, that’s it. No heaven. But sanctifying grace is bestowed by God and only He can chose how to bestow it. I’m thankful that God gave us one way to definitely receive sanctifying grace, that’s more than we deserve already. Whatever God chooses to do is perfect. As a convert, I have to face the daily reality that my non-Catholic family members, who I love so dearly, could be excluding themselves from heaven by refusing to become Catholic, and it would not make God mean/cruel/unmerciful/unjust if that happened. I simply pray that they will convert, and trust that God will give them every chance to do so.
I have an anecdote that helped me see a bit beyond. I understand what you are saying.
Thank you for sharing. As I am not yet a father, I cannot yet understand the love that a parent has for a child, but I have so much admiration for it. It’s really beautiful.I have an anecdote that helped me see a bit beyond. I understand what you are saying.
Our two youngest kids had difficulties at school. They were responsible and very nice kids but average in a very demandung school. At a very young age , more than a healthy challenge it became an endurance race. And their self esteem was coming down. So we lovingly worked with them and finally changed them.to another school , exvelent one but with a more suitable system for their skills.
They flourished ,became happy and started learning with great pleasure. So much so , that they played together after school bringing curiosity and interest to their learning and activities after school.
Such was their joy and change that our eldest became interested in what had happened and started watching them attentively.
In turn , after a couple of years ,our eldest asked for a change. He loved his peers but as bright as he was ,he realized there was that joy and genuine learning interest that he lacked and these two siblings displayed with such happiness.
I do not have recipes ,but we " understood" how something so deep and so encouraging could draw the best out of life stories.
Sharing. Not disputing anything. Just a story close to my heart.
Be at peace. I could connect with that love you expressed for your relatives . And though some posts are kind of cold and neutral ,and it is fine ,yours came across.as one you experienced in your heart.Thank you for sharing. As I am not yet a father, I cannot yet understand the love that a parent has for a child, but I have so much admiration for it. It’s really beautiful.
I’ve tried every combination of fonts and smileys, and have decided there is no way to ask this question that makes it sound nice, so please just trust that I am asking this without the slightest bit of sarcasm or rudeness: could you help me to draw the line between your story and my post? I truly want to understand what you are saying.
I know, the question reads in a very compative tone, but if we were discussing face to face it probably wouldn’t. I think.![]()
You are not alone in your hopes for your Family. There are Muslims that pray this for this Families, there are Baha’i’s that Pray this for their Families.No. If you die without sanctifying grace, that’s it. No heaven. But sanctifying grace is bestowed by God and only He can chose how to bestow it. I’m thankful that God gave us one way to definitely receive sanctifying grace, that’s more than we deserve already. Whatever God chooses to do is perfect. As a convert, I have to face the daily reality that my non-Catholic family members, who I love so dearly, could be excluding themselves from heaven by refusing to become Catholic, and it would not make God mean/cruel/unmerciful/unjust if that happened. I simply pray that they will convert, and trust that God will give them every chance to do so.