T
TomH1
Guest
Thank you!
Its sad if Catholics do not want to forgive the Russian Orthodox faithful Christians for something that was done in the past under a totalitarian dictatorship and for things done which were out of their control. There was a war going on against Nazi Germany which was putting innocent people in gas chambers. And as you know, there were Ukrainian Greek Catholics who welcomed the Nazis as they entered Ukraine.Well the reason we hate the Russian Orthodox Church so much is because they suppressed our Church, imprisoned our bishops, and killed our priests for half a century.
I am thinking about the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) operating in the Nazi occupied areas which carried out a vicious genocidal massacre against minorities in Volhunia, Eastern Galicia with the support of many of the local Ukrainian population. Innocent people were tortured and mutilated and this was carried out with the support of the Bandera faction of the Organisation of Ukrainian nationalists. And is it true that Polish-born German historian Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe described “active and direct participation of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church in support of the OUN-UPA, precisely as a movement with a pro-fascist ideology.” ?Think before you speak, please.
???Its sad if Catholics do not want to forgive the Russian Orthodox faithful Christians for something that was done in the past
gee, folks coming in shooting at the folks who execute us. How shall we react?And as you know, there were Ukrainian Greek Catholics who welcomed the Nazis as they entered Ukraine.
Sounds funny, coming from someone who likes to bring up (on multiple threads to same effect) excommunications of 1054, sack of Constantinople, Croatians vs Serbs, atrocities of Athos and etc …Its sad if Catholics do not want to forgive the Russian Orthodox faithful Christians for something that was done in the past under a totalitarian dictatorship and for things done which were out of their control.
I guess I understand essence of what he means to say, but that statement makes me very sad. Is there so little in common between Eastern Catholics and Latin Catholics? If we just look at things we went through together and things we opposed together, we can see it isn’t as true as some would like it to be. It would be like saying Latin Church has more in common with sedevacantists/anglicans/old catholics than with Eastern Catholics. Rites do not define the Church, but Church defines the rites… and as such, full communion defines the essence of the Church. Rites exist to bring divine closer to us, to make us feel and live according to tradition of the Church and of our ancestors… but Catholics share all the divine things with Catholics, no matter the rite…“we have everything in common with the Orthodox except communion, and little in common with Rome, except for communion.”
However sad, it is a fact in Western Christianity as well. I am not in communion with my father who is Evangelical, but I am in communion with every single person belonging to the Catholic Church in any country you choose, however distant it may be. Reality of schisms is still there to this day, and just because we are family, friends and neighbors with different faith (or Church), it does not mean we are not all children of God. At the same time, it does not mean we should disregard fact we aren’t in full communion.He asks “Why are we (Melkites) in Communion with our most distant brothers, but not with our closest ones with whom we have family and neighborly ties…”
What sounds funny to me is:Sounds funny,
I was reading Matthew 5:24 and it gives a different slant on things.Well the reason we hate the Russian Orthodox Church so much…
When the Nazis invaded France, people were openly crying in the streets.How shall we react?
Obviously as doc has explained, situation was different in France. Was someone executing the French and Nazis came to fight those people? Probably not. Context matters.When the Nazis invaded France, people were openly crying in the streets.
According to David, Ukrainians do not hate those who belong to the Russian Orthodox Church, but Russian Orthodox Church itself… so that does not exactly apply. If, however, situation is that Russian Orthodox Christians are hated (not necessarily their church as institution), you’re right.I was reading Matthew 5:24 and it gives a different slant on things.
Who was executing ukrainians and why were they executed? If Russians are so hated in Ukraine, why did the Ukrainians elect a Moscow puppet for President?Was someone executing the French and Nazis came to fight those people?
Yes, I am from Ukraine but I did not vote for the comic.
The comic(our current president) is Moscow puppet.
From the Melkite Horologion:I guess I understand essence of what he means to say, but that statement makes me very sad. Is there so little in common between Eastern Catholics and Latin Catholics?
I would agree with this statement. The Latin Church has way more in common liturgically and spiritually with these ecclesiastical communities. What the Latin Church shares with Eastern Catholics is communion. I really don’t see what is bad about this. When people think this is a bad thing I feel it really means, “they should really be Roman Catholics with just a different Liturgy.”It would be like saying Latin Church has more in common with sedevacantists/anglicans/old catholics than with Eastern Catholics.
Actually would mean Ukrainian Catholics do not hate Russians but only what their Church is doing. Wonderful, furthers up our points.Who was executing ukrainians and why were they executed? If Russians are so hated in Ukraine, why did the Ukrainians elect a Moscow puppet for President?
Theology wasn’t diverse because of Rites.The early Church shared the same faith but was diverse in its theology as we see in UNITATIS REDINTEGRATIO .
Yes, but liturgy and spirituality are secondary to Church- primary things are unity, apostolicity, sanctity and universality.The Latin Church has way more in common liturgically and spiritually with these ecclesiastical communities.
That’s a sentiment that should be stopped, but minority of people who are somehow educated in faith hold this. People who hold this also generally think Latin Rite is Mass alone anyway.When people think this is a bad thing I feel it really means, “they should really be Roman Catholics with just a different Liturgy.”
A “rite” is much more than liturgical patrimony.Theology wasn’t diverse because of Rites.
I’m just saying, this is flying pretty close to sounding like Latin dominance.Yes, but liturgy and spirituality are secondary to Church- primary things are unity, apostolicity, sanctity and universality.
Why? Are Easterners not in unity, not apostolic, not universal or are they not striving towards sanctity? How is that Latin at all?I’m just saying, this is flying pretty close to sounding like Latin dominance.
Yet concept of Rites was not necessarily present, not in fashion we know it today. There were theological schools, but they were not limited by rites.A “rite” is much more than liturgical patrimony.
Because what is sung/chanted in the Divine Liturgy is what we believe. Our theology is expressed in the Divine Liturgy. Our spirituality is expressed in the Divine Liturgy.Why?
I think what it really means is that most Ukrainians are OK with Russians and the use of the Russian language in Ukraine. But there is a small element of Ukrainian nationalists whose organization had been allied with the Nazis and who were responsible for massacres and executions. They are the fascist oriented, neoNazi types who want all Russians out of Ukraine and who do everything they can to provoke hatred against Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church. It was the the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) operating in the Nazi occupied areas which carried out a vicious genocidal massacre against minorities in Volhunia, Eastern Galicia. And please look up what was done by the Bandera faction of the Organisation of Ukrainian nationalists. Unfortunately, according to the Polish-born German historian Grzegorz Rossolinski-Liebe, elements in the Ukrainian Greek catholic church supported the OUN-UPA. This is the element, not the majority of Ukrainians, that welcomed the Nazis as they entered Ukraine.Actually would mean Ukrainian Catholics do not hate Russians
Not solely. Same way Mass encompasses beliefs and truths, but not all of them.As I said, in the East, our beliefs are expressed in the Divine Liturgy and other liturgical services.
It is faith what we have in common, communion comes afterwards. We are part of Catholic Church, and partake of it’s apostolicity, unity, universality and sanctity. That is what we have in common. Expressions of faith are different but I would not go wrong using Eastern expressions in Latin Church anyway.How can you not see that Byzantine Catholics and Roman Catholics have only one thing in common, that is, communion?
That that includes us Orthodox, according UNITATIS REDINTEGRATIO and Ut Unum Sint.It is faith what we have in common . . .
That’s not true. Listen to the Troparions and Kontakions sung in the Divine Liturgy or what is sung at Vespers. They express what we believe. That’s why any Eastern Christian on this forum, Orthodox or Catholic, when asked what Eastern Christians believe, the answer is almost always, “go to the Divine Liturgy and find out.”Not solely.
Yeah but I doubt every single dogma is present in Liturgy alone.That’s not true. Listen to the Troparions and Kontakions sung in the Divine Liturgy or what is sung at Vespers. They express what we believe. That’s why any Eastern Christian on this forum, Orthodox or Catholic, when asked what Eastern Christians believe, the answer is almost always, “go to the Divine Liturgy and find out.”
Small f, but I guess so. Yet, they are not united with Catholic Church to this day. I understand our views on what constitutes the Church differ, but Eastern Catholics did accept Vatican I and hence hold to those views, at least they should.“Ecumenical contacts have thus made possible essential clarifications with regard to the traditional controversies concerning Christology, so much so that we have been able to profess together the faith which we have in common .”
Go to the Divine Liturgy and other liturgical services of the Byzantine Churches for a whole year and find out.Yeah but I doubt every single dogma is present in Liturgy alone.
Yes, but not only. Some dogmas require high theological education to fully comprehend. Is Palamism present in Orthodox Divine Liturgy? If so, I never noticed…Also how did Roman Catholics know what they believed before there was a Catechism? Lex orandi lex credendi (we pray what we believe).
I never attended for the whole year, but I spent my first semester at university attending almost exclusively Divine Liturgy. Granted, I still am stranger to many other Eastern services, but it isn’t like I attended only couple of times.Go to the Divine Liturgy and other liturgical services of the Byzantine Churches for a whole year and find out.
He is present, second Sunday of Great Lent:Is Palamism present in Orthodox Divine Liturgy?
Agreed, but no one had their own Bibles until only recently, and that said, the majority of the world is not quite literate.Yet we do not go by Bible alone, neither by Liturgy alone.
My mother-in-laws husband, both southern baptist (she became Catholic when she married my father-in-law but went back to her roots after their divorce) came with us on Theophany. He was amazed by they hymns and the teaching that came from them.I never attended for the whole year, but I spent my first semester at university attending almost exclusively Divine Liturgy.