R
Regular_Atheist
Guest
He said they are going to target sites, some of which are of high importance to Iranian culture. Your own quoted part of the tweet clearly states that.
There is nothing misleading about the op or it’s questions.
That statement is untrue and misleading.Trump threatens destruction of 52 cultural sites.
Yes. He did not say “ destruction of 52 cultural sites”. That is a false statement.He did not say “ destruction of 52 cultural sites”. That is a false statement
Yeah, but none of that matters because Trump did it.
Running for congress. Yes, and if you look at the video, he lost his legs in Iraq, so some say “We killed an “Iranian””, can they say Soleimani was a terrorist who killed many? And in Syria as well?
No. I’m deliberately being accurate, as opposed to the OP.So you’re deliberately being pedantic. The argument was that Trump is saying the USA will commit a war crime, which he is regardless of how he words that particular phrase.
SO, if Pres. Trump has lied 7,000 times, why in the world do you now believe him when he says he will bomb cultural sites???He has lied like 7000 times. Listening is irrational. He owes an explanation that complies with law. In this post I ask does anyone know what it is.
Good point.SO, if Pres. Trump has lied 7,000 times, why in the world do you now believe him when he says he will bomb cultural sites???
So clearly if he told Zelensky there was a quid pro quo he was lyingtuscany:![]()
Good point.SO, if Pres. Trump has lied 7,000 times, why in the world do you now believe him when he says he will bomb cultural sites???
In fact, one of the first points made by a Trump defender on the subject, was that there is no reason to believe him.
“So”? What is the logic behind that inference?So clearly if he told Zelensky there was a quid pro quo he was lying
So what’s next? Does anybody know?
I am hoping the aim is empowerment and courage for suppressed Westerners created by the Obama administration. Raising the grain, contrasting, and stirring up with neccesary actions are proving to be superior leadership tools. President Trump’s timing is exact too. There may not be an end to the war on terrorism but Westerners do not and should not take it in silent submission. Now that President Trump has unleashed the shackles…there will be no turning back.To what end?
There is none, because my expectations of those who can’t stand Trump is No logic matters.JonNC:![]()
“So”? What is the logic behind that inference?So clearly if he told Zelensky there was a quid pro quo he was lying
Good. You acknowledge that there is no logic in your statement.There is none
None that progressives would care about. Remember, the attitude of the left toward Trump is completely lacking in logic.JonNC:![]()
Good. You acknowledge that there is no logic in your statement.There is none
I’ll keep an eye out for when you make an actual, fair case for that.Remember, the attitude of the left toward Trump is completely lacking in logic.
You mean like I’ve kept an eye out for evidence of collusion, evidence of a quid pro quo?JonNC:![]()
I’ll keep an eye out for when you make an actual, fair case for that.Remember, the attitude of the left toward Trump is completely lacking in logic.
The evidence of that collusion in the Mueller report. The report is publicly available.You mean like I’ve kept an eye out for evidence of collusion, evidence of a quid pro quo?
Correct. None.The evidence of that collusion in the Mueller report.
None again.The evidence of a quid pro quo is circumstantial but clear form the House testimony.
That response is incompatible with the contents of the report.Correct. None.
That response is incompatible with the contents of the testimony.None again.