Luther, Calvin, and their followers have declared the Pope to be the “Anti-Christ,” and furthermore, that
“… popes, bishops, canons, and monks. God has not instituted these offices.”
Luther,
To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation.
Luther’s Works: The Christian in Society I, James Atkinson, Helmut T. Lehmann, eds., 1966, Fortress Press, vol. 44, p. 176. ISBN 0800603443
amazon.com/Luthers-Works-Christian-Society-I/dp/0800603443
books.google.com/books?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=popes,+bishops,+canons,+and+monks.+God+has+not+instituted+these+offices&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=images&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp&q=%22popes%2C%20bishops%2C%20canons%2C%20and%20monks.%20God%20has%20not%20instituted%20these%20offices%22
Well, there is certainly
nothing new in this kind of rebellious talk against the Pope and the Church.
St. Peter Damian (1007-1072) in his own day had to contend with the monks and townsfolk of Florence, many of whom were saying essentially the same sorts of things about
their prelates! St. Damian writes about such people in his letter 146.
I’ve posted some excerpts below, but first, here is the editor’s introduction to letter 146 (Lent 1067 A.D.):
Peter Damian to the citizens of Florence. Writing from Gamugno, he begs the Florentines to compose their differences with their bishop, Peter, whom they had accused of purchasing his office, and to await a decision upon investigation by the approaching synod in Rome. He repeats many ideas already proposed in his earlier Liber gratissimus (Letter 40), defending the validity of acts performed by a simonist bishop. Assuring his readers that he agrees with their opposition to simony, which for him was heresy, he refuses to condemn the bishop before his day in court. ‘It is more tolerable to excuse a sinner, than to prejudge an innocent man.’ He then takes on the monks of John Gualbertus in the city, who, seemingly in support of Cardinal Humbert’s position, had degenerated into revolutionary action by logically nullifying all the acts of simonist bishops and priests, thereby proscribing all sacrament functions in Florence. He cautions these puritans against excessive righteousness and wisdom, and likens them to the Cathari in their anarchical denial of authority to pope, king, archbishop, or priest.
And now the saintly Damian writes:
To the beloved in Christ, the citizens of Florence, the monk Peter the sinner sends his service of fraternal charity…. - P. 155
… when anyone attacks and disparages priests, he thereby also condemns their sacraments, something also that blessed Jude the apostle observes in his epistle when of blasphemers. For in first referring to those who flout authority and insult celestial beings, he then remarked, “When the archangel Michael was in debate with the devil, disputing the possession of Moses’ body, he did not presume to condemn him in insulting words, but said: ‘May the Lord rebuke you.’ (Jd 1:9) Therefore, if the highest angel did not presume to pass judgment and condemn the devil, how is it that man is not afraid to ridicule the sacraments that are filled with the power of the Holy Spirit? For since Truth itself say, “if anyone sins against the Holy Spirit, for him there is no forgiveness either in this age or in the age to come, (Matt 12:32) we must gravely fear that such people surely offend him, without whom the outrage of sin can never be remitted. - Pp. 162-63.
But why do I complain of the disparagement of priests and of the sacraments, when almost everything is torn to pieces by them, spat upon in contempt, and put up to public ridicule? "There is no pope,’ the say, ‘no king, and lastly, no bishop or priest." And so it happened, according to report, that nearly a thousand people were deceived by this trumpery and nonsense, and left this world without receiving the sacrament of the Body and Blood of the Lord. In fact, they are convinced that no true sacraments can be administered by contemporary priest.
There are many churches, moreover, where they consider it not only improper for them to enter, but where they judge them unworthy of paying them their respect. For they disdain to pay honor to churches dedicated by bishops who for some reason they considered unworthy. Indeed, as Luke relates, ‘Paul said, “I appeal to Caesar!’’ To whom Festus replied, “You have appealed to Caesar: to Caesar you shall go.’ (Acts 25:11-12) Is the pope a greater criminal than Nero? Are we to believe that these monks are holier than Paul?
But since Paul, who had previously been caught up to the third heaven, (cf. 2 Cor. 12:2) did not refuse to appear before Nero, what monk can be so proud of his holiness that he dare condemn the decision of the Apostolic See, where, to be sure, attention is paid, not a man’s deserts, but to the regulations governing ecclesiastical office? These monks reach their decision on street corners, and defame the jurisdiction of synods. They pass judgment on monks, disparage everything that smacks of clerics, and are careful not to offend laymen who, indeed, deserve to be more sharply and bitterly censured. Should they see a monk approaching, they will say, "Look, here comes one of those scapulars.” -p. 163.
The Letters of Peter Damian, 121-150 (Fathers of the Church, Medieval Continuation), Owen J. Blum O.F.M., tr., 2004, ISBN 081321372X
amazon.com/Letters-121-150-Fathers-Medieval-Continuation/dp/081321372X
“Furthermore,
the Catholic Church alone is the body of Christ, of which He is the Head and Saviour of His body. Ephesians 5:23 Outside this body the Holy Spirit gives life to no one seeing that, as the apostle says himself, ‘The love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us;’ Romans 5:5 but
he is not a partaker of the divine love who is the enemy of unity. Therefore they have not the Holy Ghost who are outside the Church; for it is written of them, ‘They separate themselves
being sensual, having not the Spirit.’" Jude 19
St. Augustine, letter 185:50
newadvent.org/fathers/1102185.htm