We need some Jews here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2ndGen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
us being much more centered on ‘correctness’ of activity

Jews always say that but I’ve seen no evidence that Jews are any more well-behaved than Christians in terms of charity, sobriety, chastity, etc. And a lot of Jews don’t observe any Torah.

So it seems not to be a matter of action over belief, but rather simply difference of belief in that God isn’t as important to Jews as God is to Christians.
That’s not what they mean, Judaism is a religion of the law, it generally does not make demands on the subjective thoughts and emotions of Jews.

Hence we are a religion of Beleif, and they are a religion of Right Action.

Or that is the impression I get from Jewish writters, I have never been able to study it as much as I’d like to, it’s a very interesting religion, much more that Islam in my oppinion(no offense to Muslims), however it is often portrayed as, as a Jew here said, Christainity minus Jesus, which is unfortunate.
 
That’s not what they mean, Judaism is a religion of the law, it generally does not make demands on the subjective thoughts and emotions of Jews.

Hence we are a religion of Beleif, and they are a religion of Right Action.
Unless Jews want to accept Jesus and stay in Judaism. Then are demanded to ditch Jesus or get out. Really the only requirement in Judaism is believing that Jesus is wrong, otherwise they say even an atheist Jew can practice good Judaism.

So I’m not sure about all that.
 
Unless Jews want to accept Jesus and stay in Judaism. Then are demanded to ditch Jesus or get out. Really the only requirement in Judaism is believing that Jesus is wrong, otherwise they say even an atheist Jew can practice good Judaism.

So I’m not sure about all that.
I don’t see your point, however I got the impression of a good deal of ignorance and biggotry.
 
I don’t see your point, however I got the impression of a good deal of ignorance and biggotry.
You said “Hence we are a religion of Beleif, and they are a religion of Right Action.”

Does that mean they are acting right to reject Jesus?
 
You said “Hence we are a religion of Beleif, and they are a religion of Right Action.”

Does that mean they are acting right to reject Jesus?
Well according to our (meaning Christian) outlook yes rejecting Jesus is bad. However, we talking about how the religion views itself. While Christianity endorses right action we are primarily a religion of Faith. So have a different focus when we look at our relationship to God than would a Jew.

They focus on right action (though certainly faith is present as well) so to them (and any of the Jewish members correct me if I’m wrong) the actions and ethics of the Torah are what is in focus. If you’re going to understand a person’s religion one must try to view it through their lens and language.

How often do we complain about Protestants completely getting our beliefs wrong because they refuse to view us through our lens. Lets not do the same to our Jewish members.
 
For just a smidgen of understanding about some of the differences between Judaism and Christianity from at least one scholarly Jewish perspective, you might want to watch the following free streaming video of a lecture from 2001 by Dr. Amy-Jill Levine, Carpenter Professor of New Testament Studies at Vanderbilt University Divinity School, who is also a Conservative Jew. The title is “Reassessing Jewish-Christian Relations: Scripture, Polemic, and Salvation”. She is a very enjoyable speaker and I found the video thought-provoking. It’s 58 minutes long.

burkelecture.ucsd.edu/past/levine.html
 
They focus on right action (though certainly faith is present as well) so to them (and any of the Jewish members correct me if I’m wrong) the actions and ethics of the Torah are what is in focus. If you’re going to understand a person’s religion one must try to view it through their lens and language.

How often do we complain about Protestants completely getting our beliefs wrong because they refuse to view us through our lens. Lets not do the same to our Jewish members.
It has seemed to me that a lot of Jews are atheists, from a Christian perspective. But hearing what I am hearing from Jews on here, I’m not sure that perspective is sufficient for understanding. I’m getting the impression that some significant number of Jews (understanding there are variatinos) have something almost like a “Masonic” notion of God; that a Supreme Being exists, or likely exists, or possibly exists but that we can’t know a great deal about that Being; that it’s pointless to try to know it, and that there isn’t a personal sort of relationship with that Being. It’s more like God-as-principle. Am I close here?

I recall debating with a Jew once about whether it made any sense to be ethical or moral if there is no afterlife. The Jew, who didn’t believe there is, was very big into acting morally simply because it was rational to have a society in which the good of all is sought. That made zero sense to me, because, in the absence of a judge in the matter, my notion of what’s good for mankind is just as valid as anyone else’s, no matter how destructive my actions might really be. On the other hand, I could tell he thought I was kind of a barbarian for “requiring” an afterlife in order to be moral. There was just no place where our thinking processes met. Oh, and he kept kosher too, which I could understand from a cultural standpoint, but not otherwise.

From a Christian perspective, some of the things Jesus says in the Bible about a relationship between God and man seem obvious. But perhaps they only seem obvious because the Christian believes in them. Thinking of God in terms of a loving Father did not not seem obvious from the perspective of the Jews in the gospel, or Jesus would not have talked about it at all. I get the impression that must have been a radical thing to say at the time and in that place.

I have a great deal of respect for Jews in general, though they can be just as bad or good as anyone. I will say, though, that most of them I know are very polite, but in a way that I think they’re always wary that I will turn into a loutish “goy” in front of their eyes, like the wolfman in the light of the full moon. I can understand how Jews could feel the need to be just a bit wary of Christians.

Finally, it would be a great mistake for anyone to assume there are not huge numbers of thorougly secular Muslims. Going only by those I know and have known, I would say that’s the great majority.
 
:confused:
I think that’s a bit of a cop out the entire religion is centered around the belief that Jews are better than the gentiles. It is so ingrained in your religion that you can’t seperate it now. This is why Jews were so hated, wherever they went they would not integrate, they would not talk to, eat with, allow their daughters to marry any of the people whose country they were living in. In plain speak they simply thought they were much better and God prefered them, they thought gentiles were dogs and filthy. They were the first supremicists. It’s not hard to imagine why this drew such drastic overreactions. Community is nececssary for surrvival, if one group places themselves above the community, people (especially people who see through the eyes of a superstitious villager) will view them with much suspicion.

And this goes on today when I lived in Brooklyn I walked through Borough park into a Motherhood Maternity and the saleswomen would not even acknowledge my wifes existence as she spoke to them. Living upstate now near Kuris Joel they are equally unfriendly and seperatists. And guess what people don’t like them, not because they’re Jews, but because they are incredibly unfriendly. They’re unfriendly because that is what their religion calls for, we are mere dogs to them, and beneath even talking to.
Thank you for your interesting explanation on antisemitism as being rooted in the “Jewish belief” that they are superiour to all other people and therefore refuse to integrate with them. Your take on antisemitism has the double benifit of making it the Jews own fault and its Jewish victims as merely getting their just reward.

I will not argue with you if the belief that there is only one true religion, that all people who do not adhere to the one true religion are blind and lost and that they bear consequences for not adopting the beliefs of the one true religion is “supremacist”. However I believe there can be no argument that those beliefs are called Catholicism. Such beliefs have nothing to do with Judaism.

On the contrary, Judaism believes that it is easier for the gentile to get to the world to come then for the Jew as the gentile has only to follow the seven noahide commandments.

There are indeed a group of laws and philisophical works referring to people of another religion as animals fit for slaughter, forbidding any and all social integration with them even sharing a meal, holding these people cursed and holding that any contact with them will lead to moral decrepitude. According to these laws and works these cursed people are forbidden to work for you and you are forbidden to work for them, the cursed people are allowed only to live in seperate areas away from good and moral people and if they leave their special area they must wear a special mark on their clothing so that they may be easily identified as belonging to the cursed group. Marriage to one of the cursed people or conversion to their religion is a capital offense. These are Catholic Church Papal laws and the cursed group is the Jews. Jews did indeed live a totally autonomous existence in feudal Catholic europe for the simple reason that there was absoulutely no place for the Jew in that society.

Things changed with Napolean and the age of enlightenment in the 19th Century. For the first time in history Jews were allowed to to be citizens in the countries where they lived and to begin to integrate into general society. The changes this brought about to Jews and Judaisim is the reason for the development of Jewish movements like reform Judaisim and conservative Judaism but that deserves a seperate post.

Indeed despite continuing restrictions limiting the number of Jews to institutions of higher learning Jewish contributions to all aspects of human knowledge invention and creativity since being allowed to be part of general society has been completely disporpotional to the fact that we make up a mere one quarter of one per cent of the population. Do I believe that many Jews have shown themselves to be talented and intelligent? Yes. Do I believe that all groups of people contain talented and intelligent people? Yes. Do I believe in Catholicism? No. Do I desire my children to be Jews and carry on my religion and culture? Yes.
 
On the contrary, Judaism believes that it is easier for the gentile to get to the world to come then for the Jew as the gentile has only to follow the seven noahide commandments.
But if Jews believe that the New Covenant is only for Jews and not Gentiles too, then Gentiles won’t have God’s Laws written on their hearts and won’t sin anymore. While Christians believe that the New Covenant is for everyone who accepts it, Jews and Gentiles.

So isn’t the Jewish New Covenant view worse for everyone since Gentiles would still be able to sin without God’s Laws written on their hearts too?
 
There are indeed a group of laws and philisophical works referring to people of another religion as animals fit for slaughter,
I’m sure the rest of the what you’ve said is accurate, but I find this hard to believe. The Church has always held that Jews are capable of receiving the gospel. I’d be interested in seeing where the Church ever referred to Jews as “animals fit for slaughter”.
 
I’m sure the rest of the what you’ve said is accurate, but I find this hard to believe. The Church has always held that Jews are capable of receiving the gospel. I’d be interested in seeing where the Church ever referred to Jews as “animals fit for slaughter”.
“Jews had no status in medieval Europe?”

:rotfl:

You’re a self-hating Goy, Dauphin, if you buy this screed.

chosen people, your ignorance–not to mention your bigotry–is what Ashkenazis would call a “Schande far die Goyim”. It makes Jews look bad in front of the Gentiles.

From wikipedia:
However, during Henry’s reign (1100–1135) a royal charter was granted to Joseph, the chief rabbi of London, and all his followers. Under this charter, Jews were permitted to move about the country without paying tolls, to buy and sell goods and property, to sell their pledges after holding them a year and a day, to be tried by their peers, and to be sworn on the Torah rather than on a Christian Bible. Special weight was attributed to a Jew’s oath, which was valid against that of 12 Christians, because they represented the King of England in financial matters. The sixth clause of the charter was specially important: it granted to the Jews the right of movement throughout the kingdom, as if these were the king’s own property (sicut res propriæ nostræ)
Now the Latin is badly translated (it actually means “were of our (the king’s) own substance”), but that looks like a status to me. Higher than Christians in some ways.

*That’s *actually where the resentment came in–that and the fact they could perform usury.

Those that do not learn history have no right to opinions about it.
 
“Jews had no status in medieval Europe?”

:rotfl:

You’re a self-hating Goy, Dauphin, if you buy this screed.
I don’t think so. I haven’t confirmed most of what he said, but I am very much aware of some of the provisions of the Fourth Lateran Council, which I studied recently.

It forced Jews and Muslims to wear special dress, and prohibited Jews from holding public office.

Lateran IV was a pivotal council of the church, which introduced the beautiful dogmatic definitions of Transubstantiation and extra ecclesiam nulla salus, but I believe it erred in this non-dogmatic matter.
 
Those that do not learn history have no right to opinions about it.
Those quoting little bits of the 12th Century while missing out on the rather more significant “What happened next . . . .” might be a little more careful in the use of declamatory style and advice to others.

Oh dear, probably should get back to my elevated status and usury in case the goyim find themselves letting up on the resentment.
 
You said “Hence we are a religion of Beleif, and they are a religion of Right Action.”

Does that mean they are acting right to reject Jesus?
Rejecting Jesus in Judaism is a belief, not an action. Asking if we are right is ridiculous. Are mulsims right in accepting Mohammed as a prophet? Are Christians right in accepting Jesus as God? Or are only people who adopt your position when it comes to theology “right”?
 
It has seemed to me that a lot of Jews are atheists, from a Christian perspective. But hearing what I am hearing from Jews on here, I’m not sure that perspective is sufficient for understanding. I’m getting the impression that some significant number of Jews (understanding there are variatinos) have something almost like a “Masonic” notion of God; that a Supreme Being exists, or likely exists, or possibly exists but that we can’t know a great deal about that Being; that it’s pointless to try to know it, and that there isn’t a personal sort of relationship with that Being. It’s more like God-as-principle. Am I close here?
Here is the thing. We believe in a monotheistic God that defies definition to such an extent that we don’t and can’t even name Him. So how are we supposed to fit such a belief into one workable definition? To do so would be to limit God. So since we are in effect worshipping a God that defies human conception, but not apprehnsion, it does little good to swap definitions of what each jew believes is the ineffable (mystery) of GOd.

I
 
Here is the thing. We believe in a monotheistic God that defies definition to such an extent that we don’t and can’t even name Him. So how are we supposed to fit such a belief into one workable definition? To do so would be to limit God. So since we are in effect worshipping a God that defies human conception, but not apprehnsion, it does little good to swap definitions of what each jew believes is the ineffable (mystery) of GOd.

I
Wouldn’t omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent be a good start? And I was always under the impression that God’s name is “I AM”, in that He is the very essence of existence, the being upon which the existence of all things is contingent.

As St. Thomas Aquinas said, “God exists” is necessarily true, since in that statement, subject and predicate are the same!
 
I recall debating with a Jew once about whether it made any sense to be ethical or moral if there is no afterlife. The Jew, who didn’t believe there is, was very big into acting morally simply because it was rational to have a society in which the good of all is sought. That made zero sense to me, because, in the absence of a judge in the matter, my notion of what’s good for mankind is just as valid as anyone else’s, no matter how destructive my actions might really be. On the other hand, I could tell he thought I was kind of a barbarian for “requiring” an afterlife in order to be moral. There was just no place where our thinking processes met. Oh, and he kept kosher too, which I could understand from a cultural standpoint, but not otherwise.
I’d agree that ethical and moral behavior has an ultimate Judge upon which it is founded upon. This is a basic belief of Judaism and the person who tried to justify such a belief system with God (definition pending), was rejecting a basic tenent of Judaism. One of the reasons we have the entire book of Genesis and most of Exodus before receiving Torah, is that our laws are not simply given out of thin air with no explanation. Every law/commandment is based on and part of a historical story. The laws are given in context. There’s a reason for this.
 
But if Jews believe that the New Covenant is only for Jews and not Gentiles too, then Gentiles won’t have God’s Laws written on their hearts and won’t sin anymore. While Christians believe that the New Covenant is for everyone who accepts it, Jews and Gentiles.

So isn’t the Jewish New Covenant view worse for everyone since Gentiles would still be able to sin without God’s Laws written on their hearts too?
No. First of all, there is nothing in Christianity that I’m aware of which says people will sin no more in this world. So the Jewish interpetation of a circumcised heart can’t be “worse” than the Christian or your interpetation. Second, because our interpetation would be a blessing to the Jewish people, as we’d keep the commandments joyfully, that doesn’t mean it won’t be a blessing for everyone. There’s nothing stopping one from believing that the Noahide Covenant/laws will also be kept by the rest of the world in Joy. And since they don’t have to observe the other commandments, they wouldn’t be sinning any more or less than the rest of this.
 
I’m sure the rest of the what you’ve said is accurate, but I find this hard to believe. The Church has always held that Jews are capable of receiving the gospel. I’d be interested in seeing where the Church ever referred to Jews as “animals fit for slaughter”.
He’s probably referring to Saint John Chrysostom. Personally, I wish Chosen People would simply ignore Lukewarm, who seems intent on baiting Jews here and elsewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top