There’s two sides in every conflict, yet the people in it only really ever have access to one. When there’s no mediator, how do you decide?
If you asked my mother, she’d say I don’t care enough about my family, I’m rebellious, I don’t listen to her or respect her, and I don’t take care of myself.
If you asked me, I’d say my mother still expects perfect obedience, thinks being my mother means she can speak to me however she wants, and ascribes the worst possible motives to my actions.
There’s no one I can go to that knows both of us and that everyone would trust as a fair mediator. How do you tell when you’re being fair to the other party?
It is up to you to form your conscience and follow it, and up to her to form hers and follow hers.
It is entirely possible, by the way, that both of you have valid complaints and both of you are hiding behind defensiveness (counter-attacking) and excuses in order to resist the amendment you each need to do.
For instance, it is possible that you have a vicious cycle going on, one in which one of you gets peeved at the other, resulting in her being harsh with you and you resisting her harshness by withholding obedience. It may be that you are both far more concerned with your own hurt feelings than you are that you are committing offenses against the other one, or that you are both use your hurt feelings as an excuse for offensive and unacceptable behavior towards the other. That is the most common middle ground, not a sure thing but still a bit more likely than the possibility that you are a total brat with a saint of a mother or that she is an overbearing unrealistic tyrant with a beaten puppy for a daughter. All three are possible. In any case, the soul that is yours to worry about is yours. Concern yourself with examining your own conscience. Once you do that, you can let go of inappropriate guilt trips coming from your mother, and act solely on the guilt that hits a true mark.
My rule of marriage is this: If you are wrong, then apologize, even if you are not the most wrong. This will not always result in a counter-apology, and you ought not expect one. Still, it has these these features going for it: 1) very often the person most in the wrong has the hardest time apologizing, but will almost anyone, whether more or less wrong, will find apologizing easier when some of the blame for a round of hard feelings is shared by someone else and 2) if you use the bad behavior of others as an excuse for your own bad behavior, then you are setting yourself up to be one of the worst-behaved people others know, rather than the best-behaved and 3) to bear the wrongs of others patiently is a spiritual work of mercy, and one way to do that is to apologize when you have wronged someone who also owes you an apology, but isn’t giving one. The most admirable people stick to their admirable behavior even when others give them an excuse or a mighty temptation not to.
*You have heard that it was said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your heavenly Father, for he makes his sun rise on the bad and the good, and causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what recompense will you have? Do not the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet your brothers only, what is unusual about that? Do not the pagans do the same? So be perfect, just as your heavenly Father is perfect. *
Matt. 5:43-48
It is far easier to love an enemy you never see in person than to be loving and patient with a relative who seems to be using all of his or her knowledge of your red buttons to drive you over the edge!
