Odd thought halfway through “Codependent no more” - I feel almost like I’m reading about my mother. I know that’s not the point, and I swear I didn’t go into it looking for her. But it makes almost too much sense. Like she still wants the sick little girl who needed her…
Let’s look at one short definition Melody Beattie uses for co-dependence:
“A codependent person is one who has let another person’s behavior affect him or her, and who is obsessed with controlling that person’s behavior.”
IOW, the dependent person behaving in a self-destructive way, and the co-dependent has a life that revolves around compensating for those destructive behaviors by prevention or damage control. The co-dependent is controlling out of misguided effort at self-preservation and preservation of the person who is destroying his or her life, relationships, and future through dependence on drugs or alcohol.
Books like “Co-Dependent No More” are not valuable for everyone because everyone is in a co-dependent relationship. These books are valuable because everyone is tempted to cross the boundary between caring about and controlling those they love. They are useful in helping us get an honest look at what is our business, what is not, and how we ought to respond (rather than react) to those who are crossing into meddling in our business, no matter what the reason.
Mothers and fathers are rightfully needed by their children when their children are young, and the dependence of the child on her parents to make important decisions for her and keep her in safe situations is totally appropriate. The problem comes when parents do not adjust to the appropriate increase in their child’s independence and self-responsibility. An adult is not made in a day, and very few of us would recognize a perfect adult if we saw him or her. (How many of us can say we examine ourselves as Heaven would examine us? Probably those who talk about it don’t do it, and those who do it don’t talk about it.)
Many good parents have trouble making that adjustment, because there is no fat black line that tells a parent when to step in and when to hold back and let the child take his or her own falls. It is one of the great worries of parenthood: “am I being too controlling or am I being too lax? How much responsibility should I give him/her, and how much protection from harm? How much should I or should I not help when things go badly for him/her?” It is also hard for many parents to differentiate their child’s choices from their own success at a parent. Many parents believe that their child is evidence of their success as a parent, as if someone with good parents is incapable of making a poor choice!
This is particularly true for perfectionists of the type who do not think anyone else in the world does things “right.” Why don’t they trust their adult child’s judgment? Easy! Because they don’t trust the judgment of anyone at all, excepting themselves! If your parent is like that and doesn’t trust you, well, they trust you as much as some of the most admirable people either of you know! (You may as well laugh, because otherwise you’ll cry…)
See, most of the time it’s not that she’ll try to talk me out of it. It’s more, if I said I won’t answer the phone between 2 and 4, she’d call at 1:59 every single day.
Children do this all of the time…that is (with apologies to the lawyers reading this), they become little “attorneys” who take every advantage they can find that is within the “letter of the law.” It is one of the temptations of human nature. It is unfortunate, but it is a way to test the “law-giver.” If your mother does this, accept that she does and make your “rules” accordingly. (For instance, “I’m not available to talk to you between 2 and 4 pm,” instead of “Don’t call between 2 pm and 4 pm,” and then if she calls at 1:59, you only allow the call to last 1 minute, then you say “oops, it’s 2 pm! Talk to you another time, Mom! Gotta go! Bye!”)
I’m honestly not sure there is such a thing. Not that I don’t know what it is, but that I’m not sure the possibility exists at all.
Or if there is, I feel like what she wants is an obedient daughter. Our conflicts feel to me less about the actual issue and more about me doing things she dislikes.
The word obedient comes from the Latin, from “ob” meaning “to” and “audire” meaning to “listen” or to “hear.” It may not be reasonable to ask yourself to be obedient in the way that she means the word (because by “listen,” she may mean “agree with what you hear from me, and act according to what I meant, even if that is not what I said”). What you can do, however, is to do your best to listen to her as fully as you can, and try to understand her as well as you can–the words she says, the body language, the timing, what you think she means, how you think she understands the situation. That is a great gift.
To listen to her doesn’t mean you’ll do everything she says. Obedience to God requires that, because God is always right. Your mother, however, is not God. True listening may not be anything like enough to please her. Still, if you do your best to hear what she says and do what you can both to please her and remain true to your own right to autonomy and adult self-determination, you will have done well. You will have given her what you would want your adult child to give you, and you will not go without a reward for that. If she tries to run a guilt trip on you after that, you can take it as you would a faulty smoke detector: an unfortunate annoyance, but nothing to get your fight-or-flight response going. It will take a lot of practice to walk that line and it may never get easy, but I think if you try that, you’ll learn that you can hand your mother’s issues to God each night, ask for forgiveness and care from Heaven for all, and sleep like a baby.