We should eat less to show solidarity with the poor, says cardinal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maranatha
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe you ought to take that to prayers and fasting this lent. If the fasting is not that spiritual it might be that it is done with the wrong attitude.
I do pray and fast during Lent. But doing it with the wrong attitude in my opinion is getting up, dusting off our knees and thinking, “Well, that’s taken care of!”

I think we’re called upon to do more. I note that Catholics, for example, put less per person in the collection plate than any other large Christian religion. Why is that?
 
Typically, in times and places when the bishops were also the societal leaders because they were “clerics” and most Catholics weren’t that “advanced” in societal life. I suppose that takes us right back to your “education” mantra.
Oh, I know why we did things like that. What I doin’t understand is why we stopped!

I mentioned Julian the Apostate’s letter to Arsacius. The opening line is, “The religion of the Greeks does not yet prosper as I would wish, on account of those who profess it.”

That is the context for his comment that “For it is disgraceful when no Jew is a beggar and the impious Galileans [the name given by Julian to Christians] support our poor in addition to their own; everyone is able to see that our coreligionists are in want of aid from us.”

And now we impious Galileans have stopped supporting the poor as we used to – and the religion of the Galileans doesn’t prosper any more, either.
You’re certainly free to do things on your own in union with the Church even absent a bishop. No need to wait.
And I do – but without the impact I and others could have if we worked as a nation-wide team, under the strong leadership of our Bishops.

“The religion of the Galileans does not yet prosper as I would wish, on account of those who lead it.”
 
When we, as Catholics, grew upwardly mobile due to our “education”. Ah, wonderful American Calvinism!
When we were a poor, dispised and discriminated-against minority, we accomplished miracles. Now we are above the National average for income (that is, non-Hispanic Catholics are) and we want to have the government do it all under the rubric “social justice” (but we’ll sit on the couch and mutter approval while someone else advances the ball.)

That’s why we need leadership from the Bishops – to remind us we’re still Catholics!
 
That’s why we need leadership from the Bishops – to remind us we’re still Catholics!
That’s why we need fasting, to remind us of our roots. Perhaps we ought to heed the cardinal in question who’s trying to lead us.
 
That’s why we need fasting, to remind us of our roots. Perhaps we ought to heed the cardinal in question who’s trying to lead us.
Oh, I don’t reject fasting and prayer. By no means.

But I ask, “What’s the next step? How will we take the virtues and zeal we achieve through fasting and prayer and work as a Church to help the poor, sick and illiterate?”
 
Oh, I don’t reject fasting and prayer. By no means.

But I ask, “What’s the next step? How will we take the virtues and zeal we achieve through fasting and prayer and work as a Church to help the poor, sick and illiterate?”
Well, you’ll have to rely on the Holy Spirit, and use your gifts for being able to discern what actions have good intention but ineffective, and what is right and will bear good fruit.
 
Well, you’ll have to rely on the Holy Spirit, and use your gifts for being able to discern what actions have good intention but ineffective, and what is right and will bear good fruit.
In other words, we no longer have a right under canon law to pastoral leadership?
 
In other words, we no longer have a right under canon law to pastoral leadership?
What does using individual discernment as to the Lord’s call have to do with canonical rights? The two are in no way opposed. I feel for you not having a bishop in place, vern, but everything is not ultimately about just following in lockstep behind some sort of episcopal marshalling.
 
What does using individual discernment as to the Lord’s call have to do with canonical rights? The two are in no way opposed. I feel for you not having a bishop in place, vern, but everything is not ultimately about just following in lockstep behind some sort of episcopal marshalling.
Making excuses for poor leadership has apparently become a cottage industry in this country.
 
Making excuses for poor leadership has apparently become a cottage industry in this country.
So lead us, vern. As has been stated here previously, bishops usually aren’t very good leaders. Why beat your head against the wall hoping they will be, when we could better expend that energy finding positive outlets as best as possible?
 
So lead us, vern.
As an old solder, I do a bit to lead.

But while we’re in this vein, remember what Hollingsworth said, “Show me a man who thinks he can, by merely exercising his magnetic personality, get another man to do something he doesn’t want to do and may very well get him killed, and I will show you a d***** f****.”

Let me rephrase it like this, “Show me a man who is trying to lead without authority, and I will show a man who – be he ever so talented and energetic – will have only a fraction of the effect he could have.”
As has been stated here previously, bishops usually aren’t very good leaders.
True, but leaders may be made as well as born.
Why beat your head against the wall hoping they will be, when we could better expend that energy finding positive outlets as best as possible?
Actually, what I do accomplishes a bit – what I could do if the Bishop would merely endorse it would be a great deal more.
 
Find a cause, however small it might be. And start moving if forward from your own living room. Often you don’t even need to expend any money.

Use the Karl Keating model.
 
Oh, I’m well beyond the money stage – I’ve started a program to raise money for Right to Life, and we’re now in a position where we need a plan to spend the money – a plan that is well in hand, of course.

And that’s just one of several projects.

The problem is, this approach is personality-dependent, and that means it has no legs. If the next parish doesn’t have a self-starter, they won’t get started. With the support and leadership of a Bishop, we could have all sorts of highly-effective projects in every parish.
 
Vern- Most Bishops are better beaurocrats than leaders! I work in prison and when the Cardinal (whom I have known for years while working in a Ministry position of the Church here) came for a visit to say Mass, the line to shake my hand (because I am a female and this opportunity to have contact is rare and exciting to them) was as long as the one to shake the Cardinals!
What works is when we follow God’s plan for us, and give up our own ambitions for His. Both the Cardinal and I were presnt in there doing just that, and I’m sure you will acknowlege that we upheld one another, because it reinforces our cause for God. The Cardinal or Bishop is just one man, and without laypersons who understand God’s plan, he doesn’t have the time, energy or sometimes, the expertice, to get the job done. As the BODY OF CHRIST, we are all liable for what happens, which is why solidarity is neccessary, always. Even Jesus didn’t do things alone, and the early Christians from whom you like to quote were close-knit communities. The gospel of 1/21 is perfect understand how necessary each member is. No one thing stands out but God*, as it is in heaven, *where we will live this out in eternity.

BTW- There are many things to fast from besides food.
 
The problem is, this approach is personality-dependent, and that means it has no legs. If the next parish doesn’t have a self-starter, they won’t get started. With the support and leadership of a Bishop, we could have all sorts of highly-effective projects in every parish.
Even with the support of a bishop, it would still be reliant upon the self starting efforts of personalities in parishes. It’s always that way, no matter how much “the bishops wants” something.
 
Even with the support of a bishop, it would still be reliant upon the self starting efforts of personalities in parishes. It’s always that way, no matter how much “the bishops wants” something.
If that were true, leadership wouldn’t work in Armies, either.

But it does. One good man at the top can make more difference than a thousand below him.
 
If that were true, leadership wouldn’t work in Armies, either.

But it does. One good man at the top can make more difference than a thousand below him.
Bad analogy. The Church doesn’t operate like a military institution. It just ain’t set up that way.
 
Bad analogy. The Church doesn’t operate like a military institution. It just ain’t set up that way.
Actually it’s a very good analogy – the Church Militant resembles an army in many ways. While it doesn’t have tanks and artillery, it does have a formal, authoritarian, herarchical structure, a formal doctrine, and a real mission.

It is those matters that make the analogy so good – and for proof, look at how John Paul II affected the Church with his leadership. Go from diocese to diocese – and you will see the “best” dioceses, those with more priests, more seminarians, more vibrant parishes, are the ones with bishops who lead, influence, and inspire.
 
Actually it’s a very good analogy – the Church Militant resembles an army in many ways. While it doesn’t have tanks and artillery, it does have a formal, authoritarian, herarchical structure, a formal doctrine, and a real mission.

It is those matters that make the analogy so good – and for proof, look at how John Paul II affected the Church with his leadership. Go from diocese to diocese – and you will see the “best” dioceses, those with more priests, more seminarians, more vibrant parishes, are the ones with bishops who lead, influence, and inspire.
Certainly a bishop can “lead, influence, and inspire”. But that can’t effectively command. Ultimately, it is up to us to respond. In a sense, then, while the Church has a central core of the faith in the episcopate, it is more functionally a bottom-up organization, dependant upon the vast multitude of faithful for it’s success perhaps to a greater degree than the bishops can accomplish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top