C
CilladeRoma
Guest
A one-hour drive is not an unreasonable distance.All we are asking is a valid EF mass that is within a reasonable distance.
A one-hour drive is not an unreasonable distance.All we are asking is a valid EF mass that is within a reasonable distance.
Yah. I guess this could be okay.You have an EF Mass, sponsored by your diocese, about an hour away.
Why not get your 11 people to carpool there a couple of times a month, and work with that congregation, to bring one closer. I am sure many of the people who already attend drive quite a distance.
Yes, if it is at an actual RCC church and not a schismatic one.If we go to the EF mass on Sunday does that fulfill our obligation
The Church is not a business and our clergy were not ordained to think like salesmen or accountants.Exactly. To the pastor, and the bishop, if it doesn’t make sense in dollars and cents, then it makes no sense at all.
I can understand not all Catholics having a particular interest in, attraction to, or appreciation for the EF. But how could it not be good for all Catholics?He might think his parish isn’t ready for that.
It’s a reasonable position to take. I like the Latin Mass myself, but I don’t think it’s universally good for all Catholics, nor do I think it needs to be promoted or explained to all Catholics.
What is being asked of this priest? He is being asked to keep the heat and lights on for an additional hour or so each week. Is that really putting anyone out?And having a Mass “open to all” doesn’t mean much if only a dozen people show up and the pastor is thinking “for a dozen people you want me to do this?”
From what I understand, the bishops in our diocese over the years have managed to keep the SSPX OUT of our cities and towns. We have some fairly big cities in the diocese, but Chicago is not in our diocese.The FSSP has a Church about 2 and a half hours away. The ICKSP has one about 3 and a half hours away. Typically the SSPX has a chapel less than 20 minutes away.
I don’t think anyone ever questioned whether the EF/TLM was a valid celebration of the Mass, i.e., that the Body and Blood of Christ were confected. Many questioned the liceity, i.e., “are we allowed to do this?”. There was a school of thought among more conservative Catholics in the 1970s and early 1980s along the lines of “Rome has mandated this new form of the Mass, and we need to trust that this was the work of the Holy Spirit, put the old rite behind us, and concentrate on making this new form as reverent and as close to the rubrics as possible”. In other words, God wants us to love and embrace the “new Mass”. This school of thought can be found, among other places, in the book The Pope, The Council, and the Mass (Likoudis/Whitehead).We all know that the EF is the lesser used form. We know that it appeals to a select group of the faithful - for reasons both good and some not so good. (mostly good, due to its natural beauty). It was not clear - repeat: not perfectly clear over several decades - that it was still valid and legitimate.
It happens at a fair few week day Masses at Catholic churches in England. If something is spiritually beneficial for the people then that makes it worthwhile. The cost of lighting and heating (in the winter) for a hour isn’t exactly going to see a parish go broke.Unless you are all pretty well-off financially, a Mass for eleven people can’t happen often
While this is true, there are other factors that are involved. A priest may say the EF in private, whenever he so desires. Public Masses need to be approved.any priest may celebrate the EF/TLM at his discretion.
Should he, considering the Pope has allowed them to hear confessions among other things?the bishop has had no success in driving the SSPX out of his diocese,
Some people are really turned off by Latin Mass for a variety of reasons. Since Latin Mass is currently an “extraordinary” option, there’s no reason to force knowledge of it on people who don’t care for it.But how could it not be good for all Catholics?
Okay, but being turned off isn’t the same as something not being good for us. I doubt we’d be comfortable with anyone saying the OF isn’t “good” for us, because of course any valid Mass is always good for us. My understanding is that no one would be forced to attend the EF Mass the OP is asking for, but it could be a good opportunity to expose people to an option they may not even realize exists.gracepoole:![]()
Some people are really turned off by Latin Mass for a variety of reasons. Since Latin Mass is currently an “extraordinary” option, there’s no reason to force knowledge of it on people who don’t care for it.But how could it not be good for all Catholics?
I wouldn’t call it forced but there may be situations where the EF is your only viable option. Or an OF in another language, for that matter.My understanding is that no one would be forced to attend the EF Mass