R
Randy_Carson
Guest
Would you say that this “mere Christianity” of which you speak the kerygma upon which catechesis is built?Here’s the post I referred to earlier.
Would you say that this “mere Christianity” of which you speak the kerygma upon which catechesis is built?Here’s the post I referred to earlier.
Thought it was me. Was I number two?Tim was the single person most responsible for catalyzing my intellectual/aesthetic interest in Catholicism into an active interest in converting. I do owe it to him to let him know that I finally did it.
Edwin
Maybe. I’d say that it consists of the doctrines that Catholics would regard as principal within the “hierarchy of truths”–the ancient doctrines found in the Creeds, which are accepted by East and West and were not rejected by most of the mainstream Protestant Reformers.Would you say that this “mere Christianity” of which you speak the kerygma upon which catechesis is built?
Very good answer!Maybe. I’d say that it consists of the doctrines that Catholics would regard as principal within the “hierarchy of truths”–the ancient doctrines found in the Creeds, which are accepted by East and West and were not rejected by most of the mainstream Protestant Reformers.
Of course, Protestants vary widely in how much of the Deposit of Faith they hold on to. That’s why “mere Christianity” is rather nebulous, and particularly unhelpful on controversial points.
Edwin
Edwin, I read through the link above where you mention that you are liberal on women’s ordination but conservative on gay marraige, I then went to your blog to see if you’ve written anything in these areas. I found one writing on gay marraige but nothing on women’s ordination. Is there a women’s ordination writing on your blog that I’m not finding?Here’s the post I referred to earlier.
I have meant to write something for a while. Now that I’m Catholic, the difficulties of rightly expressing my view have only increased, so I had almost given up on the idea.Edwin, I read through the link above where you mention that you are liberal on women’s ordination but conservative on gay marraige, I then went to your blog to see if you’ve written anything in these areas. I found one writing on gay marraige but nothing on women’s ordination. Is there a women’s ordination writing on your blog that I’m not finding?
This is humble and prudent.I am never going to contradict firmly something proposed by the Church to be firmly held, as the male-only priesthood is. My own private theological judgment is that the arguments against women’s ordination aren’t very convincing.
The answer is, if God wanted to make woman priest he would have made Mary one.This is humble and prudent.
“Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt, for a man may be annoyed that he cannot work out a mathematical problem, without doubting that it admits an answer.”–Cardinal Newman
Like you’re a college student in a Calc 3 class. You know the professor has the right answer. You just can’t get it. So it’s your job to wrestle with the problem…until you come to the same answer as the professor.
And any answer speculating about what God would have done is pretty certain to be a really bad one.The answer is, if God wanted to make woman priest he would have made Mary one.![]()
I hear that. I haven’t even attempted to write anything for my blog (which oddly enough is called Mere Catholicism) in years.I find it much easier to respond impromptu to other people’s posts than to write something semi-permanent on a “blank sheet of paper” as it were.
Edwin
I’m a conservative – on this issue and in general – but I’ll readily admit that sometimes I feel sabotaged (as it were) by some of my fellow conservatives. Like referring to women’s ordination as “laying hands on hairspray”.My own private theological judgment is that the arguments against women’s ordination aren’t very convincing.
Well perhaps with time this will become easier. Sometimes we have to chose our words carefully, and in the right time & season.I have meant to write something for a while. Now that I’m Catholic, the difficulties of rightly expressing my view have only increased
I like this answer.This is humble and prudent.
“Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt, for a man may be annoyed that he cannot work out a mathematical problem, without doubting that it admits an answer.”–Cardinal Newman
Like you’re a college student in a Calc 3 class. You know the professor has the right answer. You just can’t get it. So it’s your job to wrestle with the problem…until you come to the same answer as the professor.
In my high school math class our teacher was anxious one day to prove to the class that through mathematical equations 1 can equal 0. He tried and tried to write it on the blackboard in front of the whole class and became exasperated when he could not make it work. When he finally gave up one of the top students in the class offered a suggestion and sure enough it solved the problem and now 1 was indeed shown to equal 0 by mathematical processing. Then the teacher got angry with the brilliant student. That was 1967 and I have never forgotten that experience!This is humble and prudent.
“Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt, for a man may be annoyed that he cannot work out a mathematical problem, without doubting that it admits an answer.”–Cardinal Newman
Like you’re a college student in a Calc 3 class. You know the professor has the right answer. You just can’t get it. So it’s your job to wrestle with the problem…until you come to the same answer as the professor.
I have now read through most of your blogs and have an appreciation for your viewpoint on most things.I believe I shared this earlier in the thread. You will find a number of posts on my blog that reflect my thinking over the years–this one, posted right after the other one, is my take on Protestant history written originally for Christianity Today (they never published it).
I’m working on another post now called “How Mere Christianity Made Me a Catholic.” I’ll link to it when I have it up.
Are you making an analogy that sometimes the apostles need to tweak what the Master says?In my high school math class our teacher was anxious one day to prove to the class that through mathematical equations 1 can equal 0. He tried and tried to write it on the blackboard in front of the whole class and became exasperated when he could not make it work. When he finally gave up one of the top students in the class offered a suggestion and sure enough it solved the problem and now 1 was indeed shown to equal 0 by mathematical processing. Then the teacher got angry with the brilliant student. That was 1967 and I have never forgotten that experience!
I never meant to make an analogy about anything. I just was reminded of this experience when I read your post.Are you making an analogy that sometimes the apostles need to tweak what the Master says?
Okey dokey.I never meant to make an analogy about anything. I just was reminded of this experience when I read your post.
Honestly, I do not.Okey dokey.
So do you, as a non-Catholic Christian, understand the analogy that Cardinal Newman made?