A
AlNg
Guest
Suppose a Roman Catholic, with full knowledge and full consent, commits one mortal sin and does not repent before death. Will he still be able to go to heaven?one mortal sin does not have to send you to Hell though
Suppose a Roman Catholic, with full knowledge and full consent, commits one mortal sin and does not repent before death. Will he still be able to go to heaven?one mortal sin does not have to send you to Hell though
EO and EC both have a “conflicted” relationship with the subject. The distinction isn’t recognized, even denied–but, nonetheless, prominent theologians have written entire volumes about it . . .JohnLawson:![]()
I’d never have guessed EO Bishops would allow that, wow. That is actually very interesting.We do have mortal and venial sin
Its very encouraging though. It made my day a lot better to be honest.For that matter, this is the first instance I’ve heard of swimming from WO to RC; it’s largely the other direction, and sometimes Protestants, too.
One way another, whether directly for fairly quilt thereafter. But if WRO isn’t recognized, there’s no canon law support for it as a base . . . but all in all, it makes little difference, as he could trivially change rite to latin.Perhaps problem will be with perception of people but canon law is clearly on his side of becoming Latin Catholic.
I’ve never seen it denounced as heresy (which doesn’t mean it isn’t common). It’s just, AFAIK, that the distinction isn’t recognized.And about mortal and venial sins… I’d call out unnecessary anti-Latin attitude as main reason for denouncing it as heresy anyway.
wait wait wait, you got rebaptized? That’s contrary to Nicene Creed, and therefore contrary to faith. Kinda sacrilegious from Russian Orthodox Church too. I’m pretty sure this guy is fine converting to Church that does not do that, not sure why you think he will leave it. As St. Ignatius of Loyola said, to think one’s spiritual path is same as yours is naive.I was once a Traditionlist Catholic but got push out the Novus Ordo Religionist a Nun to be Frank. So I left for good and got Baptized in a Russian Orthodox Church and have truly found my place in Mother Church…
While different EO churches are all over the board on this, the ROC itself, is, too. They range from re-baptism in defiance of the early councils affirming the validity of baptism by heretics (Arians, in particular), to accepting priests at times by “vesting”, and accepting their orders.That’s contrary to Nicene Creed, and therefore contrary to faith. Kinda sacrilegious from Russian Orthodox Church too.
Problem with that is clearly that he is bound by Eastern Canon Law, as well as Eastern Feasts etc.My understanding is that if a person belongs to a non-Catholic Christian church or ecclesial community that if they are received into the Catholic Church they become a member of that Catholic Church sui iuris that is closest in praxis to the church or ecclesial community they have left. Therefore, in your case that would mean you would become a member of the Russian Catholic Church.
It is possible to transfer between churches sui iuris so it may be possible to transfer to the Latin Catholic Church after you become a member of the Russian Catholic Church. You would need to take advice on this because I don’t really know the procedure or how easy it is.
Even if you become a member of the Russian Catholic Church all Catholic churches in communion with the Holy See are fully recognised and as a Catholic you can validly attend Mass/Divine Liturgy in any of them and receive Communion in any of them. Receiving some other sacraments may be a little more difficult, though, most noticeably, marriage.
That’s exactly what isn’t clear: is he bound by Eastern by membership in ROCOR, or by Western from his rite in ROCOR . . ,Problem with that is clearly that he is bound by Eastern Canon Law, as well as Eastern Feasts etc.