Well, just another question.
How come the Catholic church needs a whole catechism? What is wrong with just using the Bible?
Just a question to ponder. At what point did the Bible, as a complete entity, both Old and New Testament, finally become canonized and printed in a
single language that everyone could read? The answer is that the Councils of Carthage and Hippo, Catholic Church councils in the very late 300s, came up with the defined canon. Even then, until St. Jerome came up with a single unified translation in Latin (the vernacular of the time) later in the 400s, you had to be able to read Hebrew for the Old Testament AND Greek for the New Testament. Until that time, although there was agreement over certain books of the Bible, like the four Gospels and the Letters of Paul, there was considerable debate over other books that could have been included. The Didache, Epistle of Barnabas, and Shepherd of Hermas
almost made it in as inspired text, and Revelation was
almost thrown out. For a shorter time, there was also discussion over the Gospel of Thomas, which was eventually rejected for its Gnostic views. Until this time, there was no
universally agreed upon Bible. So… how did Christianity function? It had to function on Tradition. For almost 20% of Christianity’s history, there WAS no Bible! When it was ultimately compiled, who decided what was put in? The Catholic Church. A main difference between most Protestants and Catholics is that Protestants put their faith in the Bible alone. Catholics recognize that it is only one part of Tradition. For Protestants, if it’s not in the Bible, you don’t do it. For Catholics, you can do it, as long as it’s not specifically
forbidden by the Bible. (Well, ok, that’s a generalization, but I’m speaking broadly here.) There’s a significant difference.