R
Rolltide
Guest
Another point regarding this. The Catechism DOES use the Bible! If you search through it, you’ll see that it cites every relevant passage relating to the topic that it’s talking about. Protestants believe in the individual interpretation of the Bible. Catholics believe that the Holy Spirit protects the Church’s view. Further, the Church’s view is in large part the combined interpretation of thousands of the most brilliant Biblical scholars that have lived over the last 2,000 years. Protestantism has thousands of different interpretations of the Bible. Who is to know which is right? The Catholic Church believes in holding a consensus view. In fact, that quite literally is what the word “catholic” means! The English word “catholic”, in the general sense, simply means “universal”. So, the Catholic Church is the “universal” church, with a “universal” belief providing unity instead of disunity.Well, just another question.
How come the Catholic church needs a whole catechism? What is wrong with just using the Bible?
I also wanted to expand on my point from above. We had gotten to St. Jerome in the 400s AD. Finally, all of scripture was combined into a single Bible in a single language (Latin). But then, what happens? The Roman Empire collapses, sending Europe into the Dark Ages! Do you have any idea what the literacy rate was in Western Europe during the Dark Ages? Well, from about 500 AD to about 800-900 AD, it averaged just over 1%! If you weren’t in the clergy or a lord, you almost certainly couldn’t read. Further, books had to be copied by hand, and paper didn’t exist yet. Parchment was used instead, and that comes from animal hide. A single sheepskin could only produce a mere four pages of parchment. This meant that due to the labor involved and the expensive materials, you probably couldn’t afford a Bible anyway. One historian estimated that if you converted the expense into today’s dollars, that each Bible ranged from $20,000 to $50,000 in cost! This is also where the Protestant rumor comes from that “Catholics chained down their Bibles so that ordinary people couldn’t read them.” Not quite… they chained them so they wouldn’t be STOLEN! In fact, pretty much ALL books were chained down during that era. And in any case, ordinary people couldn’t read anyway!
So… this creates another problem. If almost no one could read, how could Christianity survive? Obviously they couldn’t read the Bible themselves. So… the clergy learned to read, and preached to them from the pulpit. (Once again… oral tradition!) Further, it was still often difficult to learn all of the various stories from the Bible. So, churches began adding paintings, statues, and stained glass windows to VISUALLY tell the stories. We weren’t worshiping those images, but we WERE using them to help teach illiterates about the Bible! So, for 20% of Christianity, we have no unified Bible, and for about HALF of Christianity, there were virtually no Christians (apart from clergy) that could read it ANYWAY! If we’re supposed to be using the Bible alone, without any help from an organized Church to interpret it, then Christianity was in REAL trouble, wasn’t it?