S
Salonika
Guest
And this also applies in the wider society - there seems often to be more understanding (and sometimes acceptance) of those who form relationships outside of marriage than those who do not marry or form such relationships.It is quite true I think that those of us who have made a commitment to the single state and celibate chastity as one’s call and vocation from God can have a lonely road ahead as things stand at this point in The Church.
And often/sometimes making assumptions about why you are single, I would guess. Seems to be a tendency to believe people are married because they fell in love, wanted children but with the singles, especially older ones, there are suggestions that we were too fussy, too focussed on other things. There are still shades of being married = postive, being single = something wrong with you.I know most people I know think of me simply as a single lay person in this state accidentally, not by choice - a “spinster” as it can be known.
Suspect this could also be influenced by the fact that being single is still sometimes seen as temporary. “Just wait until you met that nice man/woman and you’ll soon be married”.I do tend to think that probably there are not all that many who do embrace the single state and celibate chastity as their clear life call and vocation (although I could be wrong) and this may be why there is no recognition within The Church in any way. There is no ‘lobby’ for some form of recognition.
Think sometimes can be even harder for older guys who have never married - after all they are the ones who traditionally did the asking - we women could at least say we hadn’t been asked but what excuse did the guys have.!!!
But would there be more of a lobby for recognition if it was recognised state?
Also this topic (singleness as a vocation) is coming up more on this forum - in a number of contexts - so maybe a lobby is forming.