D
De_Maria
Guest
Ok.I think that’s essentially what the quote says. We cannot intentionallu persevere in sin and expect to retain faith.
That looks fine. But I don’t recommend the book of Concord to any Catholic. Or Protestant for that matter.Well, that’s fine for you to say, but how about being specific regarding the quote I provided. How is that a “protestant error”?
Because I want to forewarn any Catholics that the book of Concord contains Protestant errors mixed with some doctrines which agree with Catholic Teaching.If this is correct, why all the stuff above?
Here’s what mack said:
What I meant was that I don’t believe in OSAS, or perseverence of the saints.
Necessary in what way? As a response to grace, the New Obedience, borne of joyful willingness, like that of a child, or borne of an effort, out of fear, to add to Christ’s saving work?
*What then? Are we Jewsa any better off? No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, 10 as it is written:
“None is righteous, no, not one;*
Again, I think the quote for the Formula of Concord says exactly this: good works won’t save us, but they are required of us.
Perhaps, but if you pretend that the Formula of Concord has the whole doctrine of Justification correct, you are wrong. They preach justification by faith alone. As I read it, the Formula puts it in this order.
Faith, justification, good works.
Whereas, the Catholic doctrine for justification in adults is faith, works and then justification
Justification is not the result of faith and works. Righeousness or holiness, Sanctification is the result. God saves the holy. God saves the righteous. God saves those who do good works. God justifies those who do good works.
Romans 2:13
King James Version (KJV)
13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.