M
MarcoPolo
Guest
You bolded the word “interpretation,” presumably to dismiss the prophecy. However, the “interpretation” is itself in the book of Daniel. The interpretation of Daniel’s dream is in the OT text. The blog author expounded on that point in this other post.In the interpretation, Daniel prophesies that there will be four succeeding kingdoms (starting with the Babylonians)
On this verse, it seems you attempted to dismiss the prophecy of hands and feet piercing because other linguistic interpretations use different phrases. However, it appears that in the Septuagint and other pre-New Testament translations, the passage was understood as "pierced."The syntactical form of the Hebrew phrase appears to be lacking a verb, and this is supplied in the Aramaic targum which reads “they bite like a lion my hands and my feet”. The Septuagint has ωρυξαν χειράς μου και πόδας (“they have dug/pierced my hands and feet”), evidently taking the Hebrew to be based on the root כרה, supported by the Dead Sea Scrolls, Hahal Hever (5/6Hev1b f8_9:12) כרו ]ידי . ‘Dig’ has been understood in the sense of ‘pierced’ (as in Psalm 40:7/6), hence the rendering in the Syriac (“they have pierced my hands and feet”). From (wiki) in a quick searchbut New Jerusalem Bible (modern Catholic translation) - ’ a gang of vilains closing in around me, as if to hack off my hands and feet’
Needless to say, any affliction to “hands and feet” which is universally in the various interpretations, is fairly specific to the type of execution.
Your response neither addresses the public display of the execution, nor that the victims clothes would be gambled amongst them. All three taken together, that’s not a bad prophecy.
This response didn’t really address the author’s point that the Messiah had to come prior to 70 A.D. because otherwise the Second Temple wouldn’t be still standing, as indicated by the Haggai and Malachi prophecies.If the idea was to make it more lavish, of course it could be.