P
Peter_J
Guest
Just so. Like I was saying on the “Melkitization” thread, criticizing Latinization doesn’t make one anti-Latin.Well, of course Latin Christianity’s theology and developed traditions aren’t “bad.” The Latin Church certainly produces great saints and mystics. But I don’t think we should lose sight of the fact that they are out-of-place in an eastern Christian community…
I think you misread my earlier post. Saying that something is a school of thought doesn’t necessarily mean that it is right:Hmm… shouldn’t we acknowledge, though, that there are differences between different forms of Byzantine Christianity? i.e. in its Middle Eastern variety, Greek variety, Slavic variety, etc.?
there’s also another school that says that there can be differences between the thinking of different churches (sui iuris) but only if they are not the same rite. Hence according the second school there can be differences, for example, between the thinking of the Latin Church and the Melkite Church (because they’re not the same rite); but not between the Melkite Church and the UGCC (because they are the same rite).