M
Montie_Claunch
Guest
R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
The themes of Catholic social teaching (excerpted here), according to the USCCB, are:R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t heard anything much about the Church’s Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
Yep, I think this is an excellent program. I wish we could afford it at our parish.You might take a look at something like www.justfaith.org. Our Archdiocese approved the program and the response from parsishes has been very good.
The principal fondation for Social Justice in Catholicism lies in Holy Scripture.
FWIW, we subsidized two of our sister parish’s for all the books. They, in turn, really helped with putting together some meaningful immersion experiences.Yep, I think this is an excellent program. I wish we could afford it at our parish.
Ah yes, the ‘if it doesn’t address abortion it can’t be Catholic’ point of view. I suppose I should be thankful that this crowd hasn’t noticed that Jesus didn’t bother with the matter in his earthly ministry either…Not all agree.
Key themesR.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
Take a peek at the entire page. It mentions more than that including links to dissident groups.Ah yes, the ‘if it doesn’t address abortion it can’t be Catholic’ point of view. I suppose I should be thankful that this crowd hasn’t noticed that Jesus didn’t bother with the matter in his earthly ministry either…![]()
And more…Call To Action ‘96: ‘We Are People Of The Story’ Among them Hans Kung, Bishop Jacques Gaillot, Jack Jezreel from Kentucky, Sr. Miriam Therese Winter, Ada Isasi-Diaz, Tom Conry, Diann Neu, Fran Ferder, John Heagle, Bishop Ray Lucker…
No one said otherwise. But elevating anything above the direct teachings of Christ seems dangerous.Also, that Scripture does not specfically record the word abortion as coming out of Christ’s mouth in no way means it is of little importance.
So are you saying social justice is incompatible with democracy and/or a free market?It at least appears to me that those Catholcis who are most passionate for Social Justice often neglect a key component - subsidiarity, (CCC 1883-1885) vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a1.htm
Essentially, the lowest level of community that can deal with an issue should be enabled and allowed to do so.
Huh? The teaching on abortion is from Christ.No one said otherwise. But elevating anything above the direct teachings of Christ seems dangerous.
The link referred to specific heterodox Catholics and their organizations. I hardly think things like CTA have any legitimacy as related to Church teaching.As far as dissidents, etc., yes the reading lists will typically include works like “The Gospel through 3rd World Eyes” which discusses how very differently Christains in different parts of the world interpret very famliar readings in Scripture. Or, say, a work on Ghandi’s non-Christain, non-violent movement in India.
Alternate views? Heterodoxy is not simply an alternate view, it is an error.I guess the assumption is that the program is more suitable for Catholics who feel that their faith is a powerful beacon to carry into a dark world. Such people are seldom intimidated by alternate world views.
What type of Catholic supports CTA?However, if you are the sort of Catholic who views faith as a feeble candle that must be sheltered and protected, lest it fall pray to an outside concept, a challenging and thought provoking reading list is probably not for you.
Great, then why the need to support things like CTA?If I sound like I am rolling my eyes, I am. I’ve heard the same ‘it’s an attack on the Church because it might suggest that there is more to our faith than abortion!!!’ stuff about RENEW. But year after year, I see life long active parish members stand up and talk about their experiences with the program. Gasp, they generally recite Scripture and the Catechism with passion, and explain how prayer and study help reinject both into their lives…
You know, I often hear this argument. But I just don’t see it. I suppose it comes from the liklihood that those who are big on social justice often support government programs which assist in accomplishing this endoevaor. Yet, they are also typically the ones out there in the trenches helping the homeless, working with the poor, assisting immigrants, whatever it may be that needs to get addressed on the front lines. So their witness is for subsidiarity, indeed, but not simply subsidiarity without solidarity and support of society. Yes, it would seem that these are the ones who get it right as they see things and deal with them as they really are, understanding the true needs which exist instead of just abstractions of ideals.It at least appears to me that those Catholcis who are most passionate for Social Justice often neglect a key component - subsidiarity, (CCC 1883-1885) vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a1.htm
Essentially, the lowest level of community that can deal with an issue should be enabled and allowed to do so.
To avoid gridlock in the city.Great, then why the need to support things like CTA?
It transcends economic systems. It means that The State or the upper classes should not do for the poor what they themselves can do.So are you saying social justice is incompatible with democracy and/or a free market?
For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you. We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to make ourselves a model for you to follow. For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “If a man will not work, he shall not eat.”
The social teachings aren’t that complex: feed the poor, heal the sick, lift up the weary, etc. The thing that is important to remember is that nowhere are we told how to achieve these goals; the choice of the best means to use are left up to individuals to make. Although it is not uncommon for one side to accuse the other of rejecting Christ’s teaching and ignoring the poor (sick, in prison, …) that is almost never the case. The arguments are typically over what solutions will work best and are outside the expertise of the Church and, while individual bishops may support one or another approach, these prudential choices cannot be considered Church teachings.R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
I like that group back in the 70s.To avoid gridlock in the city.![]()
Not at all. OTOH, I don’t think democracy and free market necessarily go hand in hand. It seems to me that social justice and subsidiarity are perfectly compatible with free market economics. Democracy doesn’t necessarily go with Social Justice, Subsidiarity or free markets.So are you saying social justice is incompatible with democracy and/or a free market?
Exactly. And not just any government programs, but generally federal government programs. Looking over the lists in this thread describing social justice issues, I don’t see any that wouldn’t best be addressed by individuals, families and parishes.You know, I often hear this argument. But I just don’t see it. I suppose it comes from the liklihood that those who are big on social justice often support government programs which assist in accomplishing this endoevaor.
I would argue that the past encroachments on subsidiarity started us down a slippery slope: local control and involvement preempted by further removed authorities caused individuals and families to become less involved and so there were more calls for more removed authorities to get involved in more social issues, repeat. Calling for more removed entitites to back out would allow local support to move back in.Yet, they are also typically the ones out there in the trenches helping the homeless, working with the poor, assisting immigrants, whatever it may be that needs to get addressed on the front lines. So their witness is for subsidiarity, indeed, but not simply subsidiarity without solidarity and support of society.